The current response format is:
```
{
"pattern1": {
...
},
"pattern2": {
...
}
}
```
The new format is:
```
{
"patterns": [
{
"name": "pattern1",
"pattern": {
...
}
},
{
"name": "pattern2",
"pattern": {
...
}
}
]
}
```
This format is more structured and more friendly for parsing and generating specs.
This is a breaking change, but it is better to do this now while ccr
is still a beta feature than later.
Follow up from #36049
Add a more detailed section about what exceptions to expect from the blocking
calls in this class and removing the mostly redundant mentions of the
IOExceptions from each method javadoc since it doesn't give much details about
the expected exceptions anyway.
Closes#30334
AutoFollowCoordinator should take into account that after auto following
an index and while updating that a leader index has been followed, that
the auto follow pattern may have been removed via delete auto follow patterns
api.
Also fixed a bug that when a remote cluster connection has been removed,
the auto follow coordinator does not die when it tries get a remote client for
that cluster.
Closes#35480
`PreferHasAttributeNodeSelector` works like exactly like
`HasAttributeNodeSelector` but if not nodes match the attribute
then it will not filter the list of nodes.
- Add the authentication realm and lookup realm name and type in the response for the _authenticate API
- The authentication realm is set as the lookup realm too (instead of setting the lookup realm to null or empty ) when no lookup realm is used.
* [Rollup] Add more diagnostic stats to job
To help debug future performance issues, this adds the
min/max/avg/count/total latencies (in milliseconds) for search
and bulk phase. This latency is the total service time including
transfer between nodes, not just the `took` time.
It also adds the count of search/bulk failures encountered during
runtime. This information is also in the log, but a runtime counter
will help expose problems faster
* review cleanup
* Remove dead ParseFields
step times were set. The assumption was that these are always set.
Tests passed, which led me to believe this was true. There is a time
when shrunk indices have their step phase/action/step details set,
but with no time information (in the CopyExecutionStateStep).
Explain API fails for these
added validation for complete information of step details.
also changed the rendering of explain responses so null strings are not rendered
Another thing that I changed is the format of the client-side response. I found it difficult to maintain the two subtly-different objects, so I migrated the usage of long for the fields, to Long (just as it is on the server-side).
Update PutUserRequest to support password_hash (see: #35242)
This also updates the documentation to bring it in line with our more
recent approach to HLRC docs.
We didn't check that the ExplainLifecycleRequest was constructed with at least
one index before, now that we do we must also make sure the tests
mutateInstance() method used in equals/hashCode checks doesn't accidentally
create an empty index array.
Closes#35822
Previously, it was possible to initialize a request
that does not include any indices. This results in undefined
behavior when generating the URL path to send to ES. By
enforcing indices to be defined, users will be more explicit
about the intention.
This commit removes the parsing code from the PostStartBasicResponse server variant. It also makes the server response implement StatusToXContent which allows us to save a couple of lines of code in the corredponding REST action.
Relates to #35547
