Currently undecorated classes are intentionally not processed
with ngcc. This is causing unexpected behavior because decorator
handlers such as `base_def.ts` are specifically interested in class
definitions without top-level decorators, so that the base definition
can be generated if there are Angular-specific class members.
In order to ensure that undecorated base-classes work as expected
with Ivy, we need to run the decorator handlers for all top-level
class declarations (not only for those with decorators). This is similar
to when `ngtsc` runs decorator handlers when analyzing source-files.
Resolves FW-1355. Fixes https://github.com/angular/components/issues/16178
PR Close#30821
Currently our plan is to skip the publish, docgen, and update steps for this package.
During RC, we'll determine if the breaking change is too difficult for users, in which case we might restore the package for another major.
PR Close#29550
In ESM5 decorated classes can be indicated by calls to `__decorate()`.
Previously the `ReflectionHost.findDecoratedClasses()` call would identify
helper calls of the form:
```
SomeClass = tslib_1.__decorate(...);
```
But it was missing calls of the form:
```
SomeClass = SomeClass_1 = tslib_1.__decorate(...);
```
This form is common in `@NgModule()` decorations, where the class
being decorated is referenced inside the decorator or another
member.
This commit now ensures that a chain of assignments, of any length,
is now identified as a class decoration if it results in a call to
`__decorate()`.
Fixes#27841
PR Close#27848
This integration test was created from a vanilla CLI generated
project with the following modifications:
* remove `PercentPipe` usage from `app.component.html`
- these are not yet supported by ivy
* changed `ng test` in `package.json` to only to `ng build`
- right now we can only confirm that the app will build
* hard-code `ngDevMode` in `index.html`
- the CLI does not yet set this correctly
PR Close#26403
Paul Gschwendtner
Pete Bacon Darwin
Alex Eagle