This is a follow up to #35637 which resolved a similar issue for `ComponentFactoryResolver`, but not the root cause. When a `NgModuleRef` is created, it instantiates an `Injector` internally which in turn resolves all of injector types. This can result in a circular call that results in an error, because the module is one of the injector types being resolved.
These changes work around the issue by allowing the constructor to run before resolving the injector types.
Fixes#35677.
Fixes#35639.
PR Close#35731
Switches our tslint setup to the standard `tslint.json` linter excludes.
The set of files that need to be linted is specified through a Yarn script.
For IDEs, open files are linted with the closest tslint configuration, if the
tslint IDE extension is set up, and the source file is not excluded.
We cannot use the language service plugin for tslint as we have multiple nested
tsconfig files, and we don't want to add the plugin to each tsconfig. We
could reduce that bloat by just extending from a top-level tsconfig that
defines the language service plugin, but unfortunately the tslint plugin does
not allow the use of tslint configs which are not part of the tsconfig project.
This is problematic since the tslint configuration is at the project root, and we
don't want to copy tslint configurations next to each tsconfig file.
Additionally, linting of `d.ts` files has been re-enabled. This has been
disabled in the past and a TODO has been left. This commit fixes the
lint issues and re-enables linting.
PR Close#35800
`ɵɵgetInheritedFactory()` is called from generated code for a component which extends another class. This function is detected by Closure to have a side effect and is not able to tree shake the component as a result. Marking it with `noSideEffects()` tells Closure it can remove this function under the relevant tree shaking conditions.
PR Close#35769
`ɵɵNgOnChangesFeature()` would set `ngInherit`, which is a side effect and also not necessary. This was pulled out to module scope so the function itself can be pure. Since it only curries another function, the call is entirely unnecessary. Updated the compiler to only generate a reference to this function, rather than a call to it, and removed the extra curry indirection.
PR Close#35769
Before this change ngIvy implementation of queries would throw upon
encountering null / undefined query result collected from an embedded
view. It turns out that we might have a provider that explicitly provides
a null / undefined value in a place of a token queried for.
This commit removes a check from the ngIvy query implementation that was
asserting on a query result to be defined.
Fixes#35673
PR Close#35796
Before this change `[class]` and `[className]` were both converted into `ɵɵclassMap`. The implication of this is that at runtime we could not differentiate between the two and as a result we treated `@Input('class')` and `@Input('className)` as equivalent.
This change makes `[class]` and `[className]` distinct. The implication of this is that `[class]` becomes `ɵɵclassMap` instruction but `[className]` becomes `ɵɵproperty' instruction. This means that `[className]` will no longer participate in styling and will overwrite the DOM `class` value.
Fix#35577
PR Close#35668
Prior to this commit, i18n attributes defined on `<ng-template>` tags were not processed by the compiler. This commit adds the necessary logic to handle i18n attributes in the same way how these attrs are processed for regular elements.
PR Close#35681
This commit updates the host bindings micro benchmark to run tests with mutliple directives (where each directive contains host bindings). The number of directives is configurable as a constant in the micro benchmark file. This change is needed to have an ability to measure/compare perf in different scenarios.
PR Close#35736
This commit extends the range of tNode types that may have local refs to include `TNodeType.Container` to account for `<ng-template>`s. Original changes in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/33415 didn't include that type and as a result, an error is thrown at runtime in case an i18n block contains an `<ng-template>` with local refs.
PR Close#35758
Prior to this change, the logic that compiles Injectable in JIT mode used incorrect configuration that triggers a problem when `ChangeDetectorRef` is used as a dependency. This commit updates the logic to generate correct inject instruction to add the `ChangeDetectorRef` dependency in case it's requested in @Injectable class.
PR Close#35706
This commit adds micro benchmark for host bindings, so that we can assess the impact of changes related to host bindings (for example PR #35568).
PR Close#35705
If an injectable has a `useClass`, Ivy injects the token in `useClass`, rather than the original injectable, if the injectable is re-provided under a different token. The correct behavior is that it should inject the re-provided token, no matter whether it has `useClass`.
Fixes#34110.
PR Close#34574
When binding to `[style]` we correctly sanitized/unwrapped properties but we did not do it for the object itself.
```
@HostBinding("style")
style: SafeStyle = this.sanitizer.bypassSecurityTrustStyle(
"background: red; color: white; display: block;"
);
```
Above code would fail since the `[style]` would not unwrap the `SafeValue` and would treat it as object resulting in incorrect behavior.
Fix#35476 (FW-1875)
PR Close#35564
Currently we resolve the `NgModuleRef.componentFactoryResolver` by going through the injector, but the problem is that `ComponentFactoryResolver` has a dependency on `NgModuleRef`, which means that if the module that's attached to the ref tries to inject `ComponentFactoryResolver` in its constructor, we'll create a circular dependency which throws at runtime.
These changes resolve the issue by creating the `ComponentFactoryResolver` manually ahead of time without going through the injector. We can do this safely, because the only dependency for the resolver is the current module ref which is providing it.
Aside from fixing the issue, another advantage to this approach is that it should reduce the amount of generated JS, because it removes a getter and a provider definitio.
Fixes#35580.
PR Close#35637
Currently if TestBed detects that TestBed.overrideModule was used for module X, transitive scopes are recalculated recursively for all modules that X imports and previously calculated data (stored in cache) is ignored. This behavior was introduced in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/33787 to fix stale transitive scopes issue (cache was not updated if module overrides are present).
The perf issue comes from a "diamond" problem, where module X is overridden which imports modules A and B, which both import module C. Under previous logic, module C gets its transitive deps recomputed multiple times, during the recompute for both A and B. For deep graphs and big common/shared modules this can be super costly.
This commit updates the logic to recalculate ransitive scopes for the overridden module, while keeping previously calculated scopes of other modules untouched.
PR Close#35454
When a pipe inherits its constructor, and as a result its factory, from an injectable in AOT mode, it can end up throwing an error, because the inject implementation hasn't been set yet. These changes ensure that the implementation is set before the pipe's factory is invoked.
Note that this isn't a problem in JIT mode, because the factory inheritance works slightly differently, hence why this test isn't going through `TestBed`.
Fixes#35277.
PR Close#35468
In #33705 we made it so that we generate pure functions for object/array literals in order to avoid having them be shared across elements/views. The problem this introduced is that further down the line the `ContantPool` uses the generated literal in order to figure out whether to share an existing factory or to create a new one. `ConstantPool` determines whether to share a factory by creating a key from the AST node and using it to look it up in the factory cache, however the key generation function didn't handle function invocations and replaced them with `null`. This means that the key for `{foo: pureFunction0(...)}` and `{foo: null}` are the same.
These changes rework the logic so that instead of generating a `null` key
for function invocations, we generate a variable called `<unknown>` which
shouldn't be able to collide with anything.
Fixes#35298.
PR Close#35481
In View Engine, host element of dynamically created component received attributes and classes extracted from component's selector. For example, if component selector is `[attr] .class`, the `attr` attribute and `.class` class will be add to host element. This commit adds similar logic to Ivy, to make sure this behavior is aligned with View Engine.
PR Close#34481
Before this change content queries with the `descendants: false` option, as implemented in ivy,
would not descendinto `<ng-container>` elements. This behaviour was different from the way the
View Engine worked. This change alligns ngIvy and VE behaviours when it comes to queries and the
`<ng-container>` elements and fixes a common bugs where a query target was placed inside the
`<ng-container>` element with a * directive on it.
Before:
```html
<needs-target>
<ng-container *ngIf="condition">
<div #target>...</div> <!-- this node would NOT match -->
</ng-container>
</needs-target>
```
After:
```html
<needs-target>
<ng-container *ngIf="condition">
<div #target>...</div> <!-- this node WILL match -->
</ng-container>
</needs-target>
```
Fixes#34768
PR Close#35384
When the same provider is resolved multiple times on the same node, the first invocation had the correct context, but all subsequent ones were incorrect because we were registering the hook multiple times under different indexes in `destroyHooks`.
Fixes#35167.
PR Close#35249
Currently the logic that handles ICUs located outside of i18n blocks may throw exceptions at runtime. The problem is caused by the fact that we store incorrect TNode index for previous TNode (index that includes HEADER_OFFSET) and do not store a flag whether this TNode is a parent or a sibling node. As a result, the logic that assembles the final output uses incorrect TNodes and in some cases throws exceptions (when incompatible structure is extracted from tView.data due to the incorrect index). This commit adjusts the index and captures whether TNode is a parent to make sure underlying logic manipulates correct TNode.
PR Close#35347
Given:
```
<div class="s1" [class]="null" [ngClass]="exp">
```
Notice that `[class]` binding is not a `string`. As a result the existing logic would not concatenate `[class]` with `class="s1"`. The resulting falsy value would than be sent to `ngClass` which would promptly clear all styles on the `<div>`
The new logic correctly handles falsy values for `[class]` bindings.
Fix#35335
PR Close#35350
Root cause is that for perf reasons we cache `LFrame` so that we don't have to allocate it all the time. To be extra fast we clear the `LFrame` on `enterView()` rather that on `leaveView()`. The implication of this strategy is that the deepest `LFrame` will retain objects until the `LFrame` allocation depth matches the deepest object.
The fix is to simply clear the `LFrame` on `leaveView()` rather then on `enterView()`
Fix#35148
PR Close#35156
In the `loadRenderer` we make an assumption that the value will always be an `LView`, but if there's a directive on the same node which injects `ViewContainerRef` the `LView` will be wrapped in an `LContainer`. These changes add a call to unwrap the value before we try to read the value off of it.
Fixes#35342.
PR Close#35343
Prior to this change, element namespace was not set for host elements of dynamically created components that resulted in incorrect rendering in a browser. This commit adds the logic to pick and set correct namespace for host element when component is created dynamically.
PR Close#35136
- Adds `TView` into `LFrame`, read the `TView` from `LView` on `enterView`.
- Before this change the `TView` was ofter looked up from `LView` as `lView[TVIEW]`. This is suboptimal since reading from an Array, requires that the read checks array size before the read. This means that such a read has a much higher cost than reading from the property directly. By passing in the `TView` explicitly it makes the code more explicit and faster.
- Some rearrangements of arguments so that `TView` would come before `LView` for consistency.
PR Close#35069
Inside `*ngFor` the second run of the styling instructions can get into situation where it tries to read a value from a binding which has not yet executed. As a result the read is `NO_CHANGE` value and subsequent property read cause an exception as it is of wrong type.
Fix#35118
PR Close#35133
`TNode.directives` was introduced in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/34938. Turns out that it is unnecessary because the information is already present it `TData` when combining with `TNode.directiveStart` and `TNode.directiveEnd`
Mainly this is true (conceptually):
```
expect(tNode.directives).toEqual(
tData.slice(
tNode.directivesStart,
tNode.directivesEnd - tNode.DirectivesStart -1
)
);
```
The refactoring removes `TNode.directives` and adds `TNode.directiveStyling` as we still need to keep location in the directive in `TNode`
PR Close#35050
These tests are used for perf testing and don't run as part of CI, as a result they bit-rotted. This fixes that. Long term these tests should be run as part of CI.
PR Close#35071
This change changes the priority order of static styling.
Current priority:
```
(least priority)
- Static
- Component
- Directives
- Template
- Dynamic Binding
- Component
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
The issue with the above priority is this use case:
```
<div style="color: red;" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
In the above case the directive will win and the resulting color will be `blue`. However a small change of adding interpolation to the example like so. (Style interpolation is coming in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/34202)
```
<div style="color: red; width: {{exp}}px" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
Changes the priority from static binding to interpolated binding which means now the resulting color is `red`. It is very surprising that adding an unrelated interpolation and style can change the `color` which was not changed. To fix that we need to make sure that the static values are associated with priority of the source (directive or template) where they were declared. The new resulting priority is:
```
(least priority)
- Component
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
PR Close#34938
The current logic pulls multiproviders up to the parent module's
provider list. The result is that the multi provider being defined both in
the imported ModuleWithProviders and the parent and getting an extra
item in the multi provided array of values. This PR fixes that problem
by not pulling providers in ModuleWithProviders up to the parent module.
PR Close#34914
We had some logic for generating and passing in the `elIndex` parameter into the `hostBindings` function, but it wasn't actually being used for anything. The only place left that had a reference to it was the `StylingBuilder` and it only stored it without referencing it again.
PR Close#34969
Previously we would write to class/style as strings `element.className` and `element.style.cssText`. Turns out that approach is good for initial render but not good for updates. Updates using this approach are problematic because we have to check to see if there was an out of bound write to style and than perform reconciliation. This also requires the browser to bring up CSS parser which is expensive.
Another problem with old approach is that we had to queue the DOM writes and flush them twice. Once on element advance instruction and once in `hostBindings`. The double flushing is expensive but it also means that a directive can observe that styles are not yet written (they are written after directive executes.)
The new approach uses `element.classList.add/remove` and `element.style.setProperty/removeProperty` API for updates only (it continues to use `element.className` and `element.style.cssText` for initial render as it is cheaper.) The other change is that the styling changes are applied immediately (no queueing). This means that it is the instruction which computes priority. In some circumstances it may result in intermediate writes which are than overwritten with new value. (This should be rare)
Overall this change deletes most of the previous code and replaces it with new simplified implement. The simplification results in code savings.
PR Close#34804
This change introduces several functions for manipulating items in an array in an efficient (binary search) way.
- `arraySplice` a faster version of `Array.splice()`.
- `arrayInsert` a faster version of `Array.splice(index, 0, value)`.
- `arrayInsert2` a faster version of `Array.splice(index, 0, value1, value2)`.
- `arrayInsertSorted` a way to insert a value into sorted list.
- `arrayRemoveSorted` a way to remove a value from a sorted list.
- `arrayIndexOfSorted` a way to find a value in a sorted list.
- `ArrayMap` Efficient implementation of `Map` as an `Array`.
- `arrayMapSet`, `arrayMapGet`, `arrayMapIndexOf`, and `arrayMapDelete` for manipulating `ArrayMap`s.
PR Close#34804
NOTE: This change must be reverted with previous deletes so that it code remains in build-able state.
This change deletes old styling code and replaces it with a simplified styling algorithm.
The mental model for the new algorithm is:
- Create a linked list of styling bindings in the order of priority. All styling bindings ere executed in compiled order and than a linked list of bindings is created in priority order.
- Flush the style bindings at the end of `advance()` instruction. This implies that there are two flush events. One at the end of template `advance` instruction in the template. Second one at the end of `hostBindings` `advance` instruction when processing host bindings (if any).
- Each binding instructions effectively updates the string to represent the string at that location. Because most of the bindings are additive, this is a cheap strategy in most cases. In rare cases the strategy requires removing tokens from the styling up to this point. (We expect that to be rare case)S Because, the bindings are presorted in the order of priority, it is safe to resume the processing of the concatenated string from the last change binding.
PR Close#34616
crisbeto
Paul Gschwendtner
Doug Parker
Pawel Kozlowski
Miško Hevery
Andrew Kushnir
KostyaTretyak
Greg Magolan
JiaLiPassion
zhuyujie
Andrew Scott