Backport support for replicating closed indices (#39499)
Before this change, closed indexes were simply not replicated. It was therefore
possible to close an index and then decommission a data node without knowing
that this data node contained shards of the closed index, potentially leading to
data loss. Shards of closed indices were not completely taken into account when
balancing the shards within the cluster, or automatically replicated through shard
copies, and they were not easily movable from node A to node B using APIs like
Cluster Reroute without being fully reopened and closed again.
This commit changes the logic executed when closing an index, so that its shards
are not just removed and forgotten but are instead reinitialized and reallocated on
data nodes using an engine implementation which does not allow searching or
indexing, which has a low memory overhead (compared with searchable/indexable
opened shards) and which allows shards to be recovered from peer or promoted
as primaries when needed.
This new closing logic is built on top of the new Close Index API introduced in
6.7.0 (#37359). Some pre-closing sanity checks are executed on the shards before
closing them, and closing an index on a 8.0 cluster will reinitialize the index shards
and therefore impact the cluster health.
Some APIs have been adapted to make them work with closed indices:
- Cluster Health API
- Cluster Reroute API
- Cluster Allocation Explain API
- Recovery API
- Cat Indices
- Cat Shards
- Cat Health
- Cat Recovery
This commit contains all the following changes (most recent first):
* c6c42a1 Adapt NoOpEngineTests after #39006
* 3f9993d Wait for shards to be active after closing indices (#38854)
* 5e7a428 Adapt the Cluster Health API to closed indices (#39364)
* 3e61939 Adapt CloseFollowerIndexIT for replicated closed indices (#38767)
* 71f5c34 Recover closed indices after a full cluster restart (#39249)
* 4db7fd9 Adapt the Recovery API for closed indices (#38421)
* 4fd1bb2 Adapt more tests suites to closed indices (#39186)
* 0519016 Add replica to primary promotion test for closed indices (#39110)
* b756f6c Test the Cluster Shard Allocation Explain API with closed indices (#38631)
* c484c66 Remove index routing table of closed indices in mixed versions clusters (#38955)
* 00f1828 Mute CloseFollowerIndexIT.testCloseAndReopenFollowerIndex()
* e845b0a Do not schedule Refresh/Translog/GlobalCheckpoint tasks for closed indices (#38329)
* cf9a015 Adapt testIndexCanChangeCustomDataPath for replicated closed indices (#38327)
* b9becdd Adapt testPendingTasks() for replicated closed indices (#38326)
* 02cc730 Allow shards of closed indices to be replicated as regular shards (#38024)
* e53a9be Fix compilation error in IndexShardIT after merge with master
* cae4155 Relax NoOpEngine constraints (#37413)
* 54d110b [RCI] Adapt NoOpEngine to latest FrozenEngine changes
* c63fd69 [RCI] Add NoOpEngine for closed indices (#33903)
Relates to #33888
This commit moves back to use explicit dependsOn for test tasks on
check. Not all tasks extending RandomizedTestingTask should be run by
check directly.
Closes#35435
- make it easier to add additional testing tasks with the proper configuration and add some where they were missing.
- mute or fix failing tests
- add a check as part of testing conventions to find classes not included in any testing task.
With this change, we apply the common test config automatically to all
newly created tasks instead of opting in specifically.
For plugin authors using the plugin externally this means that the
configuration will be applied to their RandomizedTestingTasks as well.
The purpose of the task is to simplify setup and make it easier to
change projects that use the `test` task but actually run integration
tests to use a task called `integTest` for clarity, but also because
we may want to configure and run them differently.
E.x. using different levels of concurrency.
This commit moves these REST tests (possibly temporarily) to a
sub-project of ccr. We do this (again, possibly temporarily) to keep
them within the ccr sub-project yet there are changes within 6.x that
prevent these from being in the top-level project (the cluster formation
tasks are trying to install x-pack-ccr into the
integ-test-zip). Therefore, we isolate these for now until we can
understand why there are differences between 6.x and master.
Today we are by-hand maintaining a list of CCR QA sub-projects that the
check task depends on. This commit simplifies this by finding these
sub-projects automatically and adding their check task as dependencies
of the CCR check task.
This commit implements licensing for CCR. CCR will require a platinum
license, and administrative endpoints will be disabled when a license is
non-compliant.
Tests shard follow task in the context of a leader and follower ReplicationGroup,
in order to test how the shard follow logic reacts to certain shard related
failure scenarios.
More tests will need to be added, but this indicates what changes need to be made
to have these tests.
Relates to #30102
If security is enabled today with ccr then the follow index api will
fail with the fact that system user does not have privileges to use
the shard changes api. The reason that system user is used is because
the persistent tasks that keep the shards in sync runs in the background
and the user that invokes the follow index api only start those background
processes.
I think it is better that the system user isn't used by the persistent
tasks that keep shards in sync, but rather runs as the same user that
invoked the follow index api and use the permissions that that user has.
This is what this PR does, and this is done by keeping track of
security headers inside the persistent task (similar to how rollup does this).
This PR also adds a cluster ccr priviledge that allows a user to follow
or unfollow an index. Finally if a user that wants to follow an index,
it needs to have read and monitor privileges on the leader index and
monitor and write privileges on the follow index.
The follow index api completely reuses CCS infrastructure that was exposed via:
https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/29495
This means that the leader index parameter support the same ccs index
to indicate that an index resides in a different cluster.
I also added a qa module that smoke tests the cross cluster nature of ccr.
The idea is that this test just verifies that ccr can read data from a
remote leader index and that is it, no crazy randomization or indirectly
testing other features.
This commit enables the run task for ccr by specifying that the ccr
project not be evaluated until after core is evaluated. This is
important since ccr is alphabetically before core and thus Gradle
evaluates it first.
Relates #3665
Tanguy Leroux
Alpar Torok
Ryan Ernst
Jason Tedor
Martijn van Groningen
Nhat Nguyen