267 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
267 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
[[elasticsearch-intro]]
|
||
== What is {es}?
|
||
_**You know, for search (and analysis)**_
|
||
|
||
{es} is the distributed search and analytics engine at the heart of
|
||
the {stack}. {ls} and {beats} facilitate collecting, aggregating, and
|
||
enriching your data and storing it in {es}. {kib} enables you to
|
||
interactively explore, visualize, and share insights into your data and manage
|
||
and monitor the stack. {es} is where the indexing, search, and analysis
|
||
magic happens.
|
||
|
||
{es} provides near real-time search and analytics for all types of data. Whether you
|
||
have structured or unstructured text, numerical data, or geospatial data,
|
||
{es} can efficiently store and index it in a way that supports fast searches.
|
||
You can go far beyond simple data retrieval and aggregate information to discover
|
||
trends and patterns in your data. And as your data and query volume grows, the
|
||
distributed nature of {es} enables your deployment to grow seamlessly right
|
||
along with it.
|
||
|
||
While not _every_ problem is a search problem, {es} offers speed and flexibility
|
||
to handle data in a wide variety of use cases:
|
||
|
||
* Add a search box to an app or website
|
||
* Store and analyze logs, metrics, and security event data
|
||
* Use machine learning to automatically model the behavior of your data in real
|
||
time
|
||
* Automate business workflows using {es} as a storage engine
|
||
* Manage, integrate, and analyze spatial information using {es} as a geographic
|
||
information system (GIS)
|
||
* Store and process genetic data using {es} as a bioinformatics research tool
|
||
|
||
We’re continually amazed by the novel ways people use search. But whether
|
||
your use case is similar to one of these, or you're using {es} to tackle a new
|
||
problem, the way you work with your data, documents, and indices in {es} is
|
||
the same.
|
||
|
||
[[documents-indices]]
|
||
=== Data in: documents and indices
|
||
|
||
{es} is a distributed document store. Instead of storing information as rows of
|
||
columnar data, {es} stores complex data structures that have been serialized
|
||
as JSON documents. When you have multiple {es} nodes in a cluster, stored
|
||
documents are distributed across the cluster and can be accessed immediately
|
||
from any node.
|
||
|
||
When a document is stored, it is indexed and fully searchable in <<near-real-time,near real-time>>--within 1 second. {es} uses a data structure called an
|
||
inverted index that supports very fast full-text searches. An inverted index
|
||
lists every unique word that appears in any document and identifies all of the
|
||
documents each word occurs in.
|
||
|
||
An index can be thought of as an optimized collection of documents and each
|
||
document is a collection of fields, which are the key-value pairs that contain
|
||
your data. By default, {es} indexes all data in every field and each indexed
|
||
field has a dedicated, optimized data structure. For example, text fields are
|
||
stored in inverted indices, and numeric and geo fields are stored in BKD trees.
|
||
The ability to use the per-field data structures to assemble and return search
|
||
results is what makes {es} so fast.
|
||
|
||
{es} also has the ability to be schema-less, which means that documents can be
|
||
indexed without explicitly specifying how to handle each of the different fields
|
||
that might occur in a document. When dynamic mapping is enabled, {es}
|
||
automatically detects and adds new fields to the index. This default
|
||
behavior makes it easy to index and explore your data--just start
|
||
indexing documents and {es} will detect and map booleans, floating point and
|
||
integer values, dates, and strings to the appropriate {es} data types.
|
||
|
||
Ultimately, however, you know more about your data and how you want to use it
|
||
than {es} can. You can define rules to control dynamic mapping and explicitly
|
||
define mappings to take full control of how fields are stored and indexed.
|
||
|
||
Defining your own mappings enables you to:
|
||
|
||
* Distinguish between full-text string fields and exact value string fields
|
||
* Perform language-specific text analysis
|
||
* Optimize fields for partial matching
|
||
* Use custom date formats
|
||
* Use data types such as `geo_point` and `geo_shape` that cannot be automatically
|
||
detected
|
||
|
||
It’s often useful to index the same field in different ways for different
|
||
purposes. For example, you might want to index a string field as both a text
|
||
field for full-text search and as a keyword field for sorting or aggregating
|
||
your data. Or, you might choose to use more than one language analyzer to
|
||
process the contents of a string field that contains user input.
|
||
|
||
The analysis chain that is applied to a full-text field during indexing is also
|
||
used at search time. When you query a full-text field, the query text undergoes
|
||
the same analysis before the terms are looked up in the index.
|
||
|
||
[[search-analyze]]
|
||
=== Information out: search and analyze
|
||
|
||
While you can use {es} as a document store and retrieve documents and their
|
||
metadata, the real power comes from being able to easily access the full suite
|
||
of search capabilities built on the Apache Lucene search engine library.
|
||
|
||
{es} provides a simple, coherent REST API for managing your cluster and indexing
|
||
and searching your data. For testing purposes, you can easily submit requests
|
||
directly from the command line or through the Developer Console in {kib}. From
|
||
your applications, you can use the
|
||
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/index.html[{es} client]
|
||
for your language of choice: Java, JavaScript, Go, .NET, PHP, Perl, Python
|
||
or Ruby.
|
||
|
||
[discrete]
|
||
[[search-data]]
|
||
==== Searching your data
|
||
|
||
The {es} REST APIs support structured queries, full text queries, and complex
|
||
queries that combine the two. Structured queries are
|
||
similar to the types of queries you can construct in SQL. For example, you
|
||
could search the `gender` and `age` fields in your `employee` index and sort the
|
||
matches by the `hire_date` field. Full-text queries find all documents that
|
||
match the query string and return them sorted by _relevance_—how good a
|
||
match they are for your search terms.
|
||
|
||
In addition to searching for individual terms, you can perform phrase searches,
|
||
similarity searches, and prefix searches, and get autocomplete suggestions.
|
||
|
||
Have geospatial or other numerical data that you want to search? {es} indexes
|
||
non-textual data in optimized data structures that support
|
||
high-performance geo and numerical queries.
|
||
|
||
You can access all of these search capabilities using {es}'s
|
||
comprehensive JSON-style query language (<<query-dsl, Query DSL>>). You can also
|
||
construct <<sql-overview, SQL-style queries>> to search and aggregate data
|
||
natively inside {es}, and JDBC and ODBC drivers enable a broad range of
|
||
third-party applications to interact with {es} via SQL.
|
||
|
||
[discrete]
|
||
[[analyze-data]]
|
||
==== Analyzing your data
|
||
|
||
{es} aggregations enable you to build complex summaries of your data and gain
|
||
insight into key metrics, patterns, and trends. Instead of just finding the
|
||
proverbial “needle in a haystack”, aggregations enable you to answer questions
|
||
like:
|
||
|
||
* How many needles are in the haystack?
|
||
* What is the average length of the needles?
|
||
* What is the median length of the needles, broken down by manufacturer?
|
||
* How many needles were added to the haystack in each of the last six months?
|
||
|
||
You can also use aggregations to answer more subtle questions, such as:
|
||
|
||
* What are your most popular needle manufacturers?
|
||
* Are there any unusual or anomalous clumps of needles?
|
||
|
||
Because aggregations leverage the same data-structures used for search, they are
|
||
also very fast. This enables you to analyze and visualize your data in real time.
|
||
Your reports and dashboards update as your data changes so you can take action
|
||
based on the latest information.
|
||
|
||
What’s more, aggregations operate alongside search requests. You can search
|
||
documents, filter results, and perform analytics at the same time, on the same
|
||
data, in a single request. And because aggregations are calculated in the
|
||
context of a particular search, you’re not just displaying a count of all
|
||
size 70 needles, you’re displaying a count of the size 70 needles
|
||
that match your users' search criteria--for example, all size 70 _non-stick
|
||
embroidery_ needles.
|
||
|
||
[discrete]
|
||
[[more-features]]
|
||
===== But wait, there’s more
|
||
|
||
Want to automate the analysis of your time series data? You can use
|
||
{ml-docs}/ml-overview.html[machine learning] features to create accurate
|
||
baselines of normal behavior in your data and identify anomalous patterns. With
|
||
machine learning, you can detect:
|
||
|
||
* Anomalies related to temporal deviations in values, counts, or frequencies
|
||
* Statistical rarity
|
||
* Unusual behaviors for a member of a population
|
||
|
||
And the best part? You can do this without having to specify algorithms, models,
|
||
or other data science-related configurations.
|
||
|
||
[[scalability]]
|
||
=== Scalability and resilience: clusters, nodes, and shards
|
||
++++
|
||
<titleabbrev>Scalability and resilience</titleabbrev>
|
||
++++
|
||
|
||
{es} is built to be always available and to scale with your needs. It does this
|
||
by being distributed by nature. You can add servers (nodes) to a cluster to
|
||
increase capacity and {es} automatically distributes your data and query load
|
||
across all of the available nodes. No need to overhaul your application, {es}
|
||
knows how to balance multi-node clusters to provide scale and high availability.
|
||
The more nodes, the merrier.
|
||
|
||
How does this work? Under the covers, an {es} index is really just a logical
|
||
grouping of one or more physical shards, where each shard is actually a
|
||
self-contained index. By distributing the documents in an index across multiple
|
||
shards, and distributing those shards across multiple nodes, {es} can ensure
|
||
redundancy, which both protects against hardware failures and increases
|
||
query capacity as nodes are added to a cluster. As the cluster grows (or shrinks),
|
||
{es} automatically migrates shards to rebalance the cluster.
|
||
|
||
There are two types of shards: primaries and replicas. Each document in an index
|
||
belongs to one primary shard. A replica shard is a copy of a primary shard.
|
||
Replicas provide redundant copies of your data to protect against hardware
|
||
failure and increase capacity to serve read requests
|
||
like searching or retrieving a document.
|
||
|
||
The number of primary shards in an index is fixed at the time that an index is
|
||
created, but the number of replica shards can be changed at any time, without
|
||
interrupting indexing or query operations.
|
||
|
||
[discrete]
|
||
[[it-depends]]
|
||
==== It depends...
|
||
|
||
There are a number of performance considerations and trade offs with respect
|
||
to shard size and the number of primary shards configured for an index. The more
|
||
shards, the more overhead there is simply in maintaining those indices. The
|
||
larger the shard size, the longer it takes to move shards around when {es}
|
||
needs to rebalance a cluster.
|
||
|
||
Querying lots of small shards makes the processing per shard faster, but more
|
||
queries means more overhead, so querying a smaller
|
||
number of larger shards might be faster. In short...it depends.
|
||
|
||
As a starting point:
|
||
|
||
* Aim to keep the average shard size between a few GB and a few tens of GB. For
|
||
use cases with time-based data, it is common to see shards in the 20GB to 40GB
|
||
range.
|
||
|
||
* Avoid the gazillion shards problem. The number of shards a node can hold is
|
||
proportional to the available heap space. As a general rule, the number of
|
||
shards per GB of heap space should be less than 20.
|
||
|
||
The best way to determine the optimal configuration for your use case is
|
||
through https://www.elastic.co/elasticon/conf/2016/sf/quantitative-cluster-sizing[
|
||
testing with your own data and queries].
|
||
|
||
[discrete]
|
||
[[disaster-ccr]]
|
||
==== In case of disaster
|
||
|
||
For performance reasons, the nodes within a cluster need to be on the same
|
||
network. Balancing shards in a cluster across nodes in different data centers
|
||
simply takes too long. But high-availability architectures demand that you avoid
|
||
putting all of your eggs in one basket. In the event of a major outage in one
|
||
location, servers in another location need to be able to take over. Seamlessly.
|
||
The answer? {ccr-cap} (CCR).
|
||
|
||
CCR provides a way to automatically synchronize indices from your primary cluster
|
||
to a secondary remote cluster that can serve as a hot backup. If the primary
|
||
cluster fails, the secondary cluster can take over. You can also use CCR to
|
||
create secondary clusters to serve read requests in geo-proximity to your users.
|
||
|
||
{ccr-cap} is active-passive. The index on the primary cluster is
|
||
the active leader index and handles all write requests. Indices replicated to
|
||
secondary clusters are read-only followers.
|
||
|
||
[discrete]
|
||
[[admin]]
|
||
==== Care and feeding
|
||
|
||
As with any enterprise system, you need tools to secure, manage, and
|
||
monitor your {es} clusters. Security, monitoring, and administrative features
|
||
that are integrated into {es} enable you to use {kibana-ref}/introduction.html[{kib}]
|
||
as a control center for managing a cluster. Features like <<rollup-overview,
|
||
data rollups>> and <<index-lifecycle-management, index lifecycle management>>
|
||
help you intelligently manage your data over time.
|