When a new cluster starts, the HTTP layer becomes ready to accept incoming
requests while the basic license is still being populated in the background.
When a get license request comes in before the license is ready, it can get
404 error. This PR fixes it by either wrap the license check in assertBusy or
ensure the license is ready before perform the check.
This is a backport for both #60498 and #60573
This commit adds support for rules with multiple tokens on LHS, also
known as "contraction rules", into stemmer override token
filter. Contraction rules are handy into translating multiple
inflected words into the same root form. One side effect of this change is
that it brings stemmer override rules format closer to synonym rules
format so that it makes it easier to translate one into another.
This change also makes stemmer override rules parser more strict so
that it should catch more errors which were previously accepted.
Closes#56113
DocsClientYamlTestSuiteIT sometimes fails for CCR
related tests because tests are started before the license
is fully applied and active within the cluster. The first
tests to be executed then fails with the error noticed
in #53430. This can be easily reproduced locally by
only running CCR docs tests.
This commit adds some @Before logic in
DocsClientYamlTestSuiteIT so that it waits for the
license to be active before running CCR tests.
Closes#53430
We only drop ilm/slm policies on teardown only if the running docs tests
are ilm/slm related.
This updates the test name pattern to match the ilm/slm related tests
when running on windows
(eg.`reference\ilm/update-lifecycle-policy/line_29`).
(cherry picked from commit 4bb5bbd52eee59bd3eee6d766a9efc159822d9b9)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan <andrei.dan@elastic.co>
The docs tests have recently been running much slower than before (see #49753).
The gist here is that with ILM/SLM we do a lot of unnecessary setup / teardown work on each
test. Compounded with the slightly slower cluster state storage mechanism, this causes the
tests to run much slower.
In particular, on RAMDisk, docs:check is taking
ES 7.4: 6:55 minutes
ES master: 16:09 minutes
ES with this commit: 6:52 minutes
on SSD, docs:check is taking
ES 7.4: ??? minutes
ES master: 32:20 minutes
ES with this commit: 11:21 minutes
The docs test suite is still timing out on CI at 35 minutes, so
pushing it to 40 minutes while we determine the cause of the slowdown.
Relates: #49753
Backport of: #51200
We have about 800 `ObjectParsers` in Elasticsearch, about 700 of which
are final. This is *probably* the right way to declare them because in
practice we never mutate them after they are built. And we certainly
don't change the static reference. Anyway, this adds `final` to these
parsers.
I found the non-final parsers with this:
```
diff \
<(find . -type f -name '*.java' -exec grep -iHe 'static.*PARSER\s*=' {} \+ | sort) \
<(find . -type f -name '*.java' -exec grep -iHe 'static.*final.*PARSER\s*=' {} \+ | sort) \
2>&1 | grep '^<'
```
I have been hitting the suite timeout on `DocsClientYamlTestSuiteIT`
As far as I can see, the docs tests are taking quite a while, I assume
it's because more and more docs snippets get added over time, which
means more tests. The current suite timeout is the default 20 minutes.
It takes me just a little less than 20 minutes to run these on my
laptop. On my CI, I end up hitting the suite timeout. Hereby I propose
that we increase the suite timeout to 30 minutes.
Our rest testing framework has support for sniffing the host metadata on
startup and, before this change, it'd sniff that metadata before running
the first test. This prevents running these tests against
elasticsearch installations that won't support sniffing like Elastic
Cloud. This change allows tests to only sniff for metadata when they
encounter a test with a `node_selector`. These selectors are the things
that need the metadata anyway and they are super rare. Tests that use
these won't be able to run against installations that don't support
sniffing but we can just skip them. In the case of Elastic Cloud, these
tests were never going to work against Elastic Cloud anyway.
We have made node selectors configurable per request, but all
of other language clients don't allow for that.
A good reason not to do so, is that having a different node selector
per request breaks round-robin. This commit makes NodeSelector
configurable only at client initialization. It also improves the docs
on this matter, important given that a single node selector can still
affect round-robin.
This commit exposes the master version to the REST test context. This
will be needed in a follow-up where the master version will be used to
determine whether or not a certain warning header is expected.
We have a pile of documentation describing how to rebuild the built in
language analyzers and, previously, our documentation testing framework
made sure that the examples successfully built *an* analyzer but they
didn't assert that the analyzer built by the documentation matches the
built in anlayzer. Unsuprisingly, some of the examples aren't quite
right.
This adds a mechanism that tests that the analyzers built by the docs.
The mechanism is fairly simple and brutal but it seems to be working:
build a hundred random unicode sequences and send them through the
`_analyze` API with the rebuilt analyzer and then again through the
built in analyzer. Then make sure both APIs return the same results.
Each of these calls to `_anlayze` takes about 20ms on my laptop which
seems fine.
This change adds a new plugin called `analysis-nori` that exposes
Korean text analysis in es using the new Lucene Korean analyzer module named (`nori`).
The plugin adds:
* a Korean analyzer: `nori`
* a Korean tokenizer: `nori_tokenizer`
* a part of speech stop filter: `nori_part_of_speech`
* a filter that can replace Hanja characters with their Hangul transcription: `nori_readingform`
At current, we do not feel there is enough of a reason to shade the low
level rest client. It caused problems with commons logging and IDE's
during the brief time it was used. We did not know exactly how many
users will need this, and decided that leaving shading out until we
gather more information is best. Users can still shade the jar
themselves. For information and feeback, see issue #26366.
Closes#26328
This reverts commit 3a20922046.
This reverts commit 2c271f0f22.
This reverts commit 9d10dbea39.
This reverts commit e816ef89a2.
Raw requests are supported only by the java yaml test runner and were introduced to test docs snippets. Some yaml tests ended up using them (see #23497) which causes failures for other language clients. This commit migrates those yaml tests to Java tests that send requests through the Java low-level REST client, and also moves the ability to send raw requests to a special client that's only available when testing docs snippets.
Closes#25694
This change simplifies how the rest test runner finds test files and
removes all leniency. Previously multiple prefixes and suffixes would
be tried, and tests could exist inside or outside of the classpath,
although outside of the classpath never quite worked. Now only classpath
tests are supported, and only one resource prefix is supported,
`/rest-api-spec/tests`.
closes#20240
Converts the analysis docs to that were marked as json into `CONSOLE`
format. A few of them were in yaml but marked as json for historical
reasons. I added more complete examples for a few of the less obvious
sounding ones.
Relates to #18160
* Remove a checked exception, replacing it with `ParsingException`.
* Remove all Parser classes for the yaml sections, replacing them with static methods.
* Remove `ClientYamlTestFragmentParser`. Isn't used any more.
* Remove `ClientYamlTestSuiteParseContext`, replacing it with some static utility methods.
I did not rewrite the parsers using `ObjectParser` because I don't think it is worth it right now.
At one point in the past when moving out the rest tests from core to
their own subproject, we had multiple test classes which evenly split up
the tests to run. However, we simplified this and went back to a single
test runner to have better reproduceability in tests. This change
removes the remnants of that multiplexing support.
This makes it obvious that these tests are for running the client yaml
suites. Now that there are other ways of running tests using the REST
client against a running cluster we can't go on calling the shared
client yaml tests "REST tests". They are rest tests, but they aren't
**the** rest tests.
This adds a header that looks like `Location: /test/test/1` to the
response for the index/create/update API. The requirement for the header
comes from https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.htmlhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.2 claims that relative
URIs are OK. So we use an absolute path which should resolve to the
appropriate location.
Closes#19079
This makes large changes to our rest test infrastructure, allowing us
to write junit tests that test a running cluster via the rest client.
It does this by splitting ESRestTestCase into two classes:
* ESRestTestCase is the superclass of all tests that use the rest client
to interact with a running cluster.
* ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase is the superclass of all tests that use the
rest client to run the yaml tests. These tests are shared across all
official clients, thus the `ClientYamlSuite` part of the name.
We weren't doing it before because we weren't starting the plugins.
Now we are.
The hardest part of this was handling the files the tests expect
to be on the filesystem. extraConfigFiles was broken.
Adds infrastructure so `gradle :docs:check` will extract tests from
snippets in the documentation and execute the tests. This is included
in `gradle check` so it should happen on CI and during a normal build.
By default each `// AUTOSENSE` snippet creates a unique REST test. These
tests are executed in a random order and the cluster is wiped between
each one. If multiple snippets chain together into a test you can annotate
all snippets after the first with `// TEST[continued]` to have the
generated tests for both snippets joined.
Snippets marked as `// TESTRESPONSE` are checked against the response
of the last action.
See docs/README.asciidoc for lots more.
Closes#12583. That issue is about catching bugs in the docs during build.
This catches *some* bugs in the docs during build which is a good start.