docs: reword a few phrases in the GITHUB_PROCESS.md doc (#41977)
Reword a few things in the explanation around our `Feature request process` to make the process a little clearer. PR Close #41977
This commit is contained in:
parent
1be5d659a5
commit
e29eb8abfb
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||||
<a name="conversation-locking"></a>
|
<a name="conversation-locking"></a>
|
||||||
# Automatic conversation locking
|
# Automatic conversation locking
|
||||||
Closed issues and pull requests are locked automatically after 30 days of inactivity.
|
Closed issues and pull requests are locked automatically after 30 days of inactivity.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## I want to comment on a locked conversation, what should I do?
|
## I want to comment on a locked conversation, what should I do?
|
||||||
When an issue has been closed and inactive for over 30 days, the original context is likely outdated.
|
When an issue has been closed and inactive for over 30 days, the original context is likely outdated.
|
||||||
|
@ -17,26 +17,27 @@ providing any of the additional information the team needs to investigate.
|
||||||
# Feature request process
|
# Feature request process
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To manage the requests we receive at scale, we introduced automation in our feature request
|
To manage the requests we receive at scale, we introduced automation in our feature request
|
||||||
management process. After we triage a ticket and we identify it as a feature request, it goes
|
management process. After we triage an issue and we identify it as a feature request, it goes
|
||||||
through several steps.
|
through several steps.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Manual review
|
## Manual review
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
First, we manually review to verify if it aligns with any of the existing roadmap efforts. If it
|
First, we manually review the issue to see if it aligns with any of the existing roadmap efforts. If
|
||||||
does, we prioritize it. Alternatively, we keep it open and our feature request bot initiates a
|
it does, we prioritize it accordingly. Alternatively, we keep it open and our feature request bot
|
||||||
voting process.
|
initiates a voting process.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Voting phase
|
## Voting phase
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To include the community in the feature request process, we open voting for 60 days. Anyone can cast
|
To include the community in the feature request process, we open voting for 60 days. Anyone can cast
|
||||||
a vote for the request with a thump-up (👍) reaction. If the feature request reaches 20 or more
|
a vote for the request with a thumbs-up (👍) reaction. When a feature request reaches 20 or more
|
||||||
upvotes, we review it again manually. Alternatively, the bot closes the request.
|
upvotes, we formally consider the feature request. Alternatively, the bot closes the request.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Consideration phase
|
## Consideration phase
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the feature request receives 20 or more votes, we verify if we can afford to maintain it and
|
If the feature request receives 20 or more votes, we verify the Angular team can afford to maintain
|
||||||
whether it aligns with the long-term vision of Angular. If the answers of both questions are yes,
|
the feature and whether it aligns with the long-term vision of Angular. If the answers to both of
|
||||||
we prioritize the request, alternatively we close it.
|
these questions are yes, we prioritize the request, alternatively we close it with an explanation of
|
||||||
|
our decision.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Diagram
|
## Diagram
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue