This commit improves `ExpressionChangedAfterChecked` error message for attributes by including attribute name and the content of the entire expression that contains interpolation(s). In order to achieve that, metadata is now stored in `TData` array when `attribute` and `attributeInterpolate` instructions are being called (similar to `property` and `propertyInterpolate` instructions).
PR Close#34505
Fixes classes with trailing or leading space that are passed to `ngClass` (e.g. `{'foo ': bar}`) not being applied in Ivy. The issue comes from the fact that when the styling differ builds up the style map it uses the trimmed key to look up the value in the map that uses non-trimmed keys.
Fixes#34476.
PR Close#34539
Follow-up from [this discussion](https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/33419#discussion_r339296216). In Ivy we don't use the schema to validate tag names, but instead we use feature detection to figure out whether an element is supported. While this should generally be more accurate, it'll also end up throwing for some more innocent cases. E.g. now Ivy throws an error for `main` elements in IE which is accurate since IE doesn't support the element, but is annoying since there is no functionality attached.
These changes switch to logging a warning instead, similarly to what we're doing for unknown properties.
PR Close#34524
The `getProjectAsAttrValue` in `node_selector_matcher` finds the
ProjectAs marker and then additionally checks that the marker appears in
an even index of the node attributes because "attribute names are stored
at even indexes". This is true for "regular" attribute bindings but
classes, styles, bindings, templates, and i18n do not necessarily follow
this rule because there can be an uneven number of them, causing the
next "special" attribute "name" to appear at an odd index. To address
this issue, ensure ngProjectAs is placed right after "regular"
attributes.
PR Close#34617
Prior to this commit, there were no `advance` instructions generated before `i18nExp` instructions and as a result, lifecycle hooks for components used inside i18n blocks were flushed too late. This commit adds the logic to generate `advance` instructions in front of `i18nExp` ones (similar to what we have in other places like interpolations, property bindings, etc), so that the necessary lifecycle hooks are flushed before expression value is captured.
PR Close#34436
The main logic of the `InheritDefinitionFeature` is to go through the prototype chain of a given Component and merge all Angular-specific information onto that Component def. The problem happens in case there is a Component in a hierarchy that also contains the `InheritDefinitionFeature` (i.e. it extends some other Component), so it inherits all Angular-specific information from its super class. As a result, the root Component may end up having duplicate information inherited from different Components in hierarchy.
Let's consider the following structure: `GrandChild` extends `Child` that extends `Base` and the `Base` class has a `HostListener`. In this scenario `GrandChild` and `Child` will have `InheritDefinitionFeature` included into the `features` list. The processing will happend in the following order:
- `Child` inherits `HostListener` from the `Base` class
- `GrandChild` inherits `HostListener` from the `Child` class
- since `Child` has a parent, `GrandChild` also inherits from the `Base` class
The result is that the `GrandChild` def has duplicated host listener, which is not correct.
This commit introduces additional logic that checks whether we came across a def that has `InheritDefinitionFeature` feature (which means that this def already inherited information from its super classes). If that's the case, we skip further fields-related inheritance logic, but keep going though the prototype chain to look for super classes that contain other features (like NgOnChanges), that we need to invoke for a given Component def.
PR Close#34244
Prior to this change, the ExpressionChangedAfterChecked error thrown in Ivy was missing useful information that was available in View Engine, specifically: missing property name for proprty bindings and also the content of the entire property interpolation (only a changed value was displayed) if one of expressions was changed unexpectedly. This commit improves the error message by including the mentioned information into the error text.
PR Close#34381
The ordering matters because we don't currently throw if multiple
configurations are provided (i.e. provider has *both* useExisting and
useFactory). We should actually throw an error in this case, but to
avoid another breaking change in v9, this PR simply aligns the Ivy
behavior with ViewEngine.
PR Close#34433
Currently we only run Saucelabs on PRs using the legacy View Engine
build. Switching that build to Ivy is not trivial and there are various
options:
1. Updating the R3 switches to use POST_R3 by default. At first glance,
this doesn't look easy because the current ngtsc switch logic seems to
be unidirectional (only PRE_R3 to POST_R3).
2. Updating the legacy setup to run with Ivy. This sounds like the easiest
solution at first.. but it turns out to be way more complicated. Packages
would need to be built with ngtsc using legacy tools (i.e. first building
the compiler-cli; and then building packages) and View Engine only tests
would need to be determined and filtered out. Basically it will result in
re-auditing all test targets. This is contradictory to the fact that we have
this information in Bazel already.
3. Creating a new job that runs tests on Saucelabs with Bazel. We specify
fine-grained test targets that should run. This would be a good start
(e.g. acceptance tests) and also would mean that we do not continue maintaining
the legacy setup..
This commit implements the third option as it allows us to move forward
with the general Bazel migration. We don't want to spend too much time
on our legacy setup since it will be removed anyway in the future.
PR Close#34277
We've got some tests that assert that the generate DOM looks correct. The problem is that IE changes the attribute order in `innerHTML` which caused the tests to fail. I've reworked the relevant tests not to assert directly against `innerHTML`.
PR Close#34305
Prior to this commit, values wrapped into SafeStyle were not handled correctly in [style.prop] bindings in case style sanitizer is present (when template contains some style props that require sanitization). Style sanitizer was not unwrapping values in case a given prop doesn't require sanitization.As a result, wrapped values were used as final styling values (see https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/packages/core/src/render3/styling/bindings.ts#L620). This commit updates the logic to unwrap safe values in sanitizer in case no sanitization is required.
PR Close#34286
Prior to this commit, calling change detection for destroyed views resulted in errors being thrown in some cases. This commit adds a check to make sure change detection is invoked for non-destroyed views only.
PR Close#34241
Prior to this commit, if a template (for example, generated using structural directive such as *ngIf) contains `ngProjectAs` attribute, it was not included into attributes array in generated code and as a result, these templates were not matched at runtime during content projection. This commit adds the logic to append `ngProjectAs` values into corresponding element's attribute arrays, so content projection works as expected.
PR Close#34200
Prior to this commit, i18n runtime code failed with the exception saying that no provider was found for ChangeDetectorRef for a pipe used in ICU. The problem happened because the underlying `createViewRef` function was not taking into account IcuContainer as a valid TNodeType. This commit updates the `createViewRef` function to return corresponding ViewRef for TNodeType.IcuContainer.
PR Close#34198
Fixes ngtsc incorrectly logging an unknown element diagnostic for HTML elements that are inside an SVG `foreignObject` with the `xhtml` namespace.
Fixes#34171.
PR Close#34178
Prior to this commit, the unknown element can happen twice for AOT-compiled components: once during compilation and once again at runtime. Due to the fact that `schemas` information is not present on Component and NgModule defs after AOT compilation, the second check (at runtime) may fail, even though the same check was successful at compile time. This commit updates the code to avoid the second check for AOT-compiled components by checking whether `schemas` information is present in a logic that executes the unknown element check.
PR Close#34024
Prior to this commit, there was a runtime check in i18n logic to make sure "other" case is always present in an ICU. That was not a requirement in View Engine, so ICUs that previously worked may produce errors. This commit removes that restriction and adds support for ICUs without "other" cases.
PR Close#34042
When inserting a `viewRef` it is possible to not provide
an `index`, which is regarded as appending to the end of
the container.
If the `viewRef` already exists in the container, then
this results in a move. But there was a fault in the logic
that computed where to insert the `viewRef` that did not
account for the fact that the `viewRef` was already in
the container, so the insertion `index` was outside the
bounds of the array.
Fixes#33924
PR Close#34052
Prior to this commit, all styles extracted from Component's template (defined using <style> tags) were ignored by JIT compiler, so only `styles` array values defined in @Component decorator were used. This change updates JIT compiler to take styles extracted from the template into account. It also ensures correct order where `styles` array values are applied first and template styles are applied second.
PR Close#34017
This commit fixes a compatibility bug where pre-order lifecycle
hooks (onInit, doCheck, OnChanges) for directives on the same
host node were executed based on the order the directives were
matched, rather than the order the directives were instantiated
(i.e. injection order).
This discrepancy can cause issues with forms, where it is common
to inject NgControl and try to extract its control property in
ngOnInit. As the NgControl directive is injected, it should be
instantiated before the control value accessor directive (and
thus its hooks should run first). This ensures that the NgControl
ngOnInit can set up the form control before the ngOnInit
for the control value accessor tries to access it.
Closes#32522
PR Close#34026
The assertion that we have in the `directiveInject` instruction is too restrictive and we came across some pattern where it throws unnecessarily. This commit removes that assertion for now and more detailed investigation is needed to decide is we need to restrict the set of TNodeType again.
This commit also adds a test which triggered the TNodeType.View to come up in the `directiveInject` instruction, so it might be useful to avoid regressions during further refactoring.
PR Close#33948
When asking for a ViewContainerRef on <ng-container> we do reuse <ng-container> comment
node as a LContainer's anachor. Before this fix the act of re-using a <ng-container>'s
comment node would result in this comment node being re-appended to the DOM in the wrong
place. With the fix in this PR we make sure that re-using <ng-container>'s comment node
doesn't result in unwanted DOM manipulation (ng-gontainer's comment node is already part
of the DOM and doesn't have to be re-created / re-appended).
PR Close#33816
Prior to this commit the assert that we have in `directiveInject` (assert introduced recently) didn't include IcuContainer TNode type and as a result, the error is thrown in case pipes with dependencies are used inside ICUs. This commit extends the assert to allow for IcuContainer TNode types.
PR Close#33832
Currently if a consumer does something like the following, the object literal will be shared across the two elements and any instances of the component template. The same applies to array literals:
```
<div [someDirective]="{}"></div>
<div [someDirective]="{}"></div>
```
These changes make it so that we generate a pure function even if an object is constant so that each instance gets its own object.
Note that the original design for this fix included moving the pure function factories into the `consts` array. In the process of doing so I realized that pure function are also used inside of directive host bindings which means that we don't have access to the `consts`.
These changes also:
* Fix an issue that meant that the `pureFunction0` instruction could only be run during creation mode.
* Make the `getConstant` utility slightly more convenient to use. This isn't strictly required for these changes to work, but I had made it as a part of a larger refactor that I ended up reverting.
PR Close#33705
This is a breaking change in nodejs rules 0.40.0 as part of the API review & cleanup for the 1.0 release. Their APIs are identical as ts_web_test was just karma_web_test without the config_file attribute.
PR Close#33802
Prior to this change, setting style prop value to undefined or empty string would not result in resetting prop value in case the style prop is defined using [style.prop.px] syntax. The problem is that the check for empty value (and thus reseting the value) considered successful only in case of `null` value. This commit updates the check to use `isStylingValueDefined` function that also checks for undefined and empty string.
PR Close#33780
Prior to this change, ComponentFactory.create function invocation in Ivy retained the content of the host element (in case host element reference or CSS seelctor is provided as an argument). This behavior is different in View Engine, where the content of the host element was cleared, except for the case when ShadowDom encapsulation is used (to make sure native slot projection works). This commit aligns Ivy and View Engine and makes sure the host element is cleared before component content insertion.
PR Close#33487
Prior to this change, namespaced elements such as SVG elements would not
participate correctly in directive matching as their namespace was not
ignored, which was the case with the View Engine compiler. This led to
incorrect behavior at runtime and template type checking.
This commit resolved the issue by ignoring the namespace of elements and
attributes like they were in View Engine.
Fixes#32061
PR Close#33555
When debugging `LView`s it is easy to get lost since all of them have
the same name. This change does three things:
1. It makes `TView` have an explicit type:
- `Host`: for the top level `TView` for bootstrap
- `Component`: for the `TView` which represents components template
- `Embedded`: for the `TView` which represents an embedded template
2. It changes the name of `LView` to `LHostView`, `LComponentView`, and
`LEmbeddedView` depending on the `TView` type.
3. For `LComponentView` and `LEmbeddedView` we also append the name of
of the `context` constructor. The result is that we have `LView`s which
are name as: `LComponentView_MyComponent` and `LEmbeddedView_NgIfContext`.
The above changes will make it easier to understand the structure of the
application when debugging.
NOTE: All of these are behind `ngDevMode` and will get removed in
production application.
PR Close#33449
Prior to this commit, i18n runtime logic used `elementAttributeInternal` function (that uses `setAttribute` function under the hood) for all elements where i18n attributes are present. However the `<ng-container>` elements in a template may also have i18n attributes and calling `setAttribute` fails, since they are represented as comment nodes in DOM. This commit ensures that we call `setAttribute` on nodes with TNodeType.Element type (that support that operation) only.
PR Close#33599
Andrew Kushnir
crisbeto
Andrew Scott
Paul Gschwendtner
Pawel Kozlowski
Pete Bacon Darwin
Kara Erickson
horn
Miško Hevery
Greg Magolan
JoostK
JiaLiPassion