This removes two packages, consolidating them into their parent package
and adds `package-info.java` files to describe all of the packages under
`org.elasticsearch.test.rest`.
While I was working on #18703, I discovered a bad behavior when people don't provide AWS key/secret as part as their `elasticsearch.yml` but rely on SysProps or env. variables...
In [`InternalAwsS3Service#getClient(...)`](d4366f8493/plugins/repository-s3/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cloud/aws/InternalAwsS3Service.java (L76-L141)), we have:
```java
Tuple<String, String> clientDescriptor = new Tuple<>(endpoint, account);
AmazonS3Client client = clients.get(clientDescriptor);
```
But if people don't provide credentials, `account` is `null`.
Even if it actually could work, I think that we should use the `AWSCredentialsProvider` we create later on and extract from it the `account` (AWS KEY actually) and then use it as the second value of the tuple.
Closes#19557.
Consuming the response body to make it part of the exception message means that it may not be readable anymore later, depending on whether the entity is repeatable or not. Turns out that the response body tells a lot about the error itself, and considering that we don't expect bodies to be incredibly big for errors, we can wrap the entity into a BufferedHttpEntity to make it repeatable.
Closes#19622
When you simulate a pipeline without specifying an id against a node where the request is redirected to a master node,
the request and the response is throwing a NPE:
```
java.lang.NullPointerException
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3B9536AC6AA23C06:DD62280CF765DA1F]:0)
at org.elasticsearch.common.io.stream.StreamOutput.writeString(StreamOutput.java:300)
at org.elasticsearch.action.ingest.SimulatePipelineRequest.writeTo(SimulatePipelineRequest.java:92)
at org.elasticsearch.transport.local.LocalTransport.sendRequest(LocalTransport.java:222)
at org.elasticsearch.test.transport.AssertingLocalTransport.sendRequest(AssertingLocalTransport.java:95)
at org.elasticsearch.transport.TransportService.sendRequest(TransportService.java:470)
at org.elasticsearch.action.TransportActionNodeProxy.execute(TransportActionNodeProxy.java:51)
at org.elasticsearch.client.transport.support.TransportProxyClient.lambda$execute$441(TransportProxyClient.java:63)
at org.elasticsearch.client.transport.TransportClientNodesService.execute(TransportClientNodesService.java:233)
at org.elasticsearch.client.transport.support.TransportProxyClient.execute(TransportProxyClient.java:63)
at org.elasticsearch.client.transport.TransportClient.doExecute(TransportClient.java:309)
at org.elasticsearch.client.support.AbstractClient.execute(AbstractClient.java:403)
at org.elasticsearch.client.FilterClient.doExecute(FilterClient.java:67)
at org.elasticsearch.client.support.AbstractClient.execute(AbstractClient.java:403)
at org.elasticsearch.client.support.AbstractClient$ClusterAdmin.execute(AbstractClient.java:710)
at org.elasticsearch.action.ActionRequestBuilder.execute(ActionRequestBuilder.java:80)
at org.elasticsearch.action.ActionRequestBuilder.execute(ActionRequestBuilder.java:54)
at org.elasticsearch.action.ActionRequestBuilder.get(ActionRequestBuilder.java:62)
at org.elasticsearch.ingest.bano.BanoProcessorIntegrationTest.testSimulateProcessorConfigTarget(BanoProcessorIntegrationTest.java:139)
```
This patch fixes this and adds some random tests.
* fix explain in function_score if no function filter matches
When each function in function_score has a filter but none of them matches
we always assume 1 for the combined functions and then combine that with the
sub query score.
But the explanation did not reflect that because in case no function matched
we did not even use the actual score that was computed in the explanation.
* Update gateway.asciidoc
Added a note to clarify that, in cases where nodes in a cluster have different setting, the node that is the elected master takes precedence over anything else.
* Update gateway.asciidoc
Updated as per @bleskes's comments
The reason for this change is that currently if a user specifies e.g.`2M`
meaning 2 months as a time value instead of throwing an exception
explaining that time units in months are not supported (due to months
having variable time spans) we instead will parse this to 2 minutes.
This could be surprising to a user and could mean put a lot of load on
the cluster performing a task that was never intended and whose results
will be useless anyway.
It is generally accepted that `m` indicates minutes and `M` indicates
months with time values so this is consistent with the expectations a
user might have around specifying time units.
A concrete example of where this causes issues is in the decay score
function which uses TimeValue to parse the scale and offset parameters
of the decay into millisecond values to use in the calculation.
Relates to #19619
Currently to use the ResourceWatcherService to watch files, you
implement a FileChangesListener. However, this is a class, not an
interface, even though it has no base state or anything like that, just
defining a few methods. This change converts FileChangesListener to an
interface.
The tests for authentication extend ESIntegTestCase and use a mock
authentication plugin. This way the clients don't have to worry about
running it. Sadly, that means we don't really have good coverage on the
REST portion of the authentication.
This also adds ElasticsearchStatusException, and exception on which you
can set an explicit status. The nice thing about it is that you can
set the RestStatus that it returns to whatever arbitrary status you like
based on the status that comes back from the remote system.
reindex-from-remote then uses it to wrap all remote failures, preserving
the status from the remote Elasticsearch or whatever proxy is between us
and the remove Elasticsearch.