Previously, event listeners for component output events attached on an
Angular custom element before inserting it into the DOM (i.e. before
instantiating the underlying component) didn't fire for events emitted
during initialization lifecycle hooks, such as `ngAfterContentInit`,
`ngAfterViewInit`, `ngOnChanges` (initial call) and `ngOnInit`.
The reason was that that `NgElementImpl` [subscribed to events][1]
_after_ calling [ngElementStrategy#connect()][2], which is where the
[initial change detection][3] takes place (running the initialization
lifecycle hooks).
This commit fixes this by:
1. Ensuring `ComponentNgElementStrategy#events` is defined and available
for subscribing to, even before instantiating the component.
2. Ensuring `NgElementImpl` subscribes to `NgElementStrategy#events`
before calling `NgElementStrategy#connect()` (which initializes the
component instance).
Jira issue: [FW-2010](https://angular-team.atlassian.net/browse/FW-2010)
[1]: c0143cb2ab/packages/elements/src/create-custom-element.ts (L167-L170)
[2]: c0143cb2ab/packages/elements/src/create-custom-element.ts (L164)
[3]: c0143cb2ab/packages/elements/src/component-factory-strategy.ts (L158)Fixes#36141
PR Close#36161
Previously, the correct behavior of Angular custom elements relied on
the constructor being called (and thus the `injector` property being
initialized). However, some polyfills (e.g. `document-register-element`)
do not call the constructor of custom elements, which resulted in the
`injector` property being undefined and the `NgElementStrategy` failing
to be instantiated.
This commit fixes it by being tolerant to the `injector` property being
undefined and falling back to the injector passed to the
`createCustomElement()` config.
NOTE:
We don't have proper tests exercising the situation where the
constructor is not called. For now this is tested using a Google
internal test suite (which is how this issue was caught).
This commit also adds a rudimentary unit test to emulate this situation.
PR Close#36114
Previously, if an element started out as a regular `HTMLElement` (not a
Custom Element) and was later upgraded to a Custom Element, any
properties corresponding to component inputs that were set on the
element before upgrading it would not be captured correctly and thus not
reflected on the instantiated component.
This commit fixes it by ensuring that such properties are captured
correctly.
Jira issue: [FW-2006](https://angular-team.atlassian.net/browse/FW-2006)
Fixes#30848Closes#31416
PR Close#36114
Previously, the `TestStrategy` `NgElementStrategy` used in
`createCustomElement()` tests was created once and re-used in each test
(due to complications related to how `customElements.register()` works).
As a result, the `TestStrategy` instance's state (e.g. inputs) could be
polluted from previous tests and affect subsequent ones.
This commit ensures the strategy instance is reset before each test.
PR Close#36114
Previously, helper modules/components classes were declared even if the
tests were not run (because the environment did not support Custom
Elements for example).
This commit moves the declaration of the helpers inside the `describe()`
block, so they are not declared unnecessarily. This is in preparation of
adding more helpers that need to access variables declared inside the
`describe()` block.
PR Close#36114
`createCustomElements()` creates some getters/setters for properties
corresponding to component inputs that delegate to the
`NgElementStrategy`. However, it is not guaranteed that the element's
`NgElementStrategy` will have been created when these getters/setters
are called, because some polyfills (e.g. `document-register-element`) do
not call the constructor.
Previously, trying to get/set input properties before connecting the
element to the DOM (via `connectedCallback()`) would fail due to
`NgElementStrategy` not being created.
This commit ensures that the `NgElementStrategy` is always created
before used inside the input property getters/setters (similar to how it
is done for other methods of `NgElement`).
Mentioned in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/31416/files#r300326698.
PR Close#36114
The `elements` tests were disabled on Saucelabs, because they were failing on IE10. The problem was that we were loading an es2015 file from npm directly, causing a syntax error. These changes transpile the file to es5.
PR Close#36929
1. update jasmine to 3.5
2. update @types/jasmine to 3.5
3. update @types/jasminewd2 to 2.0.8
Also fix several cases, the new jasmine 3 will help to create test cases correctly,
such as in the `jasmine 2.x` version, the following case will pass
```
expect(1 == 2);
```
But in jsamine 3, the case will need to be
```
expect(1 == 2).toBeTrue();
```
PR Close#34625
Previously, when an input property was initially set to `undefined` it
would not be correctly recognized as a change (and trigger
`ngOnChanges()`).
This commit ensures that explicitly setting an input to `undefined` is
correctly handled the same as setting the property to any other value.
This aligns the behavior of Angular custom elements with that of the
corresponding components when used directly (not as custom elements).
PR Close#36140
Previously, when an input property was set on an `NgElement` before
instantiating the underlying component, the `SimpleChange` object passed
to `ngOnChanges()` would have `firstChange` set to false, even if this
was the first change (as far as the component instance was concerned).
This commit fixes this by ensuring `SimpleChange#firstChange` is set to
true on first change, regardless if the property was set before or after
instantiating the component. This alignthe behavior of Angular custom
elements with that of the corresponding components when used directly
(not as custom elements).
Jira issue: [FW-2007](https://angular-team.atlassian.net/browse/FW-2007)
Fixes#36130
PR Close#36140
Fixes the following issues which caused the `elements` unit tests to break on IE:
1. `core.js` wasn't included which caused an error about `Promise` and `Symbol` to be thrown.
2. We were using a version of `@webcomponents/custom-elements` which was shipping ES6 code to npm. As a result, IE was throwing a syntax error.
PR Close#35940
This is a breaking change in nodejs rules 0.40.0 as part of the API review & cleanup for the 1.0 release. Their APIs are identical as ts_web_test was just karma_web_test without the config_file attribute.
PR Close#33802
Fixes all TypeScript failures caused by enabling the `--strict`
flag for test source files. We also want to enable the strict
options for tests as the strictness enforcement improves the
overall codehealth, unveiled common issues and additionally it
allows us to enable `strict` in the `tsconfig.json` that is picked
up by IDE's.
PR Close#30993
Brings in ts_library fixes required to get angular/angular building after 0.32.0:
typescript: exclude typescript lib declarations in node_module_library transitive_declarations
typescript: remove override of @bazel/tsetse (+1 squashed commit)
@npm//node_modules/foobar:foobar.js labels changed to @npm//:node_modules/foobar/foobar.js with fix for bazelbuild/rules_nodejs#802
also updates to rules_rass commit compatible with rules_nodejs 0.32.0
PR Close#31325
Brings in ts_library fixes required to get angular/angular building after 0.32.0:
typescript: exclude typescript lib declarations in node_module_library transitive_declarations
typescript: remove override of @bazel/tsetse (+1 squashed commit)
@npm//node_modules/foobar:foobar.js labels changed to @npm//:node_modules/foobar/foobar.js with fix for bazelbuild/rules_nodejs#802
also updates to rules_rass commit compatible with rules_nodejs 0.32.0
PR Close#31019
We are close enough to blacklist a few test targets, rather than whitelist targets to run...
Because bazel rules can be composed of other rules that don't inherit tags automatically,
I had to explicitly mark all of our ts_library and ng_module targes with "ivy-local" and
"ivy-jit" tags so that we can create a query that excludes all fixme- tagged targets even
if those targets are composed of other targets that don't inherit this tag.
This is the updated overview of ivy related bazel tags:
- ivy-only: target that builds or runs only under ivy
- fixme-ivy-jit: target that doesn't yet build or run under ivy with --compile=jit
- fixme-ivy-local: target that doesn't yet build or run under ivy with --compile=local
- no-ivy-jit: target that is not intended to build or run under ivy with --compile=jit
- no-ivy-local: target that is not intended to build or run under ivy with --compile=local
PR Close#26471
When using ViewEncapsulation.ShadowDom, Angular will not remove the child nodes of the DOM node a root Component is bootstrapped into. This enables developers building Angular Elements to use the `<slot>` element to do native content projection.
PR Close#24861
All errors for existing fields have been detected and suppressed with a
`!` assertion.
Issue/24571 is tracking proper clean up of those instances.
One-line change required in ivy/compilation.ts, because it appears that
the new syntax causes tsickle emitted node to no longer track their
original sourceFiles.
PR Close#24572
George Kalpakas
Joey Perrott
crisbeto
Greg Magolan
JiaLiPassion
Paul Gschwendtner
Balint Mero
Alex Rickabaugh
Wassim Chegham
Misko Hevery
Igor Minar
Rob Wormald
Roope Hakulinen
Rado Kirov
Alex Eagle
Andrew Seguin