* Introduce property to set version qualifier
- VersionProperties.elasticsearch is now a string which can have qualifier
and snapshot too
- The Version class in the build no longer cares about snapshot and
qualifier.
Stop passing `Settings` to `AbstractComponent`'s ctor. This allows us to
stop passing around `Settings` in a *ton* of places. While this change
touches many files, it touches them all in fairly small, mechanical
ways, doing a few things per file:
1. Drop the `super(settings);` line on everything that extends
`AbstractComponent`.
2. Drop the `settings` argument to the ctor if it is no longer used.
3. If the file doesn't use `logger` then drop `extends
AbstractComponent` from it.
4. Clean up all compilation failure caused by the `settings` removal
and drop any now unused `settings` isntances and method arguments.
I've intentionally *not* removed the `settings` argument from a few
files:
1. TransportAction
2. AbstractLifecycleComponent
3. BaseRestHandler
These files don't *need* `settings` either, but this change is large
enough as is.
Relates to #34488
* NETWORKING: MockTransportService Wait for Close
* Make `MockTransportService` wait `30s` for close listeners to run before failing the assertion
* Closes#34990
Today when ESIntegTestCase starts some nodes it writes out the unicast hosts
files each time a node starts its transport service. This does mean that a
number of nodes can start and perform their first pinging round without any
unicast hosts which, if the timing is unlucky and a lot of nodes are all
started at the same time, can lead to a split brain as in #35052.
Prior to #33554 this was unlikely to happen since the MockUncasedHostsProvider
would always have yielded the existing hosts, so the timing would have to have
been implausibly unlucky. Since #33554, however, it's more likely because the
race occurs between the start of the first round of pinging and the writing of
the unicast hosts file. It is realistic that new nodes will be configured with
the existing nodes from startup, so this change reinstates that behaviour.
Closes#35052.
The java yaml test runner supports sending request headers, yet not all clients support headers. This commit makes sure that we enforce adding a skip section with feature "headers" whenever headers are used in a do section as part of a test. That decreases the chance for new tests to break client builds due to the missing skip section.
Closes#34650
This PR renames the CRUD APIS for ILM
GET _ilm/<policy>, _ilm -> _ilm/policy/<policy>, _ilm/policy
PUT _ilm/<policy> -> _ilm/policy/<policy>
DELETE _ilm/<policy> -> _ilm/policy/<policy>
closes#34929.
Drops the `Settings` member from `AbstractComponent`, moving it from the
base class on to the classes that use it. For the most part this is a
mechanical change that doesn't drop `Settings` accesses. The one
exception to this is naming threads where it switches from an invocation
that passes `Settings` and extracts the node name to one that explicitly
passes the node name.
This change doesn't drop the `Settings` argument from
`AbstractComponent`'s ctor because this change is big enough as is.
We'll do that in a follow up change.
This commit filters out usage of deprecated tzs by tests. These are
tested separately and should not require checking for warnings on any
test using random timezones.
closes#34188
Validation of test sections and suites consists of checking that the proper skip features sections are in place depending on the features used in tests.
The validation logic was previously only performed on do sections included in each test section, and the skip needed to be present in the same test section. What happens often though is that the skip is added to the setup section, or the teardown section.
This commit improves the validation of test suites by validating setup and teardown section first, then looking at each test section while still eventually reading the skip section from setup or teardown.
We are also making SkipSection, SetupSection, TearDownSection, ClientYamlTestSection and ClientYamlTestSuite immutable. Previously it was possible to utilize constants like SetupSection.EMPTY, which were modifiable and affect every other future users by modifiying them. This has been corrected.
Also, validation has been improved to cumulate errors so that all the errors from a suite will be listed at once.
Relates to #34735
This commit adds a new single value metric aggregation that calculates
the statistic called median absolute deviation, which is a measure of
variability that works on more types of data than standard deviation
Our calculation of MAD is approximated using t-digests. In the collect
phase, we collect each value visited into a t-digest. In the reduce
phase, we merge all value t-digests, then create a t-digest of
deviations using the first t-digest's median and centroids
Bulk Request in High level rest client should be consistent with what is
possible in Rest API, therefore should support global parameters. Global
parameters are passed in URL in Rest API.
Some parameters are mandatory - index, type - and would fail validation
if not provided before before the bulk is executed.
Optional parameters - routing, pipeline.
The usage of these should be consistent across sync/async execution,
bulk processor and BulkRequestBuilder
closes#26026
`AbstractComponent` is trouble because its name implies that
*everything* should extend from it. It *is* useful, but maybe too
broadly useful. The things it offers access too, the `Settings` instance
for the entire server and a logger are nice to have around, but not
really needed *everywhere*. The `Settings` instance especially adds a
fair bit of ceremony to testing without any value.
This removes the `nodeName` method from `AbstractComponent` so it is
more clear where we actually need the node name.
In order to remove Streamable from the codebase, Response objects need
to be read using the Writeable.Reader interface which this change
enables. This change enables the use of Writeable.Reader by adding the
`Action#getResponseReader` method. The default implementation simply
uses the existing `newResponse` method and the readFrom method. As
responses are migrated to the Writeable.Reader interface, Action
classes can be updated to throw an UnsupportedOperationException when
`newResponse` is called and override the `getResponseReader` method.
Relates #34389
This is a forward port of a change made to clean up backwards
compatibility for the rollup cleanups. It makes the version of each node
available very early on in test execution. The 6.x version of the change
used those versions to control the cleanup backwards compatibility but
that isn't needed in this branch. But having the versions around *is*
useful. So this makes them available.
Closes#34629
This is related to #30876. The AbstractSimpleTransportTestCase initiates
many tcp connections. There are normally over 1,000 connections in
TIME_WAIT at the end of the test. This is because every test opens at
least two different transports that connect to each other with 13
channel connection profiles. This commit modifies the default
connection profile used by this test to 6. One connection for each
type, except for REG which gets 2 connections.
The contains syntax was added in #30874 but the skips were not properly
put in place.
The java runner has the feature so the tests will run as part of the
build, but language clients will be able to support it at their own
pace.
We throw parsing exception when an unknown array is found, but we don't when an unknown top-level field is found. This commit makes sure that unsupported top-level fields are not ignored in a do section.
Closes#34651
#33708 introduced a strict deprecation mode that makes a REST request
fail if there is a warning header in the response returned by
Elasticsearch (usually a deprecation message signaling that a feature
or a field has been deprecated).
This change adds the strict deprecation mode into the REST integration
tests, and makes the tests fail if a deprecated feature is used. Also
any test using a deprecated feature has been modified to pass the build.
The YAML integration tests already analyzed HTTP warnings so they do
not use this mode, keeping their "expected vs actual" behavior.
In #34407, we supposed to clone the list of replicas of ReplicationGroup
when computing replication targets, but somehow we missed it. If we
don't clone the list, a WriteReplicationAction may use an old
ReplicationTargets which consists replicas which are removed from the
current list of replicas
Relates #34407Closes#33457
- Restrict visibility of Aggregators and Factories
- Move PipelineAggregatorBuilders up a level so it is consistent with
AggregatorBuilders
- Checkstyle line length fixes for a few classes
- Minor odds/ends (swapping to method references, formatting, etc)
We should delete a job by directly talking to the allocated
task and telling it to shutdown. Today we shut down a job
via the persistent task framework. This is not ideal because,
while the job has been removed from the persistent task
CS, the allocated task continues to live until it gets the
shutdown message.
This means a user can delete a job, immediately delete
the rollup index, and then see new documents appear in
the just-deleted index. This happens because the indexer
in the allocated task is still running and indexes a few
more documents before getting the shutdown command.
In this PR, the transport action is changed to a TransportTasksAction,
and we invoke onCancelled() directly on the matching job.
The race condition still exists after this PR (albeit less likely),
but this was a precursor to fixing the issue and a self-contained
chunk of code. A second PR will followup to fix the race itself.
In some of our X-Pack REST tests we have to wait for pending tasks to
complete. We are now needing this functionality in ESRestTestCase for
the docs tests where we run against X-Pack features. This commit moves
the helper method that we have in X-Pack to ESRestTestCase, and removes
duplicate logic from waiting for rollup tasks to complete.
Since #34288, we might hit deadlock if the FollowTask has more fetchers
than writers. This can happen in the following scenario:
Suppose the leader has two operations [seq#0, seq#1]; the FollowTask has
two fetchers and one writer.
1. The FollowTask issues two concurrent fetch requests: {from_seq_no: 0,
num_ops:1} and {from_seq_no: 1, num_ops:1} to read seq#0 and seq#1
respectively.
2. The second request which fetches seq#1 completes before, and then it
triggers a write request containing only seq#1.
3. The primary of a follower fails after it has replicated seq#1 to
replicas.
4. Since the old primary did not respond, the FollowTask issues another
write request containing seq#1 (resend the previous write request).
5. The new primary has seq#1 already; thus it won't replicate seq#1 to
replicas but will wait for the global checkpoint to advance at least
seq#1.
The problem is that the FollowTask has only one writer and that writer
is waiting for seq#0 which won't be delivered until the writer completed.
This PR proposes to replicate existing operations with the old primary
term (instead of the current term) on the follower. In particular, when
the following primary detects that it has processed an process already,
it will look up the term of an existing operation with the same seq_no
in the Lucene index, then rewrite that operation with the old term
before replicating it to the following replicas. This approach is
wait-free but requires soft-deletes on the follower.
Relates #34288
With this commit we cleanup hand-coded duplicate checks in XContent
parsing. They were necessary previously but since we reconfigured the
underlying parser in #22073 and #22225, these checks are obsolete and
were also ineffective unless an undocumented system property has been
set. As we also remove this escape hatch, we can remove the additional
checks as well.
Closes#22253
Relates #34588
Today, WriteReplicationAction uses a set of replication targets directly
from the primary shard of ReplicationGroup. It should be fine except
when we add/remove or promote a shard while a write action is executing.
We have encountered these two issues:
1. Replicas are not found in the replication targets. This happens
because we remove replicas but the WriteReplicationAction still uses the
old replication targets which include the removed replicas.
2. Access ReplicationGroup from a primary shard which hasn't activated
the primary-mode yet. This is because we won't activate the primary-mode
for a promoting shard after bumping the primary term which is executed
asynchronously.
This commit captures the replication targets when the replication group
is ready and continue using those targets until we re-compute the new
targets after the group is changed.
Closes#33457
Colin Goodheart-Smithe
Alpar Torok
Julie Tibshirani
Tal Levy
Nik Everett
Igor Motov
Seong-hyun, Oh
Armin Braun
David Turner
Luca Cavanna
Ryan Ernst
Andy Bristol
Przemyslaw Gomulka
Pratik Sanglikar
Jay Modi
Tim Brooks
Lee Hinman
lipsill
Nhat Nguyen
Zachary Tong
Jason Tedor
Daniel Mitterdorfer