Fixes Ivy matching directives against attribute bindings (e.g. `[attr.some-directive]="foo"`). Works by excluding attribute bindings from the attributes array during compilation. This has the added benefit of generating less code.
**Note:** My initial approach to implementing this was to have a different marker for attribute bindings so that they can be ignored when matching directives, however as I was implementing it I realized that the attributes in that array were only used for directive matching (as far as I could tell). I decided to drop the attribute bindings completely, because it results in less generated code.
PR Close#31541
Currently we reuse the same instruction both for regular property bindings and property bindings on the `host`. The only difference between the two is that when it's on the host we shouldn't support inputs. We have an optional parameter called `nativeOnly` which is used to differentiate the two, however since `nativeOnly` is preceeded by another optional parameter (`sanitizer`), we have to generate two extra parameters for each host property bindings every time (e.g. `property('someProp', 'someValue', null, true)`).
These changes add a new instruction called `hostProperty` which avoids the need for the two parameters by removing `nativeOnly` which is always set and it allows us to omit `sanitizer` when it isn't being used.
These changes also remove the `nativeOnly` parameter from the `updateSyntheticHostBinding` instruction, because it's only generated for host elements which means that we can assume that its value will always be `true`.
PR Close#31550
Adds chaining to the `property`, `attribute` and `updateSyntheticHostBinding` instructions when they're used in a host binding.
This PR resolves FW-1404.
PR Close#31296
Currently each property binding generates an instruction like this:
```
property('prop1', ctx.value1);
property('prop2', ctx.value2);
```
The problem is that we're repeating the call to `property` for each of the properties. Since the `property` instruction returns itself, we can chain all of the calls which is more compact and it looks like this:
```
property('prop1', ctx.value1)('prop2', ctx.value2);
```
These changes implement the chaining behavior for regular property bindings and for synthetic ones, however interpolated ones are still handled like before, because they use a separate instruction.
This PR resolves FW-1389.
PR Close#31078
- Refactors compiler to stop generating `ɵɵselect(0)` instructions
- Alters template execution to always call the equivalent of `ɵɵselect(0)` before running a template in update mode
- Updates tests to not check for or call `ɵɵselect(0)`.
The goal here is to reduce the size of generated templates
PR Close#30830
- Removes ɵɵelementProperty instruction
- Updates tests that were using it
- NOTE: There is one test under `render3/integration_spec.ts` that is commented out, and needs to be reviewed. Basically, I could not find a good why to test what it was doing, because it was doing things that I am not sure we could generate in an acceptance test.
PR Close#30645
There is an encoding issue with using delta `Δ`, where the browser will attempt to detect the file encoding if the character set is not explicitly declared on a `<script/>` tag, and Chrome will find the `Δ` character and decide it is window-1252 encoding, which misinterprets the `Δ` character to be some other character that is not a valid JS identifier character
So back to the frog eyes we go.
```
__
/ɵɵ\
( -- ) - I am ineffable. I am forever.
_/ \_
/ \ / \
== == ==
```
PR Close#30546
- Extracts and documents code that will be common to interpolation instructions
- Ensures that binding indices are updated at the proper time during compilation
- Adds additional tests
Related #30011
PR Close#30129
The `Δ` caused issue with other infrastructure, and we are temporarily
changing it to `ɵɵ`.
This commit also patches ts_api_guardian_test and AIO to understand `ɵɵ`.
PR Close#29850
This patch is the first of a few patches which separates the
styling logic between template bindings (e.g. <div [style])
from host bindings (e.g. @HostBinding('style')). This patch
in particular introduces a series of host-specific styling
instructions and changes the existing set of template styling
instructions not to accept directives. The underyling code (which
communicates with the styling algorithm) still works as it did
before.
This PR also separates the styling instruction code into a separate
file and moves over all other instructions into an dedicated
instructions directory.
PR Close#29292
Up until this point, all static attribute values (things like `title` and `id`)
defined within the `host` are of a Component/Directive definition were
generated into a `def.attributes` array and then processed at runtime.
This design decision does not lend itself well to tree-shaking and is
inconsistent with other static values such as styles and classes.
This fix ensures that all static attribute values (attributes, classes,
and styles) that exist within a host definition for components and
directives are all assigned via the `elementHostAttrs` instruction.
```
// before
defineDirective({
...
attributes: ['title', 'my title']
...
})
//now
defineDirective({
...
hostBindings: function() {
if (create) {
elementHostAttrs(..., ['title', 'my-title']);
}
...
}
...
})
```
PR Close#28089
This update aligns Ivy behavior with ViewEngine related to empty bindings (for example <div [someProp]></div>): empty bindings are ignored.
PR Close#28059
Previously in Ivy, host bindings did not work if they shared a public name
with an Input because they used the `elementProperty` instruction as is.
This instruction was originally built for inside component templates, so it
would either set a directive input OR a native property. This is the
correct behavior for inside a template, but for host bindings, we always
want the native properties to be set regardless of the presence of an Input.
This change adds an extra argument to `elementProperty` so we can tell it to
ignore directive inputs and only set native properties (if it is in the
context of a host binding).
PR Close#27589
Previously the compiler compliance tests ran and built test code with
real dependencies on @angular/core and @angular/common. This meant that
any changes to the compiler would result in long rebuild processes
for tests to rerun.
This change removes those dependencies and causes test code to be built
against the fake_core stub of @angular/core that the ngtsc tests use.
This change also removes the dependency on @angular/common entirely, as
locality means it's possible to reference *ngIf without needing to link
to an implementation.
PR Close#25248
This commit moves the compiler compliance tests into compiler-cli,
and uses ngtsc to run them instead of the custom compilation
pipeline used before. Testing against ngtsc allows for validation
of the real compiler output.
This commit also fixes a few small issues that prevented the tests
from passing.
PR Close#24862
crisbeto
Ben Lesh
Alex Rickabaugh
Matias Niemelä
Pete Bacon Darwin
Marc Laval
Andrew Kushnir
Kara Erickson
Olivier Combe
Misko Hevery
Pawel Kozlowski