This adds a new `/_cluster/allocation/explain` API that explains why a
shard can or cannot be allocated to nodes in the cluster. Additionally,
it will show where the master *desires* to put the shard, according to
the `ShardsAllocator`.
It looks like this:
```
GET /_cluster/allocation/explain?pretty
{
"index": "only-foo",
"shard": 0,
"primary": false
}
```
Though, you can optionally send an empty body, which means "explain the
allocation for the first unassigned shard you find".
The output when a shard is unassigned looks like this:
```
{
"shard" : {
"index" : "only-foo",
"index_uuid" : "KnW0-zELRs6PK84l0r38ZA",
"id" : 0,
"primary" : false
},
"assigned" : false,
"unassigned_info" : {
"reason" : "INDEX_CREATED",
"at" : "2016-03-22T20:04:23.620Z"
},
"nodes" : {
"V-Spi0AyRZ6ZvKbaI3691w" : {
"node_name" : "Susan Storm",
"node_attributes" : {
"bar" : "baz"
},
"final_decision" : "NO",
"weight" : 0.06666675,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "filter",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "node does not match index include filters [foo:\"bar\"]"
} ]
},
"Qc6VL8c5RWaw1qXZ0Rg57g" : {
"node_name" : "Slipstream",
"node_attributes" : {
"bar" : "baz",
"foo" : "bar"
},
"final_decision" : "NO",
"weight" : -1.3833332,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "same_shard",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "the shard cannot be allocated on the same node id [Qc6VL8c5RWaw1qXZ0Rg57g] on which it already exists"
} ]
},
"PzdyMZGXQdGhqTJHF_hGgA" : {
"node_name" : "The Symbiote",
"node_attributes" : { },
"final_decision" : "NO",
"weight" : 2.3166666,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "filter",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "node does not match index include filters [foo:\"bar\"]"
} ]
}
}
}
```
And when the shard *is* assigned, the output looks like:
```
{
"shard" : {
"index" : "only-foo",
"index_uuid" : "KnW0-zELRs6PK84l0r38ZA",
"id" : 0,
"primary" : true
},
"assigned" : true,
"assigned_node_id" : "Qc6VL8c5RWaw1qXZ0Rg57g",
"nodes" : {
"V-Spi0AyRZ6ZvKbaI3691w" : {
"node_name" : "Susan Storm",
"node_attributes" : {
"bar" : "baz"
},
"final_decision" : "NO",
"weight" : 1.4499999,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "filter",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "node does not match index include filters [foo:\"bar\"]"
} ]
},
"Qc6VL8c5RWaw1qXZ0Rg57g" : {
"node_name" : "Slipstream",
"node_attributes" : {
"bar" : "baz",
"foo" : "bar"
},
"final_decision" : "CURRENTLY_ASSIGNED",
"weight" : 0.0,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "same_shard",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "the shard cannot be allocated on the same node id [Qc6VL8c5RWaw1qXZ0Rg57g] on which it already exists"
} ]
},
"PzdyMZGXQdGhqTJHF_hGgA" : {
"node_name" : "The Symbiote",
"node_attributes" : { },
"final_decision" : "NO",
"weight" : 3.6999998,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "filter",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "node does not match index include filters [foo:\"bar\"]"
} ]
}
}
}
```
Only "NO" decisions are returned by default, but all decisions can be
shown by specifying the `?include_yes_decisions=true` parameter in the
request.
Resolves#14593
https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/17288 added a check to enforce that the `discovery.zen.minimum_master_nodes` configuration is set when nodes have the `host`, `port`, or `bind_host` set in either `transport` or general `network` configuration sections. This was documented incorrectly as "nodes that are bound to a non-loopback interface", which lead to confusion as I set `network.host: "localhost"` and the check was still failing.
This change updates the docs to detail the actual check. I think it also highlights how complex the check is and the need for a simpler solution.
discovery.zen.minimum_master_nodes is the single most important setting to set on a production cluster. We have no way of supplying a good default so it must be set by the user. Binding a node to a public IP (as opposed to the default local host) is a good enough indication that a node will be part of a production cluster cluster and thus it's a good tradeoff to enforce the settings. Note that nothing prevent users from setting it to 1 in a single node cluster.
Closes#17288
We currently have a `discovery.zen.master_election.filter_client` setting that control whether their ping responses are ignored for master election (which is the current default). With the push to treat client nodes as normal nodes (and promote the transport/rest clients for client work), this should be changed. This commit remove this setting and it's companion `discovery.zen.master_election.filter_data` setting (currently defaulting to false) in favor of singe `discovery.zen.master_election.ignore_non_master_pings` setting with more intuitive name (defaulting to false).
Resolves#17325Closes#17329
The available memory metric was always set to `0` since 2.0.beta1 (bug). was left behind but never set. Turns out the section wasn't that useful, as it would only output the total memory available throughout all nodes in the cluster. We decided to remove the section then.
In #17198, we removed suggest transport action, which
used the `suggest` threadpool to execute requests. Now
`suggest` threadpool is unused and suggest requests are
executed on the `search` threadpool.
We can be better at checking `buffer_size` and `chunk_size` for S3 repositories.
For example, we know that:
* `buffer_size` should be more than `5mb`
* `chunk_size` should be no more than `5tb`
* `buffer_size` should be lower than `chunk_size`
Otherwise, setting `buffer_size` is useless.
For the record:
`chunk_size` is a Snapshot setting whatever the implementation is.
`buffer_size` is an S3 implementation setting.
Let say that you are snapshotting a 500mb file. If you set `chunk_size` to `200mb`, then Snapshot service will call S3 repository to snapshot 3 files with the following sizes:
* `200mb`
* `200mb`
* `100mb`
If you set `buffer_size` to `100mb` (AWS maximum size recommendation), the first file of `200mb` will be uploaded on S3 using the multipart feature in 2 chunks and the workflow is basically the following:
* create the multipart request and get back an `id` from AWS S3 platform
* upload part1: `100mb`
* upload part2: `100mb`
* "commit" the full upload using the `id`.
Closes#17244.
Currently if you run an `exists` query on an object, it will resolve all sub
fields and create a disjunction for all those fields. However the `_field_names`
mapper indexes paths for objects so we could query object paths directly.
I also changed the query parser to reject `exists` queries if the `_field_names`
field is disabled since it would be a big performance trap.
In 5.0 we don't allow index settings to be specified on the node level ie.
in yaml files or via commandline argument. This can cause problems during
upgrade if this was used extensively. For instance if analyzers where
specified on a node level this might cause the index to be closed when
imported (see #17187). In such a case all indices relying on this
must be updated via `PUT /${index}/_settings`. Yet, this API has slightly
different semantics since it overrides existing settings. To make this less
painful this change adds a `preserve_existing` parameter on that API to ensure
we have the same semantics as if the setting was applied on the node level.
This change also adds a better error message and a change to the migration guide
to ensure upgrades are smooth if index settings are specified on the node level.
If a index setting is detected this change fails the node startup and prints a message
like this:
```
*************************************************************************************
Found index level settings on node level configuration.
Since elasticsearch 5.x index level settings can NOT be set on the nodes
configuration like the elasticsearch.yaml, in system properties or command line
arguments.In order to upgrade all indices the settings must be updated via the
/${index}/_settings API. Unless all settings are dynamic all indices must be closed
in order to apply the upgradeIndices created in the future should use index templates
to set default values.
Please ensure all required values are updated on all indices by executing:
curl -XPUT 'http://localhost:9200/_all/_settings?preserve_existing=true' -d '{
"index.number_of_shards" : "1",
"index.query.default_field" : "main_field",
"index.translog.durability" : "async",
"index.ttl.disable_purge" : "true"
}'
*************************************************************************************
```
Also replaced the PercolatorQueryRegistry with the new PercolatorQueryCache.
The PercolatorFieldMapper stores the rewritten form of each percolator query's xcontext
in a binary doc values field. This make sure that the query rewrite happens only during
indexing (some queries for example fetch shapes, terms in remote indices) and
the speed up the loading of the queries in the percolator query cache.
Because the percolator now works inside the search infrastructure a number of features
(sorting fields, pagination, fetch features) are available out of the box.
The following feature requests are automatically implemented via this refactoring:
Closes#10741Closes#7297Closes#13176Closes#13978Closes#11264Closes#10741Closes#4317
