In #38227 the signatures of `navigateByUrl` and `createUrlTree` were updated to exclude unsupported
properties from their `extras` parameter. This migration looks for the relevant method calls that
pass in an `extras` parameter and drops the unsupported properties.
**Before:**
```
this._router.navigateByUrl('/', {skipLocationChange: false, fragment: 'foo'});
```
**After:**
```
this._router.navigateByUrl('/', {
/* Removed unsupported properties by Angular migration: fragment. */
skipLocationChange: false
});
```
These changes also move the method call detection logic out of the `Renderer2` migration and into
a common place so that it can be reused in other migrations.
PR Close#38825
As of v10, the `undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields` migration
generally deals with undecorated classes using Angular features. We
intended to run this migation as part of v10 again as undecorated
classes with Angular features are no longer supported in planned v11.
The migration currently behaves incorrectly in some cases where an
`@Injectable` or `@Pipe` decorated classes uses the `ngOnDestroy`
lifecycle hook. We incorrectly add a TODO for those classes. This
commit fixes that.
Additionally, this change makes the migration more robust to
not migrate a class if it inherits from a component, pipe
injectable or non-abstract directive. We previously did not
need this as the undecorated-classes-with-di migration ran
before, but this is no longer the case.
Last, this commit fixes an issue where multiple TODO's could be
added. This happens when multiple Angular CLI build targets have
an overlap in source files. Multiple programs then capture the
same source file, causing the migration to detect an undecorated
class multiple times (i.e. adding a TODO twice).
Fixes#37726.
PR Close#37732
Enables the `ng update` migrations for v10. Status for individual
migrations:
**undecorated-classes-with-di**.
This migration dealt exlusively with inherited constructors and
cases where a derived component was undecorated. In those cases,
the migration added `@Directive()` or copied the inherited decorator
to the derived class.
We don't need to run this migration again because ngtsc throws if
constructor is inherited from an undecorated class. Also ngtsc will
throw if a NgModule references an undecorated class in the declarations.
***undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields***
This migration exclusively deals with undecorated classes that use
Angular features but are not decorated. Angular features include
the use of lifecycle hooks or class fields with Angular decorators,
such as `@Input()`.
We want to re-run this migration in v10 as we will disable the
compatibility code in ngtsc that detects such undecorated classes
as `@Directive`.
**module-with-providers**:
This migration adds an explicit generic type to `ModuleWithProviders`.
As of v10, the generic type is required, so we need to re-run the
migration again.
**renderer-to-renderer2**:
We don't need to re-run that migration again as the
renderer has been already removed in v9.
**missing-injectable**:
This migration is exclusively concerned with undecorated
providers referenced in an `NgModule`. We should re-run
that migration again as we don't have proper backsliding
prevention for this yet. We can consider adding an error
in ngtsc for v10, or v11. In either way, we should re-run
the migration.
**dynamic-queries**:
We ran this one in v9 to reduce code complexity in projects. Instead
of explicitly passing `static: false`, not passing any object literal
has the same semantics. We don't need to re-run the migration again
since there is no good way to prevent backsliding and we cannot always
run this migration for future versions (as some apps might actually
intentionally use the explicit `static: false` option).
PR Close#36921
As of v10, undecorated classes using Angular features are no longer
supported. In v10, we plan on removing the undecorated classes
compatibility code in ngtsc. This means that old patterns for
undecorated classes will result in compilation errors.
We had a migration for this in v9 already, but it looks like
the migration does not handle cases where classes uses lifecycle
hooks. This is handled in the ngtsc compatibility code, and we
should handle it similarly in migrations too.
This has not been outlined in the migration plan initially,
but an appendix has been added for v10 to the plan document.
https://hackmd.io/vuQfavzfRG6KUCtU7oK_EA?both.
Note: The migration is unable to determine whether a given undecorated
class that only defines `ngOnDestroy` is a directive or an actual
service. This means that in some cases the migration cannot do
more than adding a TODO and printing an failure.
Certainly there are more ways to determine the type of such classes,
but it would involve metadata and NgModule analysis. This is out of
scope for this migration.
PR Close#36921
Based on the migration guide, provided classes which don't have
either `@Injectable`, `@Directive`, `@Component` or `@Pipe` need
to be migrated.
This is not correct as provided classes with an `@NgModule` also
have a factory function that can be read by the r3 injector. It's
unclear in which cases the `@NgModule` decorator is used for
provided classes, but this scenario has been reported.
Either we fix this in the migration, or we make sure to report
this as unsupported in the Ivy compiler.
Fixes#35700.
PR Close#36369
The undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields migration relies on
the type checker to resolve base classes of individual classes.
It could happen that resolved base classes have no value declaration.
e.g. if they are declared through an interface in the default types.
Currently the migration will throw in such situations because it assumes
that `ts.Symbol#valueDeclaration` is always present. This is not the
case, but we don't get good type-checking here due to a bug in the
TypeScript types. See:
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/24706.
Fixes#36522.
PR Close#36543
In rare cases a project with configured `rootDirs` that has imports to
non-existent identifiers could fail in the migration.
This happens because based on the application code, the migration could
end up trying to resolve the `ts.Symbol` of such non-existent
identifiers. This isn't a problem usually, but due to a upstream bug
in the TypeScript compiler, a runtime error is thrown.
This is because TypeScript is unable to compute a relative path from the
originating source file to the imported source file which _should_
provide the non-existent identifier. An issue for this has been reported
upstream: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/37731. The
issue only surfaces since our migrations don't provide an absolute base
path that is used for resolving the root directories.
To fix this, we ensure that we never use relative paths when parsing
tsconfig files. More details can be found in the TS issue.
Fixes#36346.
PR Close#36367
In version 10, undecorated base classes that use Angular features need
to be decorated explicitly with `@Directive()`. Additionally, derived
classes of abstract directives need to be decorated.
The migration already handles this for undecorated classes that are
not explicitly decorated, but since in V9, abstract directives can be
used, we also need to handle this for explicitly decorated abstract
directives. e.g.
```
@Directive()
export class Base {...}
// needs to be decorated by migration when updating from v9 to v10
export class Wrapped extends Base {}
@Component(...)
export class Cmp extends Wrapped {}
```
PR Close#35339
We don't have an integration test for the `undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields
migration. For consistency and to cover for the latest changes, we add
it to the `ng update` integration test.
PR Close#35339
The `undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields` migration has been
introduced with 904a2018e0, but misses
logic for decorating derived classes of undecorated classes which use
Angular features. Example scenario:
```ts
export abstract class MyBaseClass {
@Input() someInput = true;
}
export abstract class BaseClassTwo extends MyBaseClass {}
@Component(...)
export class MyButton extends BaseClassTwo {}
```
Both abstract classes would need to be migrated. Previously, the migration
only added `@Directive()` to `MyBaseClass`, but with this change, it
also decorates `BaseClassTwo`.
This is necessary because the Angular Compiler requires `BaseClassTwo` to
have a directive definition when it flattens the directive metadata for
`MyButton` in order to perform type checking. Technically, not decorating
`BaseClassTwo` does not break at runtime.
We basically want to enforce consistent use of `@Directive` to simplify the
mental model. [See the migration guide](https://angular.io/guide/migration-undecorated-classes#migrating-classes-that-use-field-decorators).
Fixes#34376.
PR Close#35339
The import manager has been created for both the `missing-injectable`
and `undecorated-classes-with-di` migration. Both initial PRs brought
in the manager class, so the manager is duplicated in the schematics.
In order to reduce this duplication, and to expose the manager to other
schematics/migrations, we move it into the shared schematic utils.
PR Close#35339
Moves the `findBaseClassDeclarations` method into the shared
schematic utilities. This method will be useful for future
migrations, and for planned changes to the
`undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields` migration.
PR Close#35339
This commit adds support in the Angular monorepo and in the Angular
compiler(s) for TypeScript 3.8. All packages can now compile with
TS 3.8.
For most of the repo, only a handful few typings adjustments were needed:
* TS 3.8 has a new `CustomElementConstructor` DOM type, which enforces a
zero-argument constructor. The `NgElementConstructor` type previously
declared a required `injector` argument despite the fact that its
implementation allowed `injector` to be optional. The interface type was
updated to reflect the optionality of the argument.
* Certain error messages were changed, and expectations in tests were
updated as a result.
* tsserver (part of language server) now returns performance information in
responses, so test expectations were changed to only assert on the actual
body content of responses.
For compiler-cli and schematics (which use the TypeScript AST) a major
breaking change was the introduction of the export form:
```typescript
export * as foo from 'bar';
```
This is a `ts.NamespaceExport`, and the `exportClause` of a
`ts.ExportDeclaration` can now take this type as well as `ts.NamedExports`.
This broke a lot of places where `exportClause` was assumed to be
`ts.NamedExports`.
For the most part these breakages were in cases where it is not necessary
to handle the new `ts.NamedExports` anyway. ngtsc's design uses the
`ts.TypeChecker` APIs to understand syntax and so automatically supports the
new form of exports.
The View Engine compiler on the other hand extracts TS structures into
metadata.json files, and that format was not designed for namespaced
exports. As a result it will take a nontrivial amount of work if we want to
support such exports in View Engine. For now, these new exports are not
accounted for in metadata.json, and so using them in "folded" Angular
expressions will result in errors (probably claiming that the referenced
exported namespace doesn't exist).
Care was taken to only use TS APIs which are present in 3.7/3.6, as Angular
needs to remain compatible with these for the time being.
This commit does not update angular.io.
PR Close#35864
The options for `flatModuleId` and `flatModuleOutFile` had been removed in the CLI
from generated libraries with 718ee15b9a.
This has been done because `ng-packagr` (which is used to build the
libraries) automatically set these options in-memory when it compiles the library.
No migration has been created for this because there was no actual need to get rid of
this. Keeping the options in the library `tsconfig` does not cause any problems unless
the `tsconfig` is used outside of `ng-packagr`. This was not anticipated, but is now
commonly done in `ng update` migrations.
The `ng update` migrations try to create an instance of the `AngularCompilerProgram` by
simply parsing the `tsconfig`. The migrations make the valid assumption that `tsconfig` files
are not incomplete/invalid. They _definitely_ are in the file system though. It just works for
libraries because `ng-packagr` in-memory completes the invalid `tsconfig` files, so that they
can be passed to the `@angular/compiler-cli`.
We can't have this logic in the `ng update` migrations because it's
out-of-scope for individual migrations to distinguish between libraries
and applications. Also it would be out-of-scope to parse the
`ng-packagr` configuration and handle the tsconfig in-memory completion.
As a workaround though, we can remove the flat-module bundle options
in-memory when creating the compiler program. This is acceptable since
we don't emit the program and the flat module bundles are not needed.
Fixes#34985.
PR Close#35824
Previously the calls to run the schematics were not being properly
or consistently awaited in the tests. While this currently does not
affect the tests' performance, this fix corrects the syntax and
adds stability for future changes.
PR Close#34364
Previously, the compiler performed an incremental build by analyzing and
resolving all classes in the program (even unchanged ones) and then using
the dependency graph information to determine which .js files were stale and
needed to be re-emitted. This algorithm produced "correct" rebuilds, but the
cost of re-analyzing the entire program turned out to be higher than
anticipated, especially for component-heavy compilations.
To achieve performant rebuilds, it is necessary to reuse previous analysis
results if possible. Doing this safely requires knowing when prior work is
viable and when it is stale and needs to be re-done.
The new algorithm implemented by this commit is such:
1) Each incremental build starts with knowledge of the last known good
dependency graph and analysis results from the last successful build,
plus of course information about the set of files changed.
2) The previous dependency graph's information is used to determine the
set of source files which have "logically" changed. A source file is
considered logically changed if it or any of its dependencies have
physically changed (on disk) since the last successful compilation. Any
logically unchanged dependencies have their dependency information copied
over to the new dependency graph.
3) During the `TraitCompiler`'s loop to consider all source files in the
program, if a source file is logically unchanged then its previous
analyses are "adopted" (and their 'register' steps are run). If the file
is logically changed, then it is re-analyzed as usual.
4) Then, incremental build proceeds as before, with the new dependency graph
being used to determine the set of files which require re-emitting.
This analysis reuse avoids template parsing operations in many circumstances
and significantly reduces the time it takes ngtsc to rebuild a large
application.
Future work will increase performance even more, by tackling a variety of
other opportunities to reuse or avoid work.
PR Close#34288
With Angular CLI version 9 RC 3 we can run a single migration for a package using the name of the migration schematic.
We need to pass the schematic name as a value to the `migrate-only` option.
Ex:
```
ng update @angular/core --migrate-only migration-v9-undecorated-classes-with-di
```
See: https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/pull/16174
PR Close#33958
In View Engine, providers which neither used `useValue`, `useClass`,
`useFactory` or `useExisting`, were interpreted differently.
e.g.
```
{provide: X} -> {provide: X, useValue: undefined}, // this is how it works in View Engine
{provide: X} -> {provide: X, useClass: X}, // this is how it works in Ivy
```
The missing-injectable migration should migrate such providers to the
explicit `useValue` provider. This ensures that there is no unexpected
behavioral change when updating to v9.
PR Close#33709
The `renderer-to-renderer2` migration currently does not work
properly in v9 because the migration relies on the type checker
for detecting references to `Renderer` from `@angular/core`.
This is contradictory since the `Renderer` is no longer
exported in v9 `@angular/core`. In order to make sure that
the migration still works in v9, and that we can rely on the
type checker for the best possible detection, we take advantage
of module augmentation and in-memory add the `Renderer` export
to the `@angular/core` module.
PR Close#33571
Currently TypeScript projects with an invalid tsconfig configuration,
cause the undecorated-classes-with-di migration to throw. Instead we
should gracefully exit the migration (like we do for syntactical
diagnostics), but report that there are configuration issues.
This issue surfaced when testing this migration in combination
with the Angular CLI migrations. One of the CLI migrations currently
causes invalid tsconfig files which then cause this issue in the
undecorated-classes-with-di migration.
PR Close#33567
Currently if one of the project targets could not be analyzed
due to AOT compiler program failures, we gracefully proceed
with the migration. This is expected, but we should not
print a message at the end of the migration that the migration
was _successful_. The migration was only done partially, hence
it's potentially incomplete and we should make it clear that once
the failures are resolved, the migration should be re-run.
PR Close#33315
With the next version of the CLI we don't need to add logging for the description of the schematic as part of the schematic itself.
This is because now, the CLI will print the description defined in the `migrations.json` file.
See: https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/pull/15951
PR Close#33440
Currently the `missing-injectable` migration seems to add
`@Injectable()` to third-party classes in type definitions.
This not an issue in general since we do not generate broken code
by inserting a decorator into a type definition file. Though, we can
avoid adding the decorator since it won't have any effect and in
general we should not write to non source files of the compilation unit.
PR Close#33286
We should not migrate the reference from `useExisting`. This is because
developers can only use the `useExisting` value as a token. e.g.
```ts
@NgModule({
providers: [
{provide: AppRippleConfig, useValue: rippleOptions},
{provide: MAT_RIPPLE_OPTIONS, useExisting: AppRippleConfig},
]
})
export class AppModule {}
```
In the case above, nothing should be decorated with `@Injectable`. The
`AppRippleConfig` class is just used as a token for injection.
PR Close#33286
Currently the migration is unable to migrate instances where
the provider definition uses `forwardRef`. Since this is a
common pattern, we should support that from within the migration.
The solution to the problem is adding a foreign function resolver
to the `PartialEvaluator`. This basically matches the usage of
the static evaluation that is used by the ngtsc annotations.
PR Close#33286
Static methods that return a type of ModuleWithProviders currently
do not have to specify a type because the generic falls back to any.
This is problematic because the type of the actual module being
returned is not present in the type information.
Since Ivy uses d.ts files exclusively for downstream packages
(rather than metadata.json files, for example), we no longer have
the type of the actual module being created.
For this reason, a generic type should be added for
ModuleWithProviders that specifies the module type. This will be
required for all users in v10, but will only be necessary for
users of Ivy in v9.
PR Close#33217
Angular v9 schematics should print out a link to the migration
guide associated with each schematic. This way, users have an
easy way to find more information about the automatic code
transformations they will see with `ng update`.
PR Close#33258
Currenly the `missing-injectable` migration only migrates providers referenced from
`@NgModule` definitions. The schematic currently does not cover the migration for
providers referenced in `@Directive` or `@Component` definitions.
We need to handle the following keys for directives/components:
- `@Directive` -> `providers`
- `@Component` -> `providers` and `viewProviders`.
This commit ensures that the migration handles providers for these
definitions.
PR Close#33011
Re-enables the dynamic queries migration, now that we have all of the necessary framework changes in place.
Also moves the logic that identifies static queries out of the compiler and into the static queries migration, because that's the only place left that's using it.
PR Close#32992
Current we need to create and override certain compiler host methods in every schematic because schematics use a virtual fs. We this change we extract this logic to a common util.
PR Close#32827
The creation of StaticReflector in createMetadataResolver() is a very expensive operation because it involves numerous module resolutions.
To make matter worse, since the API of the Reflector does not provide the ability to invalidate its internal caches, it has to be destroyed and recreated on *every* program change.
This has a HUGE impact on performance.
This PR fixes this problem by carefully invalidating all StaticSymbols in a file that has changed, thereby reducing the overhead of recomputation on program change.
PR Close#32543
Currently the undecorated-classes-with-di migration leverages NGC in order
to work with metadata resolution. Since NGC by default tries to resolve referenced
resources on initialization of the underlying TS program, it can result in unexpected
migration failures due to missing resource files.
This is especially an issue since the CLI wraps the `AngularCompilerProgram` with
special logic (i.e. to support SCSS preprocessing etc.). We don't have all of this since
we instantiate a vanilla NGC program.
The solution to the problem is to simply treat resource requests as valid, and returning
a fake content. The migration is not dependent on templates or stylesheets.. so it's the
simplest and most robust solution.
Fixes#32826
PR Close#32953
ec4381d explicitly set `enableIvy: false` for all migrations inside
the core package. This actually hides migration issues because the
migration itself should ensure that it instantiates the right
compiler program if it relies on `@angular/compiler-cli`.
We should remove these options from all migration tests to
ensure that we catch issues with migrations running in version
9 where Ivy is enabled by default.
e.g. e5636a322c
was accidentally hidden due to the `enableIvy: false` option.
PR Close#32954
ec4381d enabled Ivy by default. This is problematic as migrations
like `static-queries` depend on the `AngularCompilerProgram` (NGC)
in order to perform the migration from version 7 to version 8.
In order to ensure that the migration always runs with NGC
(and doesn't get the `NgtscProgram`), we need to explicitly disable
ivy when creating the `@angular/compiler-cli` program for the migration.
This code is still relevant even though the update from version 7
to version 8 landed. Developers can run `ng update` from version 7
and immediately get to version 9 where Ivy is enabled by default (and in
that case we need to ensure that ngtsc is not accidentally used).
Similar to
e5636a322c.
PR Close#32954
Kristiyan Kostadinov
Alan Agius
Paul Gschwendtner
Joey Perrott
Alex Rickabaugh
Greg Magolan
atscott
Adam Plumer
Filipe Silva
Michael Prentice
Kara Erickson
Charles Lyding
Alan
Keen Yee Liau