An auto follow pattern:
* cannot start with `_`
* cannot contain a `,`
* can be encoded in UTF-8
* the length of UTF-8 encoded bytes is no longer than 255 bytes
In order to start shard follow tasks, the resume follow api already
needs execute N requests to the elected master node.
The pause follow API is also a master node action, which would make
how both APIs execute more consistent.
Error was thrown if leader index had no soft deletes enabled, but it then continued creating the follower index.
The test caught this bug, but very rarely due to timing issue.
Build failure instance:
```
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,597][INFO ][o.e.x.c.LocalIndexFollowingIT] [testDoNotCreateFollowerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes] before test
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,599][INFO ][o.e.c.s.ClusterSettings ] [node_s_0] updating [cluster.remote.local.seeds] from [[]] to [["127.0.0.1:9300"]]
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,599][INFO ][o.e.c.s.ClusterSettings ] [node_s_0] updating [cluster.remote.local.seeds] from [[]] to [["127.0.0.1:9300"]]
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,609][INFO ][o.e.c.m.MetaDataCreateIndexService] [node_s_0] [leader-index] creating index, cause [api], templates [random-soft-deletes-templat
e, one_shard_index_template], shards [2]/[0], mappings []
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,628][INFO ][o.e.c.r.a.AllocationService] [node_s_0] Cluster health status changed from [YELLOW] to [GREEN] (reason: [shards started [[leader-
index][0]] ...]).
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,660][INFO ][o.e.x.c.a.TransportPutFollowAction] [node_s_0] [follower-index] creating index, cause [ccr_create_and_follow], shards [2]/[0]
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,675][INFO ][o.e.c.s.ClusterSettings ] [node_s_0] updating [cluster.remote.local.seeds] from [["127.0.0.1:9300"]] to [[]]
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,676][INFO ][o.e.c.s.ClusterSettings ] [node_s_0] updating [cluster.remote.local.seeds] from [["127.0.0.1:9300"]] to [[]]
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,678][INFO ][o.e.x.c.LocalIndexFollowingIT] [testDoNotCreateFollowerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes] after test
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,678][INFO ][o.e.x.c.LocalIndexFollowingIT] [testDoNotCreateFollowerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes] [LocalIndexFollowingIT#testDoNotCreateFoll
owerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes]: cleaning up after test
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,678][INFO ][o.e.c.m.MetaDataDeleteIndexService] [node_s_0] [follower-index/TlWlXp0JSVasju2Kr_hksQ] deleting index
1> [2018-11-05T20:29:38,678][INFO ][o.e.c.m.MetaDataDeleteIndexService] [node_s_0] [leader-index/FQ6EwIWcRAKD8qvOg2eS8g] deleting index
FAILURE 0.23s J0 | LocalIndexFollowingIT.testDoNotCreateFollowerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes <<< FAILURES!
> Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError:
> Expected: <false>
> but: was <true>
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([7A3C89DA3BCA17DD:65C26CBF6FEF0B39]:0)
> at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
> at org.elasticsearch.xpack.ccr.LocalIndexFollowingIT.testDoNotCreateFollowerIfLeaderDoesNotHaveSoftDeletes(LocalIndexFollowingIT.java:83)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```
Build failure: https://elasticsearch-ci.elastic.co/job/elastic+elasticsearch+6.5+intake/46/console
The suite FollowerFailOverIT is failing because some documents are not
replicated to the follower. Maybe the FollowTask is not working as
expected or the background indexers eat all resources while the follower
cluster is trying to reform after a failover; then CI is not fast enough
to replicate all the indexed docs within 60 seconds (sometimes I see 80k
docs on the leader).
This commit limits the number of documents to be indexed into the leader
index by the background threads so that we can eliminate the latter
case. This change also replaces a docCount assertion with a docIds
assertion so we can have more information if these tests fail again.
Relates #33337
Only the response classes of get auto follow pattern, the follow and stats APIs
were moved away from Streamable. The other APIs use `AcknowledgedResponse`
or `BaseTasksResponse` as response class and
moving that class away from Streamable is a bigger change.
Stop passing `Settings` to `AbstractComponent`'s ctor. This allows us to
stop passing around `Settings` in a *ton* of places. While this change
touches many files, it touches them all in fairly small, mechanical
ways, doing a few things per file:
1. Drop the `super(settings);` line on everything that extends
`AbstractComponent`.
2. Drop the `settings` argument to the ctor if it is no longer used.
3. If the file doesn't use `logger` then drop `extends
AbstractComponent` from it.
4. Clean up all compilation failure caused by the `settings` removal
and drop any now unused `settings` isntances and method arguments.
I've intentionally *not* removed the `settings` argument from a few
files:
1. TransportAction
2. AbstractLifecycleComponent
3. BaseRestHandler
These files don't *need* `settings` either, but this change is large
enough as is.
Relates to #34488
Only the follow stats request couldn't be changed to use Writeable serialization,
because that requires changes in `TransportTasksAction` and `BaseTasksRequest` base classes.
This commit fixes two issues with the CCR API specification:
- remove the CCR stats endpoint, it is not currently implemented
- fix the documentation links
* Changed the auto follow stats to also include follow stats.
* Renamed the auto follow stats api to stats api and changed its url path
from `/_ccr/auto_follow/stats` `/_ccr/stats`.
* Removed `/_ccr/stats` url path for the follow stats api, which makes
the index parameter a required parameter.
* Fixed docs.
Index shard stats for the follower shard are fetched, when a shard follow task is started.
This is needed in order to bootstap the shard follow task with the follower global checkpoint.
Sometimes index shard stats are not available (e.g. during a restart) and
we fail now, while it is very likely that these stats will be available some time later.
This limit is based on the size in bytes of the operations in the write buffer. If this limit is exceeded then no more read operations will be coordinated until the size in bytes of the write buffer has dropped below the configured write buffer size limit.
Renamed existing `max_write_buffer_size` to ``max_write_buffer_count` to indicate that limit is count based.
Closes#34705
We should not create a follower index and abort a follow request if the
leader does not have soft-deletes. Moreover, we also should not
auto-follow an index if it does not have soft-deletes.
With this change, we apply the common test config automatically to all
newly created tasks instead of opting in specifically.
For plugin authors using the plugin externally this means that the
configuration will be applied to their RandomizedTestingTasks as well.
The purpose of the task is to simplify setup and make it easier to
change projects that use the `test` task but actually run integration
tests to use a task called `integTest` for clarity, but also because
we may want to configure and run them differently.
E.x. using different levels of concurrency.
Per #31717 this commit changes the defaults to the following:
Batch size of 5120 ops.
Maximum of 12 concurrent read requests.
Maximum of 9 concurrent write requests.
This is not necessarily our final values but it's good to have these as defaults for the purposes of initial testing.
* Change the `TransportPauseFollowAction` to extend from `TransportMasterNodeAction`
instead of `HandledAction`, this removes a sync cluster state api call.
* Introduced `ResponseHandler` that removes duplicated code in `TransportPauseFollowAction` and
`TransportResumeFollowAction`.
* Changed `PauseFollowAction.Request` to not use `readFrom()`.
Both testFollowIndexAndCloseNode and testFailOverOnFollower failed
because they responded to the FollowTask a TransportService closed
exception which is currently considered as a fatal error. This behavior
is not desirable since a closing node can throw that exception, and we
should retry in that case.
This change adds TransportService closed error to the list of retryable
errors.
Closes#34694
As part of this change the leader index name and leader cluster name are
stored in the CCR metadata in the follow index. The resume follow api
will read that when a resume follow request is executed.
Since #34412 and #34474, a follower must have soft-deletes enabled
to work correctly. This change requires soft-deletes on the follower.
Relates #34412
Relates #34474
* Changed the resource id of auto follow patterns to be a user defined name
instead of being the leader cluster alias name.
* Fail when an unfollowed leader index matches with two or more auto follow patterns.
We should be consistent here. We were already using the casing "Ccr" and
this is the preferred casing for Java class names. This commit adjusts
the names of some classes that were using the casing "CCR" to be "Ccr".
In some of our X-Pack REST tests we have to wait for pending tasks to
complete. We are now needing this functionality in ESRestTestCase for
the docs tests where we run against X-Pack features. This commit moves
the helper method that we have in X-Pack to ESRestTestCase, and removes
duplicate logic from waiting for rollup tasks to complete.
Since #34288, we might hit deadlock if the FollowTask has more fetchers
than writers. This can happen in the following scenario:
Suppose the leader has two operations [seq#0, seq#1]; the FollowTask has
two fetchers and one writer.
1. The FollowTask issues two concurrent fetch requests: {from_seq_no: 0,
num_ops:1} and {from_seq_no: 1, num_ops:1} to read seq#0 and seq#1
respectively.
2. The second request which fetches seq#1 completes before, and then it
triggers a write request containing only seq#1.
3. The primary of a follower fails after it has replicated seq#1 to
replicas.
4. Since the old primary did not respond, the FollowTask issues another
write request containing seq#1 (resend the previous write request).
5. The new primary has seq#1 already; thus it won't replicate seq#1 to
replicas but will wait for the global checkpoint to advance at least
seq#1.
The problem is that the FollowTask has only one writer and that writer
is waiting for seq#0 which won't be delivered until the writer completed.
This PR proposes to replicate existing operations with the old primary
term (instead of the current term) on the follower. In particular, when
the following primary detects that it has processed an process already,
it will look up the term of an existing operation with the same seq_no
in the Lucene index, then rewrite that operation with the old term
before replicating it to the following replicas. This approach is
wait-free but requires soft-deletes on the follower.
Relates #34288
Today we rely on the LocalCheckpointTracker to ensure no duplicate when
enabling optimization using max_seq_no_of_updates. The problem is that
the LocalCheckpointTracker is not fully reloaded when opening an engine
with an out-of-order index commit. Suppose the starting commit has seq#0
and seq#2, then the current LocalCheckpointTracker would return "false"
when asking if seq#2 was processed before although seq#2 in the commit.
This change scans the existing sequence numbers in the starting commit,
then marks these as completed in the LocalCheckpointTracker to ensure
the consistent state between LocalCheckpointTracker and Lucene commit.
This change makes it no longer possible to follow / auto follow without
specifying a leader cluster. If a local index needs to be followed
then `cluster.remote.*.seeds` should point to nodes in the local cluster.
Closes#34258
Martijn van Groningen
Nik Everett
Alexander Reelsen
Nhat Nguyen
David Kyle
Jason Tedor
Andrey Atapin
Alpar Torok
Boaz Leskes