docs: changed wording for loadChildren per reviewer comments on PR (#26733)

PR Close #26733
This commit is contained in:
jenniferfell 2019-04-24 17:24:05 -06:00 committed by Andrew Kushnir
parent 8b0ebe17b3
commit 169d51beb8
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ The following APIs are announced as deprecated in version 8:
| @angular/core | [defineInjectable](api/core/defineInjectable) | `ɵɵdefineInjectable` | v8 | Used only in generated code. |
| @angular/core | [inject](api/core/inject) | `ɵɵinject` | v8 | Used only in generated code. |
The string syntax for the `loadChildren` route specification is deprecated in Angular version 8, in favor of new syntax that uses an `import` statement. For more information, see [loadChildren string syntax](#loadChildren) below.
The string syntax for the `loadChildren` route specification is deprecated in Angular version 8, in favor of new `import()` syntax. For more information, see [loadChildren string syntax](#loadChildren) below.
## Deprecated APIs
@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ For more information, see [/deep/, >>>, and ::ng-deep](guide/component-styles#de
{@a template-tag}
### <template> tag
The `<template>` tag was deprecated in v4 to avoid colliding with the DOM's element of the same name (such as when using web components). Use `<ng-template>` instead. For more information, see the [AOT Compliation](guide/aot-compiler#enablelegacytemplate) guide.
The `<template>` tag was deprecated in v4 to avoid colliding with the DOM's element of the same name (such as when using web components). Use `<ng-template>` instead. For more information, see the [Ahead-of-Time Compilation](guide/aot-compiler#enablelegacytemplate) guide.
@ -286,9 +286,9 @@ If you use these `Deprecated*` pipes, you should migrate to the current APIs lis
{@a loadChildren}
### loadChildren string syntax
When Angular first introduced lazy routes, there wasn't browser support for dynamically loading additional JavaScript. Angular created our own scheme using the syntax `loadChildren: './lazy/lazy.module#LazyModule'` and built tooling to support it. Now that ECMAScript dynamic import is a standard and is supported in many browsers, it's time for Angular applications to use this new syntax.
When Angular first introduced lazy routes, there wasn't browser support for dynamically loading additional JavaScript. Angular created our own scheme using the syntax `loadChildren: './lazy/lazy.module#LazyModule'` and built tooling to support it. Now that ECMAScript dynamic import is supported in many browsers, Angular is moving toward this new syntax.
In v8, the string syntax for the [`loadChildren`](api/router/LoadChildren) route specification was deprecated, in favor of new syntax that uses an `import` statement.
In v8, the string syntax for the [`loadChildren`](api/router/LoadChildren) route specification was deprecated, in favor of new syntax that uses `import()` syntax.
Before:
@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ After:
```
const routes: Routes = [{
path: 'lazy',
// The new import syntax
// The new import() syntax
loadChildren: () => import('./lazy/lazy.module').then(m => m.LazyModule)
}];
```
@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ const routes: Routes = [{
<div class="alert is-helpful">
**v8 update**: When you update to version 8, the [`ng update`](cli/update) command performs the transformation automatically.
**v8 update**: When you update to version 8, the [`ng update`](cli/update) command performs the transformation automatically. Prior to version 7, the `import()` syntax works in JIT mode (with view engine).
**Ivy:** If you are using Ivy, you must update your lazy routes to the new dynamic import syntax. See the [Ivy guide](guide/ivy) for more information.