We pretended to be able to ackt like a different version node for so long it's
time to be honest and remove this ability. It's just confusing and where needed
and tested we should build dedicated extension points.
This commit introduce unit testing infrastructure to test replication operations using real index shards. This is infra is complementary to the full integration tests and unit testing of ReplicationOperation we already have. The new ESIndexLevelReplicationTestCase base makes it easier to test and simulate failure mode that require real shards and but do not need the full blow stack of a complete node.
The commit also add a simple "nothing is wrong" test plus a test that checks we don't drop docs during the various stages of recovery.
For now, only single doc indexing is supported but this can be easily extended in the future.
This class was forked in 0.20 to remove a volatile keyword. While there
is no issue attached to the commit, no evidence of the criticality of the
change nor does it seem to be correct since we set this value internally as well
I think this class should be used as is from joda time even if we have to pay
the price of volatile reads. We can't do 3rd party optimization in our codebase that
way it just not maintainable.
This was added in 2280915d3c
Perviously we used token level lookbehind in the parser. That worked,
but only if the parser didn't have any ambiguity *at all*. Since the
parser has ambiguity it didn't work everywhere. In particular it failed
when parsing blocks in lambdas like `a -> {int b = a + 2; b * b}`.
This moves the hack from the parser into the lexer. There we can use
token lookbehind (same trick) to *insert* semicolons into the token
stream. This works much better for antlr because antlr's prediction
code can work with real tokens.
Also, the lexer is simpler than the parser, so if there is a place
to introduce a hack, that is a better place.
This commit removes the search preference _only_node as the same
functionality can be obtained by using the search preference
_only_nodes. This commit also adds a test that ensures that _only_nodes
will continue to support specifying node IDs.
Relates #18875
This commit adds a note to the breaking changes docs that since commit
da74323141, thread pool settings are no
longer cluster-level settings and thus not dynamically updatable.
In the past, we had the semantics where the very first cluster state a node processed after joining could not contain shard assignment to it. This was to make sure the node cleans up local / stale shard copies before receiving new ones that might confuse it. Since then a lot of work in this area, most notably the introduction of allocation ids and #17270 . This means we don't have to be careful and just reroute in the same cluster state change where we process the join, keeping things simple and following the same pattern we have in other places.
This change removes some unnecessary dependencies from ClusterService
and cleans up ClusterName creation. ClusterService is now not created
by guice anymore.
Projects that don't depend on elasticsearch-test fail otherwise because org.elasticsearch.test.EsIntegTestCase (default integ test class) is not in the classpath. They should provide their onw integ test base class, but having integration tests should not be mandatory. One can simply set skipIntegTestsInDisguise to true to prevent loading of integ test class.
The NodeJoinController is responsible for processing joins from nodes, both normally and during master election. For both use cases, the class processes incoming joins in batches in order to be efficient and to accumulated enough joins (i.e., >= min_master_nodes) to seal an election and ensure the new cluster state can be committed. Since the class was written, we introduced a new infrastructure to support batch changes to the cluster state at the `ClusterService` level. This commit rewrites NodeJoinController to use that infra and be simpler.
The PR also introduces a new concept to ClusterService allowing to submit tasks in batches, guaranteeing that all tasks submitted in a batch will be processed together (potentially with more tasks). On top of that I added some extra safety checks to the ClusterService, around potential double submission of task objects into the queue.
This is done in preparation to revive #17811