In 6.3 trial licenses were changed to default to security
disabled, and ee added some heuristics to detect when security should
be automatically be enabled if `xpack.security.enabled` was not set.
This change removes those heuristics, and requires that security be
explicitly enabled (via the `xpack.security.enabled` setting) for
trial licenses.
Relates: #38009
The existing implementation was slow due to exceptions being thrown if
an accessor did not have a time zone. This implementation queries for
having a timezone, local time and local date and also checks for an
instant preventing to throw an exception and thus speeding up the conversion.
This removes the existing method and create a new one named
DateFormatters.from(TemporalAccessor accessor) to resemble the naming of
the java time ones.
Before this change an epoch millis parser using the toZonedDateTime
method took approximately 50x longer.
Relates #37826
* move watcher to seq# occ
* top level set
* fix parsing and missing setters
* share toXContent for PutResponse and rest end point
* fix redacted password
* fix username reference
* fix deactivate-watch.asciidoc have seq no references
* add seq# + term to activate-watch.asciidoc
* more doc fixes
This commit fixes the test case that ensures only a priority
less then 0 is used with testNonPositivePriority. This also
allows the HLRC to support a value of 0.
Closes#37652
Previously, ShrinkAction would fail if
it was executed on an index that had
the same number of shards as the target
shrunken number.
This PR introduced a new BranchingStep that
is used inside of ShrinkAction to branch which
step to move to next, depending on the
shard values. So no shrink will occur if the
shard count is unchanged.
The apache commons http client implementations recently released
versions that solve TLS compatibility issues with the new TLS engine
that supports TLSv1.3 with JDK 11. This change updates our code to
use these versions since JDK 11 is a supported JDK and we should
allow the use of TLSv1.3.
Restricted indices (currently only .security-6 and .security) are special
internal indices that require setting the `allow_restricted_indices` flag
on every index permission that covers them. If this flag is `false`
(default) the permission will not cover these and actions against them
will not be authorized.
However, the monitoring APIs were the only exception to this rule.
This exception is herein forfeited and index monitoring privileges have to be
granted explicitly, using the `allow_restricted_indices` flag on the permission,
as is the case for any other index privilege.
This commit modifies the put follow index action to use a
CcrRepository when creating a follower index. It routes
the logic through the snapshot/restore process. A
wait_for_active_shards parameter can be used to configure
how long to wait before returning the response.
This change adds a _meta field storing the version in which
the index mappings were last updated to the 3 ML indices
that didn't previously have one:
- .ml-annotations
- .ml-meta
- .ml-notifications
All other ML indices already had such a _meta field.
This field will be useful if we ever need to automatically
update the index mappings during a future upgrade.
This commit changes the TransportVerifyShardBeforeCloseAction so that it issues a
forced flush, forcing the translog and the Lucene commit to contain the same max seq
number and global checkpoint in the case the Translog contains operations that were
not written in the IndexWriter (like a Delete that touches a non existing doc). This way
the assertion added in #37426 won't trip.
Related to #33888
We inject an Unfollow action before Shrink because the Shrink action
cannot be safely used on a following index, as it may not be fully
caught up with the leader index before the "original" following index is
deleted and replaced with a non-following Shrunken index. The Unfollow
action will verify that 1) the index is marked as "complete", and 2) all
operations up to this point have been replicated from the leader to the
follower before explicitly disconnecting the follower from the leader.
Injecting an Unfollow action before the Rollover action is done mainly
as a convenience: This allow users to use the same lifecycle policy on
both the leader and follower cluster without having to explictly modify
the policy to unfollow the index, while doing what we expect users to
want in most cases.
* ML: Add MlMetadata.upgrade_mode and API
* Adding tests
* Adding wait conditionals for the upgrade_mode call to return
* Adding tests
* adjusting format and tests
* Adjusting wait conditions for api return and msgs
* adjusting doc tests
* adding upgrade mode tests to black list
We have read and write aliases for the ML results indices. However,
the job still had methods that purported to reliably return the name
of the concrete results index being used by the job. After reindexing
prior to upgrade to 7.x this will be wrong, so the method has been
renamed and the comments made more explicit to say the returned index
name may not be the actual concrete index name for the lifetime of the
job. Additionally, the selection of indices when deleting the job
has been changed so that it works regardless of concrete index names.
All these changes are nice-to-have for 6.7 and 7.0, but will become
critical if we add rolling results indices in the 7.x release stream
as 6.7 and 7.0 nodes may have to operate in a mixed version cluster
that includes a version that can roll results indices.
This commit introduces the `create_snapshot` cluster privilege and
the `snapshot_user` role.
This role is to be used by "cronable" tools that call the snapshot API
periodically without recurring to the `manage` cluster privilege. The
`create_snapshot` cluster privilege is much more limited compared to
the `manage` privilege.
The `snapshot_user` role grants the privileges to view the metadata of
all indices (including restricted ones, i.e. .security). It obviously grants the
create snapshot privilege but the repository has to be created using another
role. In addition, it grants the privileges to (only) GET repositories and
snapshots, but not create and delete them.
The role does not allow to create repositories. This distinction is important
because snapshotting equates to the `read` index privilege if the user has
control of the snapshot destination, but this is not the case in this instance,
because the role does not grant control over repository configuration.
This commit introduces retention lease syncing from the primary to its
replicas when a new retention lease is added. A follow-up commit will
add a background sync of the retention leases as well so that renewed
retention leases are synced to replicas.
The unlucky timing can cause this test to fail when the indexing is triggered from `maybeTriggerAsyncJob`. As this is asynchronous, in can finish quicker then the test stepping over to next assertion
The introduced barrier solves the problem
closes#37695
* Remove empty statements
There are a couple of instances of undocumented empty statements all across the
code base. While they are mostly harmless, they make the code hard to read and
are potentially error-prone. Removing most of these instances and marking blocks
that look empty by intention as such.
* Change test, slightly more verbose but less confusing
When an index is frozen, two index settings are updated (index.frozen and
index.search.throttled) but the settings version is left unchanged and does
not reflect the settings update. This commit change the
TransportFreezeIndexAction so that it also increases the settings version
when an index is frozen/unfrozen.
This issue has been caught while working on the replication of closed
indices (#3388) in which index metadata for a closed index are updated
to frozen metadata and this specific assertion tripped.
The default value for ssl.supported_protocols no longer includes TLSv1
as this is an old protocol with known security issues.
Administrators can enable TLSv1.0 support by configuring the
appropriate `ssl.supported_protocols` setting, for example:
xpack.security.http.ssl.supported_protocols: ["TLSv1.2","TLSv1.1","TLSv1"]
Relates: #36021
Today, the mapping on the follower is managed and replicated from its
leader index by the ShardFollowTask. Thus, we should prevent users
from modifying the mapping on the follower indices.
Relates #30086
In some cases we only have a string collection instead of a string list
that we want to serialize out. We have a convenience method for writing
a list of strings, but no such method for writing a collection of
strings. Yet, a list of strings is a collection of strings, so we can
simply liberalize StreamOutput#writeStringList to be more generous in
the collections that it accepts and write out collections of strings
too. On the other side, we do not have a convenience method for reading
a list of strings. This commit addresses both of these issues.
* Use ILM for Watcher history deletion
This commit adds an index lifecycle policy for the `.watch-history-*` indices.
This policy is automatically used for all new watch history indices.
This does not yet remove the automatic cleanup that the monitoring plugin does
for the .watch-history indices, and it does not touch the
`xpack.watcher.history.cleaner_service.enabled` setting.
Relates to #32041
Some steps, such as steps that delete, close, or freeze an index, may fail due to a currently running snapshot of the index. In those cases, rather than move to the ERROR step, we should retry the step when the snapshot has completed.
This change adds an abstract step (`AsyncRetryDuringSnapshotActionStep`) that certain steps (like the ones I mentioned above) can extend that will automatically handle a situation where a snapshot is taking place. When a `SnapshotInProgressException` is received by the listener wrapper, a `ClusterStateObserver` listener is registered to wait until the snapshot has completed, re-running the ILM action when no snapshot is occurring.
This also adds integration tests for these scenarios (thanks to @talevy in #37552).
Resolves#37541
This commit moves the aggregation and mapping code from joda time to
java time. This includes field mappers, root object mappers, aggregations with date
histograms, query builders and a lot of changes within tests.
The cut-over to java time is a requirement so that we can support nanoseconds
properly in a future field mapper.
Relates #27330
This change moves the update to the results index mappings
from the open job action to the code that starts the
autodetect process.
When a rolling upgrade is performed we need to update the
mappings for already-open jobs that are reassigned from an
old version node to a new version node, but the open job
action is not called in this case.
Closes#37607
While tests migration from Zen1 to Zen2, we've encountered this test.
This test is organized as follows:
Starts the first cluster node.
Starts the second cluster node.
Checks that license is active.
Interesting fact that adding assertLicenseActive(true) between 1
and 2 also makes the test pass.
assertLicenseActive retrieves XPackLicenseState from the nodes
and checks that active flag is set. It's set to true even before
the cluster is initialized.
So this test does not make sense.
This grants the capability to grant privileges over certain restricted
indices (.security and .security-6 at the moment).
It also removes the special status of the superuser role.
IndicesPermission.Group is extended by adding the `allow_restricted_indices`
boolean flag. By default the flag is false. When it is toggled, you acknowledge
that the indices under the scope of the permission group can cover the
restricted indices as well. Otherwise, by default, restricted indices are ignored
when granting privileges, thus rendering them hidden for authorization purposes.
This effectively adds a confirmation "check-box" for roles that might grant
privileges to restricted indices.
The "special status" of the superuser role has been removed and coded as
any other role:
```
new RoleDescriptor("superuser",
new String[] { "all" },
new RoleDescriptor.IndicesPrivileges[] {
RoleDescriptor.IndicesPrivileges.builder()
.indices("*")
.privileges("all")
.allowRestrictedIndices(true)
// this ----^
.build() },
new RoleDescriptor.ApplicationResourcePrivileges[] {
RoleDescriptor.ApplicationResourcePrivileges.builder()
.application("*")
.privileges("*")
.resources("*")
.build()
},
null, new String[] { "*" },
MetadataUtils.DEFAULT_RESERVED_METADATA,
Collections.emptyMap());
```
In the context of the Backup .security work, this allows the creation of a
"curator role" that would permit listing (get settings) for all indices
(including the restricted ones). That way the curator role would be able to
ist and snapshot all indices, but not read or restore any of them.
Supersedes #36765
Relates #34454
* Remove obsolete deprecation checks
This also updates the old-indices check to be appropriate for the 7.x
series of releases, and leaves it as the only deprecation check in
place.
* Add toString to DeprecationIssue
* Bring filterChecks across from 6.x
* License headers
This change adds the unfollow action for CCR follower indices.
This is needed for the shrink action in case an index is a follower index.
This will give the follower index the opportunity to fully catch up with
the leader index, pause index following and unfollow the leader index.
After this the shrink action can safely perform the ilm shrink.
The unfollow action needs to be added to the hot phase and acts as
barrier for going to the next phase (warm or delete phases), so that
follower indices are being unfollowed properly before indices are expected
to go in read-only mode. This allows the force merge action to execute
its steps safely.
The unfollow action has three steps:
* `wait-for-indexing-complete` step: waits for the index in question
to get the `index.lifecycle.indexing_complete` setting be set to `true`
* `wait-for-follow-shard-tasks` step: waits for all the shard follow tasks
for the index being handled to report that the leader shard global checkpoint
is equal to the follower shard global checkpoint.
* `pause-follower-index` step: Pauses index following, necessary to unfollow
* `close-follower-index` step: Closes the index, necessary to unfollow
* `unfollow-follower-index` step: Actually unfollows the index using
the CCR Unfollow API
* `open-follower-index` step: Reopens the index now that it is a normal index
* `wait-for-yellow` step: Waits for primary shards to be allocated after
reopening the index to ensure the index is ready for the next step
In the case of the last two steps, if the index in being handled is
a regular index then the steps acts as a no-op.
Relates to #34648
Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gordon Brown <gordon.brown@elastic.co>
* Add ccr follow info api
This api returns all follower indices and per follower index
the provided parameters at put follow / resume follow time and
whether index following is paused or active.
Closes#37127
* iter
* [DOCS] Edits the get follower info API
* [DOCS] Fixes link to remote cluster
* [DOCS] Clarifies descriptions for configured parameters
Tim Vernum
Tim Brooks
Alexander Reelsen
Boaz Leskes
Jake Landis
Tal Levy
Jay Modi
David Roberts
Benjamin Trent
Martijn van Groningen
Albert Zaharovits
Przemyslaw Gomulka
Tanguy Leroux
Henrique Gonçalves
Gordon Brown
Jason Tedor
Christoph Büscher
Nhat Nguyen
Yulong
Lee Hinman
Andrey Ershov
Brandon Kobel
Albert Zaharovits
markharwood