For URLs that use auxiliary route outlets in the second or following path segments,
when removing the auxiliary route segment, parenthesis remain for the primary outlet segment.
This causes the following error when trying to reload an URL: "Cannot match any route".
The commit adds a check for this scenario, serializing the URL as "a/b" instead of "a/(b)".
PR Close#24656
PR Close#37163
This PR changes the logic for determining when to skip route processing from
using the URL of the last attempted navigation to the actual resulting URL after
that transition.
Because guards may prevent navigation and reset the browser URL, the raw
URL of the previous transition may not match the actual URL of the
browser at the end of the navigation process. For that reason, we need to use
`urlAfterRedirects` instead.
Other notes:
These checks in scheduleNavigation were added in eb2ceff4ba
The test still passes and, more surprisingly, passes if the checks are removed
completely. There have likely been changes to the navigation handling that
handle the test in a different way. That said, it still appears to be important
to keep the checks there in some capacity because it does affect how many
navigation events occur. This addresses an issue that came up in #16710: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/16710#issuecomment-634869739
This also partially addresses #13586 in fixing history for imperative
navigations that are cancelled by guards.
PR Close#37408
PR #13380 added support for `null` and `undefined` but the type on the parameter was not updated.
This would result in a compilation error if `fullTemplateTypeCheck` is enabled.
Fixes#36544
PR Close#37018
This change aligns behavior for resolvers which return EMPTY. Currently EMPTY resolvers have inconsistent behavior:
- One resolver that returns EMPTY => won't navigate and just ends on ResolveStart router event.
- Two resolvers where both return EMPTY => throws "Error: Uncaught (in promise): EmptyError: no elements in sequence"
- Two resolvers where one returns a value and the other one returns EMPTY => Navigates successfully.
With this change any EMPTY resolver will cancel navigation.
BREAKING CHANGE: Any resolver which return EMPTY will cancel navigation.
If you want to allow the navigation to continue, you will need to update the resolvers to emit
some value, (i.e. defaultIfEmpty(...), of(...), etc).
PR Close#24195
PR Close#24621
A CanLoad guard returning UrlTree cancels current navigation and redirects.
This matches the behavior available to `CanActivate` guards added in #26521.
Note that this does not affect preloading. A `CanLoad` guard blocks any
preloading. That is, any route with a `CanLoad` guard is not preloaded
and the guards are not executed as part of preloading.
fixes#28306
PR Close#36610
This PR adds test case to cover a failure that was detected after
merging #36302. That commit will be reverted and will need a new PR that
does not cause this test to fail.
PR Close#36699
fixes#34614
There's an edge case where if I use two (or more) sibling <router-outlet>s in two (or more) child routes where their parent route doesn't have a component then preactivation will trigger all canDeactivate checks with the same component because it will use wrong OutletContext.
PR Close#36302
1. update jasmine to 3.5
2. update @types/jasmine to 3.5
3. update @types/jasminewd2 to 2.0.8
Also fix several cases, the new jasmine 3 will help to create test cases correctly,
such as in the `jasmine 2.x` version, the following case will pass
```
expect(1 == 2);
```
But in jsamine 3, the case will need to be
```
expect(1 == 2).toBeTrue();
```
PR Close#34625
Resubmit #31168 now that google3 tests can pass. This requires http://cl/272696717 to be patched.
Original description from jasonaden:
Without this change when using UrlTree redirects in urlUpdateStrategy="eager", the URL would get
updated to the target location, then redirected. This resulted in having an additional entry in the
history and thus the back button would be broken (going back would land on the URL causing a new
redirect).
Additionally, there was a bug where the redirect, even without urlUpdateStrategy="eager", could
create a history with too many entries. This was due to kicking off a new navigation within the
navigation cancelling logic. With this PR the new navigation is pushed to the next tick with a
setTimeout, allowing the page being redirected from to be cancelled before starting a new
navigation.
Related to #27148
fix(router): adjust UrlTree redirect to replace URL if in eager update
Fix lint errors
PR Close#32988
Fixes all TypeScript failures caused by enabling the `--strict`
flag for test source files. We also want to enable the strict
options for tests as the strictness enforcement improves the
overall codehealth, unveiled common issues and additionally it
allows us to enable `strict` in the `tsconfig.json` that is picked
up by IDE's.
PR Close#30993
Without this change when using UrlTree redirects in `urlUpdateStrategy="eager"`, the URL would get updated to the target location, then redirected. This resulted in having an additional entry in the `history` and thus the `back` button would be broken (going back would land on the URL causing a new redirect).
Additionally, there was a bug where the redirect, even without `urlUpdateStrategy="eager"`, could create a history with too many entries. This was due to kicking off a new navigation within the navigation cancelling logic. With this PR the new navigation is pushed to the next tick with a `setTimeout`, allowing the page being redirected from to be cancelled before starting a new navigation.
Related to #27148
PR Close#31168
In some cases where multiple navigations happen to the same URL, the router will not process a given URL. In those cases, we fall into logic that resets state for the next navigation. One piece of this resetting is to set the `browserUrlTree` to the most recent `urlAfterRedirects`i.
However, there was bug in this logic because in some cases the `urlAfterRedirects` is a stale value. This happens any time a URL won't be processed, and the previous URL will also not be processed. This creates unpredictable behavior, not the least of which ends up being a broken `back` button.
This PR kicks off new navigations with the current value the router assumes is in the browser. All the logic around how to handle future navigations is based on this value compared to the current transition, so it's important to kick off all new navigations with the current value so in the edge case described above we don't end up with an old value being set into `browserUrlTree`.
Fixes#30340
Related to #30160
PR Close#30344
There was a problem with a combination of the `eager` URL update, browser `back` button, and hybrid applications. Details provided in internal ticket http://b/123667227.
This fix handles the problem by setting `router.browserUrlTree` when all conditions have failed, meaning the browser doesn't do anything with the navigation other than update internal data structures. Without this change, the problem was an old value was stored in `router.broserUrlTree` causing some new navigations to be compared to an old value and breaking future navigations.
PR Close#30160
Prior to this change, if a navigation was ongoing and a new one came in, the router could get into a state where `router.currentNavigation` was `null` even though a navigation was executing. This change moves where we set the `currentNavigation` value so it's inside a `switchMap`. This solves the problem because the `finally` on the `switchMap` had been setting `currentNavigation` to `null` but the new `currentNavigation` value would have already been set. Essentially this was a timing problem and is resolved with this change.
Fixes#29389#29590
PR Close#29636
When a UrlTree of root url was returned by a guard as a redirection, the
navigation was not processed. The issue came from the error handler which
incorrectly marked the router as already navigated.
Fixes#27845
PR Close#28271
With #27680, a bug was fixed where multiple redirects using `eager` URL update could cause navigation to fail. However, that fix introduced a problem where with `skipLocationChange` enabled, the URL tree rendered was not properly stored for reference. This specifically caused an issue with named router outlets and subsequent navigations not being recognized.
This PR stores the correct `UrlTree` for reference with later navigations. It fixes the regression introdued with #27680.
Fixes#28200
PR Close#28300
Previously when testing code injected the Compiler, it received the
top-level Compiler implementation defined in linker/compiler.ts
(and governed by the __PRE_R3__ switch). Code running under the
TestBed, however, should always use a TestBed-aware Compiler
implementation.
This commit adds such an implementation to the TestBedRender3,
which passes compiled modules through the _compileNgModule()
function.
With this change, 3 formerly disabled router integration tests
now pass.
FW-855 #resolve
PR Close#28033
Previously, we had the logic to schedule a change detection tick
inside markViewDirty(). This is fine when used in markDirty(),
the user-facing API, because it should always schedule change
detection. However, this doesn't work when used in markForCheck()
because historically markForCheck() does not trigger change
detection.
To be backwards compatible, this commit moves the scheduling
logic out of markViewDirty() and into markDirty(), so
markForCheck no longer triggers a tick.
PR Close#28048
Navigating to a route such as `/users`, you may get redirected to `/login`. Previously, if you go then route to `/users` again the URL will end up showing `/users` after the second redirect. This only happened in `UrlUpdateStrategy="eager"`. This is now fixed so after the second redirect, the URL shows the correct page.
Fixes#27116
PR Close#27523
This option means guards and resolvers will ignore changes when a provided predicate function returns `false`. This supports use cases where an application needs to ignore some param updates but not others. For example, changing a sort param in the URL might need to be ignored, whereas changing the a `project` param might require re-run of guards and resolvers.
Related to #26861#18253#27464
PR Close#27682
It looks like `fixmeIvy` imports were accidentally removed from Router integration tests, thus causing build errors. The necessary imports are now restored and the project should build normally.
PR Close#27720
`NgModule` requires that `Component`s/`Directive`s/`Pipe`s are listed in
declarations, and that each `Component`s/`Directive`s/`Pipe` is declared
in exactly one `NgModule`. This change adds runtime checks to ensure
that these sementics are true at runtime.
There will need to be seperate set of checks for the AoT path of the
codebase to verify that same set of semantics hold. Due to current
design there does not seem to be an easy way to share the two checks
because JIT deal with references where as AoT deals with AST nodes.
PR Close#27604
Navigating to a route such as `/users`, you may get redirected to `/login`. Previously, if you go then route to `/users` again the URL will end up showing `/users` after the second redirect. This only happened in `UrlUpdateStrategy="eager"`. This is now fixed so after the second redirect, the URL shows the correct page.
Fixes#27116
PR Close#27523
This option means guards and resolvers will ignore changes to matrix parameters. Guards and resolvers will be rerun when the path changes, when path parameters change, or when query parameters change.
The primary use case for such a mode is when updating the UI and getting the URL to be in sync with local changes. For example, if displaying a sortable table, changing the sort direction is often handled by the table itself. But you would want to update the URL to be in sync with what's being displayed to the user. As long as the table sort direction is stored as a matrix parameter, you can use this option to update the URL without causing the overhead of re-running guards and resolvers.
Related to #26861#18253
PR Close#27464