Issue triage _currently_ requires a component to be set and one of the following to be true for an issue to be
considered triaged:
* Marked as a bug _and_ has a severity _and_ has a frequency
* Mark as a feature
* Marked as a refactor
* Marked as a discussion
* Marked as "confusing"
* Marked as "use-case"
This PR changes the rules so that (in addition to the component), triage
requires:
* A priority label (P0 through P5)
* Marked as a feature
* Marked as a discussion
Triage may also apply additional, optional info labels to issues.
[This document outlines the new priority
scheme](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mN2zWsr1pxChSTHC7UkOgl4PhhuoFONtG_zcMWeqLwA/preview).
While this PR is focused on issue triage and not PR triage, I have
changed the PR section triage to remove reference to the "effort: *" and
"risk: *" labels. Looking through recent PRs, Kapunahele is the only
person applying these, so it's clear that this bit is no longer widely
practiced.
This is just one step in the always-ongoing process of managing GitHub
labels. More adjustments will come over time. In writing this PR, I have
already unearthed a few more areas that can be polished in follow-ups.
PR Close#38932
This commit updates ngbot config to avoid requesting google3 presubmit for the changes in
the `packages/compiler-cli/src/ngtsc/sourcemaps` folder (which is not synced into google3).
PR Close#39035
This commit updates ngbot config to avoid requesting google3 presubmit for the changes in
the `packages/zone.js/dist` folder (which is not synced into google3).
PR Close#38901
Updates the Github robot to reflect the updated target
labels that are used as part of the canonical versioning
and labeling for the Angular organization.
PR Close#38428
Some issue reports don't really fall into any of the current buckets that count
towards triage level 2: bug/fix, feature, or refactor. Some reports are:
* working as intended but confusing - the labels might be 'type: confusing', 'comp: docs', 'comp: router'
* generally working as originally designed but a use-case could be argued for a different implementation.
This type of report is a little hard to triage; it may be neither a bug, nor feature but more of a
'type: use-case'. These may eventually turn into a bug/fix or feature, but can't necessarily be
put in those buckets immediately.
PR Close#38081
We are migrating to PullApprove for our PR review management in an attempt
to allow for more granular and equitable code review assignments across the
team. Currently this migration is equivalent in the review assignments
it will create. Once stable, our expectation is that we will be able to
take advantage of PullApproves additional features for things like staged
reviews.
PR Close#34814
We rename the `material-unit-tests` job to `components-repo-unit-tests`
because the job runs all unit tests found in the Angular Components repository.
This includes the Angular CDK, Angular Material and more. Also the repository has
been renamed from `angular/material2` to `angular/components` in the past.
PR Close#34898
Previously, the examples in the `comparing-observables` guide were hard-coded.
This made it impossible to test them and verify they are correct.
This commit fixes this by converting them into a proper mini-app. In a
subsequent commit, tests will be added to verify that the source code
works as expected (and guard against regressions).
Fixes#31024
PR Close#34327
Previously, the examples in the `cli-builder` guide were hard-coded.
This made it impossible to test them and verify they are correct.
This commit fixes this by converting them into a proper mini-app. In a
subsequent commit, tests will be added to verify that the source code
works as expected (and guard against regressions).
Fixes#34314
PR Close#34362
It will be easier to track regressions in size if fewer people
are approving size diffs in PRs. That way, we will have a few
people that have a fuller picture of where size changes are
coming from.
PR Close#33969
This commit adds a guide to AIO navigation for
"Migrating to Version 9" and moves the schematics
section into the guide that previously lived in
the deprecations page. It also pastes a snippet
of the deprecations page in the new guide so users
don't have to filter out deprecations they've seen
before.
Note: Ivy compatibility section is coming up in a
follow-up PR.
PR Close#33339
The `dev-infra-framework` codeowners section is located after
all the codeowner sections for the individual framework packages.
This means that for certain wildcards, like `*.bzl` take precedence
over the individual package sections (like of `/packages/bazel/**`).
This can be observed in the following PR where `dev-infra` got requested
for file changes to `@angular/bazel`. #32955.
To fix this, we move the `dev-infra-framework` section before all
individual framework package sections. This means that we only match
files which are not matched by other patterns.
Additionally a pattern for `*.BAZEL` has been added to the dev-infra
section. This helps getting changes to `BUILD.bazel` files through
easier as dev-infra can review those (Note: only for bazel files which
are not matched by other patterns).
PR Close#32956
This change aims to align the documented members in `CODEOWNERS` with
the actual members of the secret `framework-global-approvers` GitHub
team.
PR Close#32667
BREAKING CHANGE:
Angular bazel users using protractor_web_test_suite from @angular/bazel npm package should now switch to the @bazel/protractor npm package.
This should impact very few users and the user's that are impacted have a very easy upgrade path to switch to fetching the protractor_web_test_suite rule via the @bazel/protractor npm package.
PR Close#32485
Based on the output of `node aio\scripts\verify-docs-codeownership`, the
following guides still have no owners:
- accessibility.md
- angular-compiler-options.md
- aot-metadata-errors.md
- bazel.md
- cli-builder.md
- static-query-migration.md
PR Close#32360