Relates #29827
This implementation behaves like the current transport client, that you basically cannot configure a Watch POJO representation as an argument to the put watch API, but only a bytes reference. You can use the the `WatchSourceBuilder` from the `org.elasticsearch.plugin:x-pack-core` dependency to build watches.
This commit also changes the license type to trial, so that watcher is available in high level rest client tests.
/cc @hub-cap
This is the first x-pack API we're adding to the high level REST client
so there is a lot to talk about here!
= Open source
The *client* for these APIs is open source. We're taking the previously
Elastic licensed files used for the `Request` and `Response` objects and
relicensing them under the Apache 2 license.
The implementation of these features is staying under the Elastic
license. This lines up with how the rest of the Elasticsearch language
clients work.
= Location of the new files
We're moving all of the `Request` and `Response` objects that we're
relicensing to the `x-pack/protocol` directory. We're adding a copy of
the Apache 2 license to the root fo the `x-pack/protocol` directory to
line up with the language in the root `LICENSE.txt` file. All files in
this directory will have the Apache 2 license header as well. We don't
want there to be any confusion. Even though the files are under the
`x-pack` directory, they are Apache 2 licensed.
We chose this particular directory layout because it keeps the X-Pack
stuff together and easier to think about.
= Location of the API in the REST client
We've been following the layout of the rest-api-spec files for other
APIs and we plan to do this for the X-Pack APIs with one exception:
we're dropping the `xpack` from the name of most of the APIs. So
`xpack.graph.explore` will become `graph().explore()` and
`xpack.license.get` will become `license().get()`.
`xpack.info` and `xpack.usage` are special here though because they
don't belong to any proper category. For now I'm just calling
`xpack.info` `xPackInfo()` and intend to call usage `xPackUsage` though
I'm not convinced that this is the final name for them. But it does get
us started.
= Jars, jars everywhere!
This change makes the `xpack:protocol` project a `compile` scoped
dependency of the `x-pack:plugin:core` and `client:rest-high-level`
projects. I intend to keep it a compile scoped dependency of
`x-pack:plugin:core` but I intend to bundle the contents of the protocol
jar into the `client:rest-high-level` jar in a follow up. This change
has grown large enough at this point.
In that followup I'll address javadoc issues as well.
= Breaking-Java
This breaks that transport client by a few classes around. We've
traditionally been ok with doing this to the transport client.
Added support to the high-level rest client for the create snapshot API call. This required
several changes to toXContent which may need to be cleaned up in a later PR. Also
added several parsers for fromXContent to be able to retrieve appropriate responses
along with tests.
Given the weirdness of the response returned by the get alias API, we went for a client specific response, which allows us to hold the error message, exception and status returned as part of the response together with aliases. See #30536 .
Relates to #27205
* Initial commit of rest high level exposure of cancel task
* fix javadocs
* address some code review comments
* update branch to use tasks namespace instead of cluster
* High-level client: list tasks failure to not lose nodeId
This commit reworks testing for `ListTasksResponse` so that random
fields insertion can be tested and xcontent equivalence can be checked
too. Proper exclusions need to be configured, and failures need to be
tested separately. This helped finding a little problem, whenever there
is a node failure returned, the nodeId was lost as it was never printed
out as part of the exception toXContent.
* added comment
* merge from master
* re-work CancelTasksResponseTests to separate XContent failure cases from non-failure cases
* remove duplication of logic in parser creation
* code review changes
* refactor TasksClient to support RequestOptions
* add tests for parent task id
* address final PR review comments, mostly formatting and such
This commit adds Verify Repository, the associated docs and tests for
the high level REST API client. A few small changes to the Verify
Repository Response went into the commit as well.
Relates #27205
Our API spec define the tasks API as e.g. tasks.list, meaning that they belong to their own namespace. This commit moves them from the cluster namespace to their own namespace.
Relates to #29546
This commit adds Delete Repository, the associated docs and tests for
the high level REST API client. It also cleans up a seemingly innocuous
line in the RestDeleteRepositoryAction and some naming in SnapshotIT.
Relates #27205
This change adds a `listTasks` method to the high level java
ClusterClient which allows listing running tasks through the
task management API.
Related to #27205
This commit adds Create Repository, the associated docs and tests
for the high level REST API client. A few small changes to the
PutRepository Request and Response went into the commit as well.
This commit adds the Snapshot Client with a first API call within it,
the get repositories call in snapshot/restore module. This also creates
a snapshot namespace for the docs, as well as get repositories docs.
Relates #27205
This PR adds support for the Get Settings API to the java high-level rest client.
Furthermore, logic related to the retrieval of default settings has been moved from the rest layer into the transport layer and now default settings may be retrieved consistency via both the rest API and the transport API.
Adds docs for `HighLevelRestClient#multiSearch`. Unlike the `multiGet`
docs these are much more sparse because multi-search doesn't support
setting many options on the `MultiSearchRequest` and instead just wraps
a list of `SearchRequest`s.
Closes#28389
The current "Building Queries" and "Building Aggregations" pages are
located under the "Supported Apis" section because they are linked to
the "Search API" page.
It should instead be in a dedicated section: this commit adds a new
"Using Java Builders" section and renames few filenames in favor of
more meaningful names.