Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ali Beyad 4641254ea6 Parameter improvements to Cluster Health API wait for shards (#20223)
* Params improvements to Cluster Health API wait for shards

Previously, the cluster health API used a strictly numeric value
for `wait_for_active_shards`. However, with the introduction of
ActiveShardCount and the removal of write consistency level for
replication operations, `wait_for_active_shards` is used for
write operations to represent values for ActiveShardCount. This
commit moves the cluster health API's usage of `wait_for_active_shards`
to be consistent with its usage in the write operation APIs.

This commit also changes `wait_for_relocating_shards` from a
numeric value to a simple boolean value `wait_for_no_relocating_shards`
to set whether the cluster health operation should wait for
all relocating shards to complete relocation.

* Addresses code review comments

* Don't be lenient if `wait_for_relocating_shards` is set
2016-08-31 11:58:19 -04:00
Ali Beyad a21dd80f1b Documentation changes for wait_for_active_shards (#19581)
Documentation changes and migration doc changes for introducing 
wait_for_active_shards and removing write consistency level.

Closes #19581
2016-08-02 09:15:01 -04:00
Glen Smith d7099f05b9 slight clarification 2016-07-07 20:46:18 -04:00
Christoph Wurm d1727653dd Update shrink-index.asciidoc
Fix half-finished sentence
2016-07-05 13:34:58 +02:00
Simon Willnauer b2c4c323e1 Allow `_shrink` to N shards if source shards is a multiple of N (#18699)
Today we allow to shrink to 1 shard but that might not be possible due to
too many document or a single shard doesn't meet the requirements for the index.
The logic can be expanded to N shards if the source index shards is a multiple of N.
This guarantees that there are not hotspots created due to different number of shards
being shrunk into one.
2016-06-07 10:06:41 +02:00
Clinton Gormley e6aaaf11ed Reworked docs for index-shrink API (#18705) 2016-06-03 09:50:51 +02:00
Simon Willnauer 22dfc41521 Only filter intial recovery (post API) when shrinking an index (#18661)
Today we use `index.routing.allocation.include._id` to filter the allocation
for the shrink target index. That has the sideeffect that the user has to
delete that setting / change it once the primary has been recovered (shrink is done)
This PR adds a dedicated filter that can only be set internally that only filters
allocation for unassigned shards.
2016-06-02 15:38:51 +02:00
Simon Willnauer 502a775a7c Add primitive to shrink an index into a single shard (#18270)
This adds a low level primitive operations to shrink an existing
index into a new index with a single shard. This primitive expects
all shards of the source index to allocated on a single node. Once the target index is initializing on the shrink node it takes a snapshot of the source index shards and copies all files into the target indices data folder. An [optimization](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7300) coming in Lucene 6.1 will also allow for optional constant time copy if hard-links are supported by the filesystem. All mappings are merged into the new indexes metadata once the snapshots have been taken on the merge node.

To shrink an existing index all shards must be moved to a single node (one instance of each shard) and the index must be read-only:

```BASH
$ curl -XPUT 'http://localhost:9200/logs/_settings' -d '{
    "settings" : {
        "index.routing.allocation.require._name" : "shrink_node_name",
        "index.blocks.write" : true 
    }
}
```
once all shards are started on the shrink node. the new index can be created via:

```BASH
$ curl -XPUT 'http://localhost:9200/logs/_shrink/logs_single_shard' -d '{
    "settings" : {
        "index.codec" : "best_compression",
        "index.number_of_replicas" : 1
    }
}'
```

This API will perform all needed check before the new index is created and selects the shrink node based on the allocation of the source index. This call returns immediately, to monitor shrink progress the recovery API should be used since all copy operations are reflected in the recovery API with byte copy progress etc.

The shrink operation does not modify the source index, if a shrink operation should
be canceled or if the shrink failed, the target index can simply be deleted and
all resources are released.
2016-05-31 10:41:44 +02:00