The request and response classes have been extracted from `IndexUpgradeInfoAction` into top-level classes, and moved to the protocol jar. The `UpgradeActionRequired` enum is also moved.
Relates to #29827
- Expose x-pack usage docs page which was not linked in supported-apis page
- make watcher a top-level dir outside of x-pack directory
- move x-pack info and usage pages to miscellaneous
- add new Watcher category to supported-apis (they were under miscellaneous)
- remove x-pack prefix from watcher docs titles
Rest HL client: Add get license action
Continues to use String instead of a more complex License class to
hold the license text similarly to put license.
Relates #29827
In the HL REST client we replace the License object with a string, because of
complexity of this class. It is also not really needed on the client side since
end-users are not interacting with the license besides passing it as a string
to the server.
Relates #29827
Relates #29827
This implementation behaves like the current transport client, that you basically cannot configure a Watch POJO representation as an argument to the put watch API, but only a bytes reference. You can use the the `WatchSourceBuilder` from the `org.elasticsearch.plugin:x-pack-core` dependency to build watches.
This commit also changes the license type to trial, so that watcher is available in high level rest client tests.
/cc @hub-cap
Make SnapshotInfo and CreateSnapshotResponse parsers lenient for backwards compatibility. Remove extraneous fields from CreateSnapshotRequest toXContent.
This commit adds the _xpack/usage api to the high level rest client.
Currently in the transport api, the usage data is exposed in a limited
fashion, at most giving one level of helper methods for the inner keys
of data, but then exposing thos subobjects as maps of objects. Rather
than making parsers for every set of usage data from each feature, this
PR exposes the entire set of usage data as a map of maps.
It looks like we weren't clear on when and why you should close the high
level client and folks were closing it after every request which is not
efficient. This explains why you should close the client and when so
this shouldn't be as common.
Closes#32001
This is the first x-pack API we're adding to the high level REST client
so there is a lot to talk about here!
= Open source
The *client* for these APIs is open source. We're taking the previously
Elastic licensed files used for the `Request` and `Response` objects and
relicensing them under the Apache 2 license.
The implementation of these features is staying under the Elastic
license. This lines up with how the rest of the Elasticsearch language
clients work.
= Location of the new files
We're moving all of the `Request` and `Response` objects that we're
relicensing to the `x-pack/protocol` directory. We're adding a copy of
the Apache 2 license to the root fo the `x-pack/protocol` directory to
line up with the language in the root `LICENSE.txt` file. All files in
this directory will have the Apache 2 license header as well. We don't
want there to be any confusion. Even though the files are under the
`x-pack` directory, they are Apache 2 licensed.
We chose this particular directory layout because it keeps the X-Pack
stuff together and easier to think about.
= Location of the API in the REST client
We've been following the layout of the rest-api-spec files for other
APIs and we plan to do this for the X-Pack APIs with one exception:
we're dropping the `xpack` from the name of most of the APIs. So
`xpack.graph.explore` will become `graph().explore()` and
`xpack.license.get` will become `license().get()`.
`xpack.info` and `xpack.usage` are special here though because they
don't belong to any proper category. For now I'm just calling
`xpack.info` `xPackInfo()` and intend to call usage `xPackUsage` though
I'm not convinced that this is the final name for them. But it does get
us started.
= Jars, jars everywhere!
This change makes the `xpack:protocol` project a `compile` scoped
dependency of the `x-pack:plugin:core` and `client:rest-high-level`
projects. I intend to keep it a compile scoped dependency of
`x-pack:plugin:core` but I intend to bundle the contents of the protocol
jar into the `client:rest-high-level` jar in a follow up. This change
has grown large enough at this point.
In that followup I'll address javadoc issues as well.
= Breaking-Java
This breaks that transport client by a few classes around. We've
traditionally been ok with doing this to the transport client.
This is a followup to #31537. It makes a number of changes requested by
a review that came after the PR was merged. These are mostly cleanups
and doc improvements.
Added support to the high-level rest client for the create snapshot API call. This required
several changes to toXContent which may need to be cleaned up in a later PR. Also
added several parsers for fromXContent to be able to retrieve appropriate responses
along with tests.
We have made node selectors configurable per request, but all
of other language clients don't allow for that.
A good reason not to do so, is that having a different node selector
per request breaks round-robin. This commit makes NodeSelector
configurable only at client initialization. It also improves the docs
on this matter, important given that a single node selector can still
affect round-robin.
Add a `NodeSelector` so that users can filter the nodes that receive
requests based on node attributes.
I believe we'll need this to backport #30523 and we want it anyway.
I also added a bash script to help with rebuilding the sniffer parsing
test documents.
With #29331 we added support for the cluster health API to the
high-level REST client. The transport client does not support the level
parameter, and it always returns all the info needed for shards level
rendering. We have maintained that behaviour when adding support for
cluster health to the high-level REST client, to ease migration, but the
correct thing to do is to default the high-level REST client to
`cluster` level, which is the same default as when going through the
Elasticsearch REST layer.
Given the weirdness of the response returned by the get alias API, we went for a client specific response, which allows us to hold the error message, exception and status returned as part of the response together with aliases. See #30536 .
Relates to #27205
Allows users of the Low Level REST client to specify which hosts a
request should be run on. They implement the `NodeSelector` interface
or reuse a built in selector like `NOT_MASTER_ONLY` to chose which nodes
are valid. Using it looks like:
```
Request request = new Request("POST", "/foo/_search");
RequestOptions options = request.getOptions().toBuilder();
options.setNodeSelector(NodeSelector.NOT_MASTER_ONLY);
request.setOptions(options);
...
```
This introduces a new `Node` object which contains a `HttpHost` and the
metadata about the host. At this point that metadata is just `version`
and `roles` but I plan to add node attributes in a followup. The
canonical way to **get** this metadata is to use the `Sniffer` to pull
the information from the Elasticsearch cluster.
I've marked this as "breaking-java" because it breaks custom
implementations of `HostsSniffer` by renaming the interface to
`NodesSniffer` and by changing it from returning a `List<HttpHost>` to a
`List<Node>`. It *shouldn't* break anyone else though.
Because we expect to find it useful, this also implements `host_selector`
support to `do` statements in the yaml tests. Using it looks a little
like:
```
---
"example test":
- skip:
features: host_selector
- do:
host_selector:
version: " - 7.0.0" # same syntax as skip
apiname:
something: true
```
The `do` section parses the `version` string into a host selector that
uses the same version comparison logic as the `skip` section. When the
`do` section is executed it passed the off to the `RestClient`, using
the `ElasticsearchHostsSniffer` to sniff the required metadata.
The idea is to use this in mixed version tests to target a specific
version of Elasticsearch so we can be sure about the deprecation
logging though we don't currently have any examples that need it. We do,
however, have at least one open pull request that requires something
like this to properly test it.
Closes#21888
* Initial commit of rest high level exposure of cancel task
* fix javadocs
* address some code review comments
* update branch to use tasks namespace instead of cluster
* High-level client: list tasks failure to not lose nodeId
This commit reworks testing for `ListTasksResponse` so that random
fields insertion can be tested and xcontent equivalence can be checked
too. Proper exclusions need to be configured, and failures need to be
tested separately. This helped finding a little problem, whenever there
is a node failure returned, the nodeId was lost as it was never printed
out as part of the exception toXContent.
* added comment
* merge from master
* re-work CancelTasksResponseTests to separate XContent failure cases from non-failure cases
* remove duplication of logic in parser creation
* code review changes
* refactor TasksClient to support RequestOptions
* add tests for parent task id
* address final PR review comments, mostly formatting and such
This commit adds Verify Repository, the associated docs and tests for
the high level REST API client. A few small changes to the Verify
Repository Response went into the commit as well.
Relates #27205
Benjamin Trent
David Roberts
Yannick Welsch
Luca Cavanna
Igor Motov
Mayya Sharipova
debadair
Daniel Mitterdorfer
Alexander Reelsen
Jack Conradson
Ryan Ernst
Nik Everett
James Baiera
Alan Woodward
Tim Brooks
Sohaib Iftikhar
Lee Hinman
markharwood
Yu
Vladimir Dolzhenko
Van0SS
olcbean
Nhat Nguyen
Paul Sanwald
Michael Basnight