I also reduced the visibility of a couple classes and renamed/consolidated some
test classes for consistency, eg. removing the `Simple` prefix or using the
`<Type>FieldMapperTests` convention for testing field mappers.
This commit rewords the expect header bug notice to provide the precise
details for the bug arising. In particular, the bug does not impact any
request over 1024 bytes, but instead impacts any request with a body
that is sent in two requests, the first with an Expect: 100-continue
header. The size is irrelevant, and requests with bodies larger than
1024 bytes are okay as long as the Expect: 100-continue header is not
also sent.
Relates #19911
Some unused annotation processors caused build-time failures. Instead,
we should just be explicit about which annotation processors we will use
(if any) with additional command-line flags.
Relates #19919
Due to a misordering of the HTTP handlers, the Netty 4 HTTP server
mishandles Expect: 100-continue headers from clients. This commit fixes
this issue by ordering the handlers correctly.
Relates #19904
testUnknownObjectException used to generate malformed json objects in some cases, due to the existence of arrays as it was not closing the injected object correctly. That is why the test was catching JsonParseException among the exception that are expected to be thrown. That is fixed by tracking where the new object is placed and placing its end object marker to the right level rather than always at the end.
Also introduced a mechanism to explicitly declare objects that won't cause any exception when they get additional objects injected, so that there is no need to override the method anymore as that caused copy pasting of the whole test method. This also makes sure that changes are reflected in tests, as those inner objects are not skipped but we actually check that what is declared is true (no exceptions get thrown when an additional object is added within them.
>However, the version of the new cluster should be the same or newer than the cluster that was
Afaik, you can't restore a snapshot to a newer cluster that is not consecutively newer (i.e. can't restore 1.x snapshot to a 5.x cluster). This is to clarify the statement above moving forward.
This change adds support for treating dots in field names found in
mappings as path separators, like was previously done for dynamic
mappings and document parsing.
closes#19443
Currently, when attempting to delete a snapshot, we check
if a snapshot is in progress before proceeding with the
delete. However, we do not check if a restore is taking
place before deleting. This can lead to concurrency issues
where a restore is in progress but the snapshotted files
for the restore are being deleted underneath.
This commit first checks if a restore is in progress and
if so, it prevents the deletion of a snapshot with an
exception.
Note that this is not a complete solution because it is
still possible that a restore of the same snapshot is
started after the deletion commenced but before the
deletion finished. But there is a much smaller window
for this to occur and this commit is a quick way to
check for the common case.
Ryan Ernst
Nik Everett
Ali Beyad
Luca Cavanna
Jun Ohtani
Christoph Büscher
David Pilato
javanna
Adrien Grand
Jason Tedor
Thomas Decaux
Tanguy Leroux
Clinton Gormley
Pius
Deb Adair
Areek Zillur
Lee Hinman