The isAuthAllowed() method for license checking is used by code that
wants to ensure security is both enabled and available. The enabled
state is dynamic and provided by isSecurityEnabled(). But since security
is available with all license types, an check on the license level is
not necessary. Thus, this change replaces isAuthAllowed() with calling
isSecurityEnabled().
This change reintroduces the system index APIs for Kibana without the
changes made for marking what system indices could be accessed using
these APIs. In essence, this is a partial revert of #53912. The changes
for marking what system indices should be allowed access will be
handled in a separate change.
The APIs introduced here are wrapped versions of the existing REST
endpoints. A new setting is also introduced since the Kibana system
indices' names are allowed to be changed by a user in case multiple
instances of Kibana use the same instance of Elasticsearch.
Relates #52385
Backport of #54858
This commit introduces a new `geo` module that is intended
to be contain all the geo-spatial-specific features in server.
As a first step, the responsibility of registering the geo_shape
field mapper is moved to this module.
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Knize <nknize@gmail.com>
Refactor SearchHit to have separate document and meta fields.
This is a part of bigger refactoring of issue #24422 to remove
dependency on MapperService to check if a field is metafield.
Relates to PR: #38373
Relates to issue #24422
Co-authored-by: sandmannn <bohdanpukalskyi@gmail.com>
This is a simple naming change PR, to fix the fact that "metadata" is a
single English word, and for too long we have not followed general
naming conventions for it. We are also not consistent about it, for
example, METADATA instead of META_DATA if we were trying to be
consistent with MetaData (although METADATA is correct when considered
in the context of "metadata"). This was a simple find and replace across
the code base, only taking a few minutes to fix this naming issue
forever.
Backport of #53982
In order to prepare the `AliasOrIndex` abstraction for the introduction of data streams,
the abstraction needs to be made more flexible, because currently it really can be only
an alias or an index.
* Renamed `AliasOrIndex` to `IndexAbstraction`.
* Introduced a `IndexAbstraction.Type` enum to indicate what a `IndexAbstraction` instance is.
* Replaced the `isAlias()` method that returns a boolean with the `getType()` method that returns the new Type enum.
* Moved `getWriteIndex()` up from the `IndexAbstraction.Alias` to the `IndexAbstraction` interface.
* Moved `getAliasName()` up from the `IndexAbstraction.Alias` to the `IndexAbstraction` interface and renamed it to `getName()`.
* Removed unnecessary casting to `IndexAbstraction.Alias` by just checking the `getType()` method.
Relates to #53100
This commit causes negative TimeValues, other than -1 which is sometimes used as
a sentinel value, to be rejected during parsing.
Also introduces a hack to allow ILM to load policies which were written to the
cluster state with a negative min_age, treating those values as 0, which should
match the behavior of prior versions.
This commit introduces a module for Kibana that exposes REST APIs that
will be used by Kibana for access to its system indices. These APIs are wrapped
versions of the existing REST endpoints. A new setting is also introduced since
the Kibana system indices' names are allowed to be changed by a user in case
multiple instances of Kibana use the same instance of Elasticsearch.
Additionally, the ThreadContext has been extended to indicate that the use of
system indices may be allowed in a request. This will be built upon in the future
for the protection of system indices.
Backport of #52385
* Smarter copying of the rest specs and tests (#52114)
This PR addresses the unnecessary copying of the rest specs and allows
for better semantics for which specs and tests are copied. By default
the rest specs will get copied if the project applies
`elasticsearch.standalone-rest-test` or `esplugin` and the project
has rest tests or you configure the custom extension `restResources`.
This PR also removes the need for dozens of places where the x-pack
specs were copied by supporting copying of the x-pack rest specs too.
The plugin/task introduced here can also copy the rest tests to the
local project through a similar configuration.
The new plugin/task allows a user to minimize the surface area of
which rest specs are copied. Per project can be configured to include
only a subset of the specs (or tests). Configuring a project to only
copy the specs when actually needed should help with build cache hit
rates since we can better define what is actually in use.
However, project level optimizations for build cache hit rates are
not included with this PR.
Also, with this PR you can no longer use the includePackaged flag on
integTest task.
The following items are included in this PR:
* new plugin: `elasticsearch.rest-resources`
* new tasks: CopyRestApiTask and CopyRestTestsTask - performs the copy
* new extension 'restResources'
```
restResources {
restApi {
includeCore 'foo' , 'bar' //will include the core specs that start with foo and bar
includeXpack 'baz' //will include x-pack specs that start with baz
}
restTests {
includeCore 'foo', 'bar' //will include the core tests that start with foo and bar
includeXpack 'baz' //will include the x-pack tests that start with baz
}
}
```
This commit modifies the codebase so that our production code uses a
single instance of the IndexNameExpressionResolver class. This change
is being made in preparation for allowing name expression resolution
to be augmented by a plugin.
In order to remove some instances of IndexNameExpressionResolver, the
single instance is added as a parameter of Plugin#createComponents and
PersistentTaskPlugin#getPersistentTasksExecutor.
Backport of #52596
Backport from #52179
Don't rely on the delete index api to resolve all the enrich indices for a particular enrich policy using a '[policy_name]-*' wildcard expression. With this change, the delete policy api will resolve the indices to remove and pass that directly to the delete index api.
This resolves a bug, that if `action.destructive_requires_name` setting has been set to true then the delete policy api is unable to remove the enrich indices related to the policy being deleted.
Closes#51228
Co-authored-by: bellengao <gbl_long@163.com>
This commit changes how RestHandlers are registered with the
RestController so that a RestHandler no longer needs to register itself
with the RestController. Instead the RestHandler interface has new
methods which when called provide information about the routes
(method and path combinations) that are handled by the handler
including any deprecated and/or replaced combinations.
This change also makes the publication of RestHandlers safe since they
no longer publish a reference to themselves within their constructors.
Closes#51622
Co-authored-by: Jason Tedor <jason@tedor.me>
Backport of #51950
Backport of #51526.
Previous the formatter was breaking simple if/else statements (i.e.
without braces) onto separate lines, which could be fragile because the
formatter cannot also introduce braces. Instead, keep such expressions
on the same line.
This commit deprecates the creation of dot-prefixed index names (e.g.
.watches) unless they are either 1) a hidden index, or 2) registered by
a plugin that extends SystemIndexPlugin. This is the first step
towards more thorough protections for system indices.
This commit also modifies several plugins which use dot-prefixed indices
to register indices they own as system indices, and adds a plugin to
register .tasks as a system index.
Backport / reimplementation of #50786 on 7.x.
Opt-in `buildSrc` for automatic formatting. This required a config tweak
in order to pick up all the Java sources, and as a result more files are
now found in the Enrich plugin, that were previously missed.
I also moved the 2 Java files in `buildSrc/src/main/groovy` into the Java
directory, which required some follow-up changes.
Backport of #50909. The current formatting config allows some long
generic declarations to break the 140 character limit. Tweak the config
to wrap such lines.
Backport #50244 to 7.x branch.
If a processor executes asynchronously and the ingest simulate api simulates with
multiple documents then the order of the documents in the response may not match
the order of the documents in the request.
Alexander Reelsen discovered this issue with the enrich processor with the following reproduction:
```
PUT cities/_doc/munich
{"zip":"80331","city":"Munich"}
PUT cities/_doc/berlin
{"zip":"10965","city":"Berlin"}
PUT /_enrich/policy/zip-policy
{
"match": {
"indices": "cities",
"match_field": "zip",
"enrich_fields": [ "city" ]
}
}
POST /_enrich/policy/zip-policy/_execute
GET _cat/indices/.enrich-*
POST /_ingest/pipeline/_simulate
{
"pipeline": {
"processors" : [
{
"enrich" : {
"policy_name": "zip-policy",
"field" : "zip",
"target_field": "city",
"max_matches": "1"
}
}
]
},
"docs": [
{ "_id": "first", "_source" : { "zip" : "80331" } } ,
{ "_id": "second", "_source" : { "zip" : "50667" } }
]
}
```
* fixed test compile error
The cluster state is obtained twice in the EnrichPolicyRunner when updating
the final alias. There is a possibility for the state to be slightly different
between those two calls. This PR just has the function get the cluster state
once and reuse it for the life of the function call.
Backport of #48849. Update `.editorconfig` to make the Java settings the
default for all files, and then apply a 2-space indent to all `*.gradle`
files. Then reformat all the files.
Backport of #48908
The enrich project doesn't have much history as all the other gradle projects,
so it makes sense to enable spotless for this gradle project.
The enrich stats api picked the wrong task to be displayed
in the executing stats section.
In case `wait_for_completion` was set to `false` then no task
was being displayed and if that param was set to `true` then
the wrong task was being displayed (transport action task instead
of enrich policy executor task).
Testing executing policies in enrich stats api is tricky.
I have verified locally that this commit fixes the bug.
This PR adds an origin for the Enrich feature, and modifies the background
maintenance task to use the origin when executing client operations.
Without this fix, the maintenance task fails to execute when security is
enabled.
This PR adds the ability to run the enrich policy execution task in the background,
returning a task id instead of waiting for the completed operation.
Prior to this change the `target_field` would always be a json array
field in the document being ingested. This to take into account that
multiple enrich documents could be inserted into the `target_field`.
However the default `max_matches` is `1`. Meaning that by default
only a single enrich document would be added to `target_field` json
array field.
This commit changes this; if `max_matches` is set to `1` then the single
document would be added as a json object to the `target_field` and
if it is configured to a higher value then the enrich documents will be
added as a json array (even if a single enrich document happens to be
enriched).
Changes the execution logic to create a new task using the execute request,
and attaches the new task to the policy runner to be updated. Also, a new
response is now returned from the execute api, which contains either the task
id of the execution, or the completed status of the run. The fields are mutually
exclusive to make it easier to discern what type of response it is.
Currently if the document being ingested contains another field value
than a string then the processor fails with an error.
This commit changes the match processor to handle number values
and array values correctly.
If a json array is detected then the `terms` query is used instead
of the `term` query.
The currently logic shard selecting logic selects a random shard copy
instead of selecting the local shard copy and if local copy is not
available then selecting a random shard copy. The latter is desired
behaviour for enrich.
By reusing `OperationRouting#searchShards(...)` we get the desired
behaviour and reuse the same logic that the search api is using.
Adds a check when running an Enrich policy to make sure that an Enrich index
is force merged down to one segment, and if it was not fully merged, attempts
the merge again, up to a configurable number of times.
this commit introduces a geo-match enrich processor that looks up a specific
`geo_point` field in the enrich-index for all entries that have a geo_shape match field
that meets some specific relation criteria with the input field.
For example, the enrich index may contain documents with zipcodes and their respective
geo_shape. Ingesting documents with a geo_point field can be enriched with which zipcode
they associate according to which shape they are contained within.
this commit also refactors some of the MatchProcessor by moving a lot of the shared code to
AbstractEnrichProcessor.
Closes#42639.
Adds a pipeline that removes ids and routing from documents before indexing
them into enrich indices. Enrich documents may come from multiple indices,
and thus have id collisions on them. This pipeline ensures that documents
with colliding id fields do not clobber one another during the reindex operation
while executing an enrich policy.
Currently the policy config is placed directly in the json object
of the toplevel `policies` array field. For example:
```
{
"policies": [
{
"match": {
"name" : "my-policy",
"indices" : ["users"],
"match_field" : "email",
"enrich_fields" : [
"first_name",
"last_name",
"city",
"zip",
"state"
]
}
}
]
}
```
This change adds a `config` field in each policy json object:
```
{
"policies": [
{
"config": {
"match": {
"name" : "my-policy",
"indices" : ["users"],
"match_field" : "email",
"enrich_fields" : [
"first_name",
"last_name",
"city",
"zip",
"state"
]
}
}
}
]
}
```
This allows us in the future to add other information about policies
in the get policy api response.
The UI will consume this API to build an overview of all policies.
The UI may in the future include additional information about a policy
and the plan is to include that in the get policy api, so that this
information can be gathered in a single api call.
An example of the information that is likely to be added is:
* Last policy execution time
* The status of a policy (executing, executed, unexecuted)
* Information about the last failure if exists