240 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
240 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
[role="xpack"]
|
|
[testenv="platinum"]
|
|
[[ml-configuring-categories]]
|
|
=== Detecting anomalous categories of data
|
|
|
|
Categorization is a {ml} process that tokenizes a text field, clusters similar
|
|
data together, and classifies it into categories. It works best on
|
|
machine-written messages and application output that typically consist of
|
|
repeated elements. For example, it works well on logs that contain a finite set
|
|
of possible messages:
|
|
|
|
//Obtained from it_ops_new_app_logs.json
|
|
[source,js]
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
{"@timestamp":1549596476000,
|
|
"message":"org.jdbi.v2.exceptions.UnableToExecuteStatementException: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLTimeoutException: Statement cancelled due to timeout or client request [statement:\"SELECT id, customer_id, name, force_disabled, enabled FROM customers\"]",
|
|
"type":"logs"}
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
//NOTCONSOLE
|
|
|
|
Categorization is tuned to work best on data like log messages by taking token
|
|
order into account, including stop words, and not considering synonyms in its
|
|
analysis. Complete sentences in human communication or literary text (for
|
|
example email, wiki pages, prose, or other human-generated content) can be
|
|
extremely diverse in structure. Since categorization is tuned for machine data,
|
|
it gives poor results for human-generated data. It would create so many
|
|
categories that they couldn't be handled effectively. Categorization is _not_
|
|
natural language processing (NLP).
|
|
|
|
When you create a categorization {anomaly-job}, the {ml} model learns what
|
|
volume and pattern is normal for each category over time. You can then detect
|
|
anomalies and surface rare events or unusual types of messages by using
|
|
<<ml-count-functions,count>> or <<ml-rare-functions,rare>> functions.
|
|
|
|
In {kib}, there is a categorization wizard to help you create this type of
|
|
{anomaly-job}. For example, the following job generates categories from the
|
|
contents of the `message` field and uses the count function to determine when
|
|
certain categories are occurring at anomalous rates:
|
|
|
|
[role="screenshot"]
|
|
image::images/ml-category-wizard.jpg["Creating a categorization job in Kibana"]
|
|
|
|
[%collapsible]
|
|
.API example
|
|
====
|
|
[source,console]
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
PUT _ml/anomaly_detectors/it_ops_app_logs
|
|
{
|
|
"description" : "IT ops application logs",
|
|
"analysis_config" : {
|
|
"categorization_field_name": "message",<1>
|
|
"bucket_span":"30m",
|
|
"detectors" :[{
|
|
"function":"count",
|
|
"by_field_name": "mlcategory"<2>
|
|
}]
|
|
},
|
|
"data_description" : {
|
|
"time_field":"@timestamp"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
// TEST[skip:needs-licence]
|
|
<1> This field is used to derive categories.
|
|
<2> The categories are used in a detector by setting `by_field_name`,
|
|
`over_field_name`, or `partition_field_name` to the keyword `mlcategory`. If you
|
|
do not specify this keyword in one of those properties, the API request fails.
|
|
====
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can use the **Anomaly Explorer** in {kib} to view the analysis results:
|
|
|
|
[role="screenshot"]
|
|
image::images/ml-category-anomalies.jpg["Categorization results in the Anomaly Explorer"]
|
|
|
|
For this type of job, the results contain extra information for each anomaly:
|
|
the name of the category (for example, `mlcategory 2`) and examples of the
|
|
messages in that category. You can use these details to investigate occurrences
|
|
of unusually high message counts.
|
|
|
|
If you use the advanced {anomaly-job} wizard in {kib} or the
|
|
{ref}/ml-put-job.html[create {anomaly-jobs} API], there are additional
|
|
configuration options. For example, the optional `categorization_examples_limit`
|
|
property specifies the maximum number of examples that are stored in memory and
|
|
in the results data store for each category. The default value is `4`. Note that
|
|
this setting does not affect the categorization; it just affects the list of
|
|
visible examples. If you increase this value, more examples are available, but
|
|
you must have more storage available. If you set this value to `0`, no examples
|
|
are stored.
|
|
|
|
Another advanced option is the `categorization_filters` property, which can
|
|
contain an array of regular expressions. If a categorization field value matches
|
|
the regular expression, the portion of the field that is matched is not taken
|
|
into consideration when defining categories. The categorization filters are
|
|
applied in the order they are listed in the job configuration, which enables you
|
|
to disregard multiple sections of the categorization field value. In this
|
|
example, you might create a filter like `[ "\\[statement:.*\\]"]` to remove the
|
|
SQL statement from the categorization algorithm.
|
|
|
|
[discrete]
|
|
[[ml-configuring-analyzer]]
|
|
==== Customizing the categorization analyzer
|
|
|
|
Categorization uses English dictionary words to identify log message categories.
|
|
By default, it also uses English tokenization rules. For this reason, if you use
|
|
the default categorization analyzer, only English language log messages are
|
|
supported, as described in the <<ml-limitations>>.
|
|
|
|
If you use the categorization wizard in {kib}, you can see which categorization
|
|
analyzer it uses and highlighted examples of the tokens that it identifies. You
|
|
can also change the tokenization rules by customizing the way the categorization
|
|
field values are interpreted:
|
|
|
|
[role="screenshot"]
|
|
image::images/ml-category-analyzer.jpg["Editing the categorization analyzer in Kibana"]
|
|
|
|
The categorization analyzer can refer to a built-in {es} analyzer or a
|
|
combination of zero or more character filters, a tokenizer, and zero or more
|
|
token filters. In this example, adding a
|
|
{ref}/analysis-pattern-replace-charfilter.html[`pattern_replace` character filter]
|
|
achieves exactly the same behavior as the `categorization_filters` job
|
|
configuration option described earlier. For more details about these properties,
|
|
see the
|
|
{ref}/ml-put-job.html#ml-put-job-request-body[`categorization_analyzer` API object].
|
|
|
|
If you use the default categorization analyzer in {kib} or omit the
|
|
`categorization_analyzer` property from the API, the following default values
|
|
are used:
|
|
|
|
[source,console]
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
POST _ml/anomaly_detectors/_validate
|
|
{
|
|
"analysis_config" : {
|
|
"categorization_analyzer" : {
|
|
"tokenizer" : "ml_classic",
|
|
"filter" : [
|
|
{ "type" : "stop", "stopwords": [
|
|
"Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday", "Saturday", "Sunday",
|
|
"Mon", "Tue", "Wed", "Thu", "Fri", "Sat", "Sun",
|
|
"January", "February", "March", "April", "May", "June", "July", "August", "September", "October", "November", "December",
|
|
"Jan", "Feb", "Mar", "Apr", "May", "Jun", "Jul", "Aug", "Sep", "Oct", "Nov", "Dec",
|
|
"GMT", "UTC"
|
|
] }
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"categorization_field_name": "message",
|
|
"detectors" :[{
|
|
"function":"count",
|
|
"by_field_name": "mlcategory"
|
|
}]
|
|
},
|
|
"data_description" : {
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you specify any part of the `categorization_analyzer`, however, any omitted
|
|
sub-properties are _not_ set to default values.
|
|
|
|
The `ml_classic` tokenizer and the day and month stopword filter are more or
|
|
less equivalent to the following analyzer, which is defined using only built-in
|
|
{es} {ref}/analysis-tokenizers.html[tokenizers] and
|
|
{ref}/analysis-tokenfilters.html[token filters]:
|
|
|
|
[source,console]
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
PUT _ml/anomaly_detectors/it_ops_new_logs3
|
|
{
|
|
"description" : "IT Ops Application Logs",
|
|
"analysis_config" : {
|
|
"categorization_field_name": "message",
|
|
"bucket_span":"30m",
|
|
"detectors" :[{
|
|
"function":"count",
|
|
"by_field_name": "mlcategory",
|
|
"detector_description": "Unusual message counts"
|
|
}],
|
|
"categorization_analyzer":{
|
|
"tokenizer": {
|
|
"type" : "simple_pattern_split",
|
|
"pattern" : "[^-0-9A-Za-z_.]+" <1>
|
|
},
|
|
"filter": [
|
|
{ "type" : "pattern_replace", "pattern": "^[0-9].*" }, <2>
|
|
{ "type" : "pattern_replace", "pattern": "^[-0-9A-Fa-f.]+$" }, <3>
|
|
{ "type" : "pattern_replace", "pattern": "^[^0-9A-Za-z]+" }, <4>
|
|
{ "type" : "pattern_replace", "pattern": "[^0-9A-Za-z]+$" }, <5>
|
|
{ "type" : "stop", "stopwords": [
|
|
"",
|
|
"Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday", "Saturday", "Sunday",
|
|
"Mon", "Tue", "Wed", "Thu", "Fri", "Sat", "Sun",
|
|
"January", "February", "March", "April", "May", "June", "July", "August", "September", "October", "November", "December",
|
|
"Jan", "Feb", "Mar", "Apr", "May", "Jun", "Jul", "Aug", "Sep", "Oct", "Nov", "Dec",
|
|
"GMT", "UTC"
|
|
] }
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"analysis_limits":{
|
|
"categorization_examples_limit": 5
|
|
},
|
|
"data_description" : {
|
|
"time_field":"time",
|
|
"time_format": "epoch_ms"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
// TEST[skip:needs-licence]
|
|
|
|
<1> Tokens basically consist of hyphens, digits, letters, underscores and dots.
|
|
<2> By default, categorization ignores tokens that begin with a digit.
|
|
<3> By default, categorization also ignores tokens that are hexadecimal numbers.
|
|
<4> Underscores, hyphens, and dots are removed from the beginning of tokens.
|
|
<5> Underscores, hyphens, and dots are also removed from the end of tokens.
|
|
|
|
The key difference between the default `categorization_analyzer` and this
|
|
example analyzer is that using the `ml_classic` tokenizer is several times
|
|
faster. The difference in behavior is that this custom analyzer does not include
|
|
accented letters in tokens whereas the `ml_classic` tokenizer does, although
|
|
that could be fixed by using more complex regular expressions.
|
|
|
|
If you are categorizing non-English messages in a language where words are
|
|
separated by spaces, you might get better results if you change the day or month
|
|
words in the stop token filter to the appropriate words in your language. If you
|
|
are categorizing messages in a language where words are not separated by spaces,
|
|
you must use a different tokenizer as well in order to get sensible
|
|
categorization results.
|
|
|
|
It is important to be aware that analyzing for categorization of machine
|
|
generated log messages is a little different from tokenizing for search.
|
|
Features that work well for search, such as stemming, synonym substitution, and
|
|
lowercasing are likely to make the results of categorization worse. However, in
|
|
order for drill down from {ml} results to work correctly, the tokens that the
|
|
categorization analyzer produces must be similar to those produced by the search
|
|
analyzer. If they are sufficiently similar, when you search for the tokens that
|
|
the categorization analyzer produces then you find the original document that
|
|
the categorization field value came from.
|