docs(TRIAGE_AND_LABELS): update labels to reflect the current state
This commit is contained in:
parent
319ce182db
commit
8f5836cb14
|
@ -1,48 +1,51 @@
|
|||
# Triage Process and Github Labels for Angular
|
||||
# Triage Process and GitHub Labels for Angular
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes how the Angular team uses labels and milestones
|
||||
This document describes how the Angular team uses labels and milestones
|
||||
to triage issues on github. The basic idea of the process is that
|
||||
caretaker only assigns a component and type (bug, feature) label. The
|
||||
owner of the component than is in full control of how the issues should
|
||||
caretaker only assigns a component and type (bug, feature) label. The
|
||||
owner of the component than is in full control of how the issues should
|
||||
be triaged further.
|
||||
|
||||
Once this process is implemented and in use, we will revisit it to see
|
||||
Once this process is implemented and in use, we will revisit it to see
|
||||
if further labeling is needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Components
|
||||
## Label Types
|
||||
|
||||
A caretaker should be able to determine which component the issue
|
||||
### Components
|
||||
|
||||
A caretaker should be able to determine which component the issue
|
||||
belongs to. The components have a clear piece of source code associated
|
||||
with it.
|
||||
with it within the `/packages/` folder of this repo.
|
||||
|
||||
* `comp: animations`: `@matsko`
|
||||
* `comp: benchpress`: `@tbosch`
|
||||
* `comp: build & ci`: `@IgorMinar` -- All build and CI scripts
|
||||
* `comp: common`: `@mhevery` -- This includes core components / pipes.
|
||||
* `comp: core & compiler`: `@tbosch` -- Because core and compiler are very
|
||||
intertwined, we will be treating them as one.
|
||||
* `comp: forms`: `@kara`
|
||||
* `comp: http`: `@jeffbcross`
|
||||
* `comp: i18n`: `@vicb`
|
||||
* `comp: language service`: `@chuckjaz`
|
||||
* `comp: metadata-extractor`: `@chuckjaz`
|
||||
* `comp: router`: `@vicb`
|
||||
* `comp: testing`: `@juliemr`
|
||||
* `comp: upgrade`: `@mhevery`
|
||||
* `comp: web-worker`: `@vicb`
|
||||
* `comp: zones`: `@mhevery`
|
||||
* `comp: aio` - the angular.io application
|
||||
* `comp: animations`
|
||||
* `comp: benchpress`
|
||||
* `comp: common` - this includes core components / pipes
|
||||
* `comp: core, compiler` - because core, compiler, compiler-cli and
|
||||
browser-platforms are very intertwined, we will be treating them as one
|
||||
* `comp: forms`
|
||||
* `comp: http`
|
||||
* `comp: i18n`
|
||||
* `comp: language service`
|
||||
* `comp: router`
|
||||
* `comp: testing`
|
||||
* `comp: upgrade`
|
||||
* `comp: web-worker`
|
||||
* `comp: zones`
|
||||
|
||||
There are few components which are cross-cutting. They don't have
|
||||
a clear location in the source tree. We will treat them as a component
|
||||
even thought no specific source tree is associated with them.
|
||||
|
||||
* `comp: docs`: `@naomiblack`
|
||||
* `comp: packaging`: `@IgorMinar`
|
||||
* `comp: performance`: `@tbosch`
|
||||
* `comp: security`: `@IgorMinar`
|
||||
* `comp: build & ci` - all build and CI scripts
|
||||
* `comp: docs` - documentation, including API docs, guides, tutorial
|
||||
* `comp: packaging`
|
||||
* `comp: performance`
|
||||
* `comp: security`
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Type
|
||||
### Type
|
||||
|
||||
What kind of problem is this?
|
||||
|
||||
* `type: RFC / discussion / question`
|
||||
|
@ -95,62 +98,49 @@ These criteria are then used to calculate a "user pain" score as follows:
|
|||
`pain = severity × frequency`
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Assigning Issues to Milestones
|
||||
|
||||
Any issue that is being worked on must have:
|
||||
|
||||
* An `Assignee`: The person doing the work.
|
||||
* A `Milestone`: When we expect to complete this work.
|
||||
|
||||
We aim to only have at most three milestones open at a time:
|
||||
|
||||
* Closing Milestone: A milestone with a very small number of issues, about to release.
|
||||
* Current Milestone: Work that we plan to complete within one week.
|
||||
* Next Milestone: Work that is > 1 week but current for the team.
|
||||
|
||||
The [backlog](https://github.com/angular/angular/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+no%3Amilestone)
|
||||
consists of all issues that have been triaged but do not have an assignee or milestone.
|
||||
|
||||
## Triaged vs Untrained PRs
|
||||
|
||||
PRs should also be label with a `comp: *` so that it is clear which
|
||||
PRs should also be label with a `comp: *` so that it is clear which
|
||||
primary area the PR effects.
|
||||
|
||||
Because of the cumulative pain associated with rebasing PRs, we triage PRs daily, and
|
||||
closing or reviewing PRs is a top priority ahead of other ongoing work.
|
||||
Because of the cumulative pain associated with rebasing PRs, we triage PRs daily, and
|
||||
closing or reviewing PRs is a top priority ahead of other ongoing work.
|
||||
|
||||
Every triaged PR must have a `pr_action` label assigned to it and an assignee:
|
||||
|
||||
* `pr_action: review` -- work is complete and comment is needed from the assignee.
|
||||
* `pr_action: cleanup` -- more work is needed from the current assignee.
|
||||
* `pr_action: discuss` -- discussion is needed, to be led by the current assignee.
|
||||
* `pr_action: merge` -- the PR should be merged. Add this to a PR when you would like to
|
||||
|
||||
* `pr_action: review` - work is complete and comment is needed from the assignee.
|
||||
* `pr_action: cleanup` - more work is needed from the current assignee.
|
||||
* `pr_action: discuss` - discussion is needed, to be led by the current assignee.
|
||||
* `pr_action: merge` - the PR should be merged. Add this to a PR when you would like to
|
||||
trigger automatic merging following a successful build. This is described in [COMMITTER.md](COMMITTER.md).
|
||||
|
||||
In addition, PRs can have the following states:
|
||||
|
||||
* `pr_state: LGTM` -- PR may have outstanding changes but does not require further review.
|
||||
* `pr_state: WIP` -- PR is experimental or rapidly changing. Not ready for review or triage.
|
||||
* `pr_state: blocked` -- PR is blocked on an issue or other PR. Not ready for review or triage.
|
||||
* `pr_state: WIP` - PR is experimental or rapidly changing. Not ready for review or triage.
|
||||
* `pr_state: blocked` - PR is blocked on an issue or other PR. Not ready for review or triage.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that an LGTM state does not mean a PR is ready to merge: for example, a reviewer might set the
|
||||
LGTM state but request a minor tweak that doesn't need further review, e.g., a rebase or small
|
||||
|
||||
## PR Approvals
|
||||
|
||||
Before a PR can be merged it must be approved by the appropriate reviewer(s).
|
||||
|
||||
To ensure that there right people review each change, we configured [PullApprove bot](https://about.pullapprove.com/) via (`.pullapprove.yaml`) to provide aggregate approval state via the GitHub PR Status API.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that approved state does not mean a PR is ready to be merged. For example, a reviewer might
|
||||
approve the PR but request a minor tweak that doesn't need further review, e.g., a rebase or small
|
||||
uncontroversial change.
|
||||
|
||||
PRs do not need to be assigned to milestones, unless a milestone release should be held for that
|
||||
PR to land.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Special Labels
|
||||
|
||||
### action:design
|
||||
More active discussion is needed before the issue can be worked on further. Typically used for
|
||||
More active discussion is needed before the issue can be worked on further. Typically used for
|
||||
`type: feature` or `type: RFC/discussion/question`
|
||||
|
||||
[See all issues that need discussion](https://github.com/angular/angular/labels/action:%20Design)
|
||||
|
||||
### cla
|
||||
Managed by googlebot. Indicates whether a PR has a CLA on file for its author(s). Only issues with
|
||||
### cla: yes, cla: no
|
||||
Managed by googlebot. Indicates whether a PR has a CLA on file for its author(s). Only issues with
|
||||
`cla:yes` should be merged into master.
|
||||
|
||||
### WORKS_AS_INTENDED
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue