2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
# Triage Process and Github Labels for Angular 2
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 17:10:01 -04:00
|
|
|
This document describes how the Angular team uses labels and milestones
|
|
|
|
to triage issues on github. The basic idea of the new process is that
|
|
|
|
caretaker only assigns a component and type (bug, feature) label. The
|
|
|
|
owner of the component than is in full control of how the issues should
|
|
|
|
be triaged further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once this process is implemented and in use, we will revisit it to see
|
|
|
|
if further labeling is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A caretaker should be able to determine which component the issue
|
|
|
|
belongs to. The components have a clear piece of source code associated
|
|
|
|
with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `comp: animations`: `@matsko`
|
|
|
|
* `comp: benchpress`: `@tbosch`
|
2016-10-04 19:13:32 -04:00
|
|
|
* `comp: build & ci`: `@IgorMinar` -- All build and CI scripts
|
2016-09-07 17:10:01 -04:00
|
|
|
* `comp: common`: `@mhevery` -- This includes core components / pipes.
|
2016-10-04 19:13:32 -04:00
|
|
|
* `comp: core & compiler`: `@tbosch` -- Because core and compiler are very
|
2016-09-07 17:10:01 -04:00
|
|
|
intertwined, we will be treating them as one.
|
|
|
|
* `comp: forms`: `@kara`
|
|
|
|
* `comp: http`: `@jeffbcross`
|
|
|
|
* `comp: i18n`: `@vicb`
|
|
|
|
* `comp: metadata-extractor`: `@chuckjaz`
|
|
|
|
* `comp: router`: `@vsavkin`
|
|
|
|
* `comp: testing`: `@juliemr`
|
|
|
|
* `comp: upgrade`: `@mhevery`
|
|
|
|
* `comp: web-worker`: `@vicb`
|
2016-10-04 19:13:32 -04:00
|
|
|
* `comp: zones`: `@mhevery`
|
2016-09-07 17:10:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are few components which are cross-cutting. They don't have
|
|
|
|
a clear location in the source tree. We will treat them as a component
|
|
|
|
even thought no specific source tree is associated with them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `comp: documentation`: `@naomiblack`
|
2016-10-04 19:13:32 -04:00
|
|
|
* `comp: packaging`: `@IgorMinar`
|
2016-09-07 17:10:01 -04:00
|
|
|
* `comp: performance`: `@tbosch`
|
|
|
|
* `comp: security`: `@IgorMinar`
|
2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 17:10:01 -04:00
|
|
|
## Type
|
|
|
|
What kind of problem is this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `type: RFC / discussion / question`
|
|
|
|
* `type: bug`
|
|
|
|
* `type: chore`
|
|
|
|
* `type: feature`
|
|
|
|
* `type: performance`
|
|
|
|
* `type: refactor`
|
2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 17:10:01 -04:00
|
|
|
## Caretaker Triage Process
|
2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 17:10:01 -04:00
|
|
|
It is the caretaker's responsibility to assign `comp: *` and `type: *`
|
|
|
|
to each new issue as they come in. The reason why we limit the
|
|
|
|
responsibility of the caretaker to these two labels is that it is
|
|
|
|
unlikely that without domain knowledge the caretaker could add any
|
|
|
|
additional labels of value.
|
2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 17:10:01 -04:00
|
|
|
## Component's owner Triage Process
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At this point we are leaving each component owner to determine their own
|
|
|
|
process for their component.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It will be up to the component owner to determine the order in which the
|
|
|
|
issues within the component will be resolved.
|
2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Assigning Issues to Milestones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any issue that is being worked on must have:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* An `assignee`: The person doing the work.
|
|
|
|
* A `Milestone`: When we expect to complete this work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We aim to only have at most three milestones open at a time:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Closing Milestone: A milestone with a very small number of issues, about to release.
|
|
|
|
* Current Milestone: Work that we plan to complete within one week.
|
|
|
|
* Next Milestone: Work that is > 1 week but current for the team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The [backlog](https://github.com/angular/angular/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+no%3Amilestone)
|
|
|
|
consists of all issues that have been triaged but do not have an assignee or milestone.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-07 17:10:01 -04:00
|
|
|
## Triaged vs Untrained PRs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRs should also be label with a `comp: *` so that it is clear which
|
|
|
|
primary area the PR effects.
|
2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because of the cumulative pain associated with rebasing PRs, we triage PRs daily, and
|
|
|
|
closing or reviewing PRs is a top priority ahead of other ongoing work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every triaged PR must have a `pr_action` label assigned to it and an assignee:
|
|
|
|
|
2015-08-10 14:45:50 -04:00
|
|
|
* `pr_action: review` -- work is complete and comment is needed from the assignee.
|
2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
* `pr_action: cleanup` -- more work is needed from the current assignee.
|
|
|
|
* `pr_action: discuss` -- discussion is needed, to be led by the current assignee.
|
2015-08-10 14:45:50 -04:00
|
|
|
* `pr_action: merge` -- the PR should be merged. Add this to a PR when you would like to
|
|
|
|
trigger automatic merging following a successful build. This is described in [COMMITTER.md](COMMITTER.md).
|
2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-08-10 14:45:50 -04:00
|
|
|
In addition, PRs can have the following states:
|
2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `pr_state: LGTM` -- PR may have outstanding changes but does not require further review.
|
|
|
|
* `pr_state: WIP` -- PR is experimental or rapidly changing. Not ready for review or triage.
|
|
|
|
* `pr_state: blocked` -- PR is blocked on an issue or other PR. Not ready for review or triage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that an LGTM state does not mean a PR is ready to merge: for example, a reviewer might set the
|
|
|
|
LGTM state but request a minor tweak that doesn't need further review, e.g., a rebase or small
|
|
|
|
uncontroversial change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRs do not need to be assigned to milestones, unless a milestone release should be held for that
|
|
|
|
PR to land.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Special Labels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### action:design
|
2015-06-03 23:44:50 -04:00
|
|
|
More active discussion is needed before the issue can be worked on further. Typically used for
|
|
|
|
`type: feature` or `type: RFC/discussion/question`
|
2015-06-03 16:04:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[See all issues that need discussion](https://github.com/angular/angular/labels/action:%20Design)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### cla
|
|
|
|
Managed by googlebot. Indicates whether a PR has a CLA on file for its author(s). Only issues with
|
|
|
|
`cla:yes` should be merged into master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### WORKS_AS_INTENDED
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-05 14:20:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Only used on closed issues, to indicate to the reporter why we closed it.
|