[[position-increment-gap]] === `position_increment_gap` <> text fields take term <> into account, in order to be able to support <>. When indexing text fields with multiple values a "fake" gap is added between the values to prevent most phrase queries from matching across the values. The size of this gap is configured using `position_increment_gap` and defaults to `100`. For example: [source,js] -------------------------------------------------- PUT my_index/_doc/1 { "names": [ "John Abraham", "Lincoln Smith"] } GET my_index/_search { "query": { "match_phrase": { "names": { "query": "Abraham Lincoln" <1> } } } } GET my_index/_search { "query": { "match_phrase": { "names": { "query": "Abraham Lincoln", "slop": 101 <2> } } } } -------------------------------------------------- // CONSOLE <1> This phrase query doesn't match our document which is totally expected. <2> This phrase query matches our document, even though `Abraham` and `Lincoln` are in separate strings, because `slop` > `position_increment_gap`. The `position_increment_gap` can be specified in the mapping. For instance: [source,js] -------------------------------------------------- PUT my_index { "mappings": { "_doc": { "properties": { "names": { "type": "text", "position_increment_gap": 0 <1> } } } } } PUT my_index/_doc/1 { "names": [ "John Abraham", "Lincoln Smith"] } GET my_index/_search { "query": { "match_phrase": { "names": "Abraham Lincoln" <2> } } } -------------------------------------------------- // CONSOLE <1> The first term in the next array element will be 0 terms apart from the last term in the previous array element. <2> The phrase query matches our document which is weird, but its what we asked for in the mapping.