parent
64fd0d6db9
commit
c88305d2eb
|
@ -845,6 +845,8 @@ testing/** @angular/fw-test
|
||||||
/aio/content/guide/migration-renderer.md @angular/fw-docs-packaging @angular/framework-global-approvers @angular/framework-global-approvers-for-docs-only-changes
|
/aio/content/guide/migration-renderer.md @angular/fw-docs-packaging @angular/framework-global-approvers @angular/framework-global-approvers-for-docs-only-changes
|
||||||
/aio/content/guide/migration-undecorated-classes.md @angular/fw-docs-packaging @angular/framework-global-approvers @angular/framework-global-approvers-for-docs-only-changes
|
/aio/content/guide/migration-undecorated-classes.md @angular/fw-docs-packaging @angular/framework-global-approvers @angular/framework-global-approvers-for-docs-only-changes
|
||||||
/aio/content/guide/migration-dynamic-flag.md @angular/fw-docs-packaging @angular/framework-global-approvers @angular/framework-global-approvers-for-docs-only-changes
|
/aio/content/guide/migration-dynamic-flag.md @angular/fw-docs-packaging @angular/framework-global-approvers @angular/framework-global-approvers-for-docs-only-changes
|
||||||
|
/aio/content/guide/migration-injectable.md @angular/fw-docs-packaging @angular/framework-global-approvers @angular/framework-global-approvers-for-docs-only-changes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# ================================================
|
# ================================================
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -361,10 +361,16 @@ See the [dedicated migration guide for Renderer](guide/migration-renderer).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{@a undecorated-classes}
|
{@a undecorated-classes}
|
||||||
### Migrating undecorated classes
|
### Migrating undecorated classes
|
||||||
See the [dedicated migration guide for undecorated classes](guide/migration-undecorated-classes).
|
|
||||||
|
See the [dedicated migration guide for undecorated classes](guide/migration-undecorated-classes).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{@a injectable}
|
||||||
|
### Adding missing `@Injectable()` decorators
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
See the [dedicated migration guide for adding missing `@Injectable` decorators](guide/migration-injectable).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{@a flag-migration}
|
{@a flag-migration}
|
||||||
### Dynamic queries flag migration
|
### Migrating dynamic queries
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See the [dedicated migration guide for dynamic queries](guide/migration-dynamic-flag).
|
See the [dedicated migration guide for dynamic queries](guide/migration-dynamic-flag).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
||||||
|
# Migration to Add Missing `@Injectable()` Decorators
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What does this schematic do?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This schematic adds an `@Injectable()` decorator to a class
|
||||||
|
if the class has been added as a provider anywhere in the application.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An example diff might look like the following:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Before:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```ts
|
||||||
|
export class TypeCase {...}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**After:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```ts
|
||||||
|
@Injectable()
|
||||||
|
export class TypeCase {...}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
There are a few cases where the decorator won't be added. For example:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- It already has another decorator such as `@Component()`, `@Directive()` or `@Pipe()`. These decorators already cause the compiler to generate the necessary information.
|
||||||
|
- The provider definition has `useValue`, `useFactory`, or `useExisting`. In
|
||||||
|
these cases, the framework doesn't need the `@Injectable()` decorator to create the class because
|
||||||
|
because it can just use the value,
|
||||||
|
factory function, or existing instance that was provided.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For example, for the following module definition, the schematic will check
|
||||||
|
`TypeCase`, `ProvideCase`, `ExistingClass`, and `SomeClass` to ensure they
|
||||||
|
are marked with the `@Injectable()` decorator and add one if not.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```ts
|
||||||
|
@NgModule({
|
||||||
|
providers: [
|
||||||
|
// TypeCase needs @Injectable()
|
||||||
|
TypeCase,
|
||||||
|
// ProvideCase needs @Injectable()
|
||||||
|
{provide: ProvideCase},
|
||||||
|
// No @Injectable() needed because the value will be used
|
||||||
|
{provide: ValueCase, useValue: 0},
|
||||||
|
// No @Injectable() needed because factory will be used
|
||||||
|
{provide: FactoryCase, useFactory: ()=> null},
|
||||||
|
// ExistingClass needs @Injectable()
|
||||||
|
{provide: ExistingToken, useExisting: ExistingClass},
|
||||||
|
// SomeClass needs @Injectable()
|
||||||
|
{provide: ClassToken, useClass: SomeClass},
|
||||||
|
// No @Injectable() needed because it has a @Pipe() decorator
|
||||||
|
PipeCase,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Why is this migration necessary?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In our docs, we've always recommended adding `@Injectable()`
|
||||||
|
decorators to any class that is provided or injected in your application.
|
||||||
|
However, older versions of Angular did allow injection of a class
|
||||||
|
without the decorator in certain cases, such as AOT mode.
|
||||||
|
This means if you accidentally omitted the decorator, your application
|
||||||
|
may have continued to work despite missing `@Injectable()` decorators in some places.
|
||||||
|
This is problematic for future versions of Angular. Eventually, we plan
|
||||||
|
to strictly require the decorator because doing so enables further
|
||||||
|
optimization of both the compiler and the runtime. This schematic
|
||||||
|
adds any `@Injectable()` decorators that may be missing to future-proof your app.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## When should I be adding `@Injectable()` decorators to classes?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Any class that is provided or injected somewhere must have an `@Injectable()` decorator. The decorator is necessary for the framework to properly create an instance of that class through DI.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
However, as noted above, classes that already have another class decorator like `@Pipe` do not need both decorators. The existing class decorator will cause the compiler to generate the proper information.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Should I update my library?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, if your library has any tokens that are meant to be injected, they should be updated with the `@Injectable()` decorator. In a future version of Angular, a missing `@Injectable()` decorator will always throw an error.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue