This PR adds the initial Java side changes to enable
use of the per-partition categorization functionality
added in elastic/ml-cpp#1293.
There will be a followup change to complete the work,
as there cannot be any end-to-end integration tests
until elastic/ml-cpp#1293 is merged, and also
elastic/ml-cpp#1293 does not implement some of the
more peripheral functionality, like stop_on_warn and
per-partition stats documents.
The changes so far cover REST APIs, results object
formats, HLRC and docs.
Backport of #57683
This PR implements the following changes to make ML model snapshot
retention more flexible in advance of adding a UI for the feature in
an upcoming release.
- The default for `model_snapshot_retention_days` for new jobs is now
10 instead of 1
- There is a new job setting, `daily_model_snapshot_retention_after_days`,
that defaults to 1 for new jobs and `model_snapshot_retention_days`
for pre-7.8 jobs
- For days that are older than `model_snapshot_retention_days`, all
model snapshots are deleted as before
- For days that are in between `daily_model_snapshot_retention_after_days`
and `model_snapshot_retention_days` all but the first model snapshot
for that day are deleted
- The `retain` setting of model snapshots is still respected to allow
selected model snapshots to be retained indefinitely
Backport of #56125
This change adds:
- A new option, allow_lazy_open, to anomaly detection jobs
- A new option, allow_lazy_start, to data frame analytics jobs
Both work in the same way: they allow a job to be
opened/started even if no ML node exists that can
accommodate the job immediately. In this situation
the job waits in the opening/starting state until ML
node capacity is available. (The starting state for data
frame analytics jobs is new in this change.)
Additionally, the ML nightly maintenance tasks now
creates audit warnings for ML jobs that are unassigned.
This means that jobs that cannot be assigned to an ML
node for a very long time will show a yellow warning
triangle in the UI.
A final change is that it is now possible to close a job
that is not assigned to a node without using force.
This is because previously jobs that were open but
not assigned to a node were an aberration, whereas
after this change they'll be relatively common.
Lisa Cawley
David Roberts
Przemysław Witek
Dimitris Athanasiou
István Zoltán Szabó
James Rodewig