OpenSearch/docs/reference/mapping/fields/all-field.asciidoc

353 lines
8.7 KiB
Plaintext

[[mapping-all-field]]
=== `_all` field
The `_all` field is a special _catch-all_ field which concatenates the values
of all of the other fields into one big string, using space as a delimiter, which is then
<<analysis,analyzed>> and indexed, but not stored. This means that it can be
searched, but not retrieved.
The `_all` field allows you to search for values in documents without knowing
which field contains the value. This makes it a useful option when getting
started with a new dataset. For instance:
[source,js]
--------------------------------
PUT my_index/user/1 <1>
{
"first_name": "John",
"last_name": "Smith",
"date_of_birth": "1970-10-24"
}
GET my_index/_search
{
"query": {
"match": {
"_all": "john smith 1970"
}
}
}
--------------------------------
// AUTOSENSE
<1> The `_all` field will contain the terms: [ `"john"`, `"smith"`, `"1970"`, `"10"`, `"24"` ]
[NOTE]
.All values treated as strings
=============================================================================
The `date_of_birth` field in the above example is recognised as a `date` field
and so will index a single term representing `1970-10-24 00:00:00 UTC`. The
`_all` field, however, treats all values as strings, so the date value is
indexed as the three string terms: `"1970"`, `"24"`, `"10"`.
It is important to note that the `_all` field combines the original values
from each field as a string. It does not combine the _terms_ from each field.
=============================================================================
The `_all` field is just a <<text,`text`>> field, and accepts the same
parameters that other string fields accept, including `analyzer`,
`term_vectors`, `index_options`, and `store`.
The `_all` field can be useful, especially when exploring new data using
simple filtering. However, by concatenating field values into one big string,
the `_all` field loses the distinction between short fields (more relevant)
and long fields (less relevant). For use cases where search relevance is
important, it is better to query individual fields specifically.
The `_all` field is not free: it requires extra CPU cycles and uses more disk
space. If not needed, it can be completely <<disabling-all-field,disabled>> or
customised on a <<include-in-all,per-field basis>>.
[[querying-all-field]]
==== Using the `_all` field in queries
The <<query-dsl-query-string-query,`query_string`>> and
<<query-dsl-simple-query-string-query,`simple_query_string`>> queries query
the `_all` field by default, unless another field is specified:
[source,js]
--------------------------------
GET _search
{
"query": {
"query_string": {
"query": "john smith 1970"
}
}
}
--------------------------------
// AUTOSENSE
The same goes for the `?q=` parameter in <<search-uri-request, URI search
requests>> (which is rewritten to a `query_string` query internally):
[source,js]
--------------------------------
GET _search?q=john+smith+1970
--------------------------------
Other queries, such as the <<query-dsl-match-query,`match`>> and
<<query-dsl-term-query,`term`>> queries require you to specify
the `_all` field explicitly, as per the
<<mapping-all-field,first example>>.
[[disabling-all-field]]
==== Disabling the `_all` field
The `_all` field can be completely disabled per-type by setting `enabled` to
`false`:
[source,js]
--------------------------------
PUT my_index
{
"mappings": {
"type_1": { <1>
"properties": {...}
},
"type_2": { <2>
"_all": {
"enabled": false
},
"properties": {...}
}
}
}
--------------------------------
// AUTOSENSE
<1> The `_all` field in `type_1` is enabled.
<2> The `_all` field in `type_2` is completely disabled.
If the `_all` field is disabled, then URI search requests and the
`query_string` and `simple_query_string` queries will not be able to use it
for queries (see <<querying-all-field>>). You can configure them to use a
different field with the `index.query.default_field` setting:
[source,js]
--------------------------------
PUT my_index
{
"mappings": {
"my_type": {
"_all": {
"enabled": false <1>
},
"properties": {
"content": {
"type": "text"
}
}
}
},
"settings": {
"index.query.default_field": "content" <2>
},
}
--------------------------------
// AUTOSENSE
<1> The `_all` field is disabled for the `my_type` type.
<2> The `query_string` query will default to querying the `content` field in this index.
[[excluding-from-all]]
==== Excluding fields from `_all`
Individual fields can be included or excluded from the `_all` field with the
<<include-in-all,`include_in_all`>> setting.
[[all-field-and-boosting]]
==== Index boosting and the `_all` field
Individual fields can be _boosted_ at index time, with the <<mapping-boost,`boost`>>
parameter. The `_all` field takes these boosts into account:
[source,js]
--------------------------------
PUT myindex
{
"mappings": {
"mytype": {
"properties": {
"title": { <1>
"type": "text",
"boost": 2
},
"content": { <1>
"type": "text"
}
}
}
}
}
--------------------------------
// AUTOSENSE
<1> When querying the `_all` field, words that originated in the
`title` field are twice as relevant as words that originated in
the `content` field.
WARNING: Using index-time boosting with the `_all` field has a significant
impact on query performance. Usually the better solution is to query fields
individually, with optional query time boosting.
[[custom-all-fields]]
==== Custom `_all` fields
While there is only a single `_all` field per index, the <<copy-to,`copy_to`>>
parameter allows the creation of multiple __custom `_all` fields__. For
instance, `first_name` and `last_name` fields can be combined together into
the `full_name` field:
[source,js]
--------------------------------
PUT myindex
{
"mappings": {
"mytype": {
"properties": {
"first_name": {
"type": "text",
"copy_to": "full_name" <1>
},
"last_name": {
"type": "text",
"copy_to": "full_name" <1>
},
"full_name": {
"type": "text"
}
}
}
}
}
PUT myindex/mytype/1
{
"first_name": "John",
"last_name": "Smith"
}
GET myindex/_search
{
"query": {
"match": {
"full_name": "John Smith"
}
}
}
--------------------------------
// AUTOSENSE
<1> The `first_name` and `last_name` values are copied to the `full_name` field.
[[highlighting-all-field]]
==== Highlighting and the `_all` field
A field can only be used for <<search-request-highlighting,highlighting>> if
the original string value is available, either from the
<<mapping-source-field,`_source`>> field or as a stored field.
The `_all` field is not present in the `_source` field and it is not stored by
default, and so cannot be highlighted. There are two options. Either
<<all-field-store,store the `_all` field>> or highlight the
<<all-highlight-fields,original fields>>.
[[all-field-store]]
===== Store the `_all` field
If `store` is set to `true`, then the original field value is retrievable and
can be highlighted:
[source,js]
--------------------------------
PUT myindex
{
"mappings": {
"mytype": {
"_all": {
"store": true
}
}
}
}
PUT myindex/mytype/1
{
"first_name": "John",
"last_name": "Smith"
}
GET _search
{
"query": {
"match": {
"_all": "John Smith"
}
},
"highlight": {
"fields": {
"_all": {}
}
}
}
--------------------------------
// AUTOSENSE
Of course, storing the `_all` field will use significantly more disk space
and, because it is a combination of other fields, it may result in odd
highlighting results.
The `_all` field also accepts the `term_vector` and `index_options`
parameters, allowing the use of the fast vector highlighter and the postings
highlighter.
[[all-highlight-fields]]
===== Highlight original fields
You can query the `_all` field, but use the original fields for highlighting as follows:
[source,js]
--------------------------------
PUT myindex
{
"mappings": {
"mytype": {
"_all": {}
}
}
}
PUT myindex/mytype/1
{
"first_name": "John",
"last_name": "Smith"
}
GET _search
{
"query": {
"match": {
"_all": "John Smith" <1>
}
},
"highlight": {
"fields": {
"*_name": { <2>
"require_field_match": "false" <3>
}
}
}
}
--------------------------------
// AUTOSENSE
<1> The query inspects the `_all` field to find matching documents.
<2> Highlighting is performed on the two name fields, which are available from the `_source`.
<3> The query wasn't run against the name fields, so set `require_field_match` to `false`.