These files have not been formatted properly, due to issues in the
`gulp format*` tasks. See previous commits (or #31295) for more details.
PR Close#31295
Add an IndexingContext class to store indexing information and a
transformer module to generate indexing analysis. Integrate the indexing
module with the rest of NgtscProgram and add integration tests.
Closes#30959
PR Close#31151
Change the Element constructor in r3_ast to create a new ParseSourceSpan when regenerating it rather than extending an object, which does not contain the overloaded toString().
PR Close#31190
The function `bind` has been internalized wherever it was needed, this PR makes sure that it is no longer publicly exported.
FW-1385 #resolve
PR Close#31131
This commit fixes a couple of issues with TS 3.5 compatibility in order to
unblock migration of g3. Mostly 'any's are added, and there are no behavior
changes.
PR Close#31174
Move the definition leadingTriviaChars included in parsing a template
to the parameters of parseTemplate. This allows overriding of the
default leadingTriviaChars, which is needed by some pipelines like the
indexing pipeline because leadingTriviaChars may throw off the recorded
span of selectors.
PR Close#31136
Currently the `RecursiveAstVisitor` that is part of the template expression
parser does not _always_ properly pass through the context that can be
specified when visting a given expression. Only a handful of AST types
pass through the context while others are accidentally left out. This causes
unexpected and inconsistent behavior and basically makes the `context`
parameter not usable if the type of template expression is not known.
e.g. the template variable assignment migration currently depends on
the `RecursiveAstVisitor` but sometimes breaks if developers use
things like conditionals in their template variable assignments.
Fixes#31043
PR Close#31085
A temporary check is in place to determine whether a key in an object
literal needs to be quoted during emit. Previously, only the presence of
a dash caused a key to become quoted, this however is not sufficient for
@angular/flex-layout to compile properly as it has dots in its inputs.
This commit extends the check to also use quotes when a dot is present.
Fixes#30114
PR Close#31146
Currently each property binding generates an instruction like this:
```
property('prop1', ctx.value1);
property('prop2', ctx.value2);
```
The problem is that we're repeating the call to `property` for each of the properties. Since the `property` instruction returns itself, we can chain all of the calls which is more compact and it looks like this:
```
property('prop1', ctx.value1)('prop2', ctx.value2);
```
These changes implement the chaining behavior for regular property bindings and for synthetic ones, however interpolated ones are still handled like before, because they use a separate instruction.
This PR resolves FW-1389.
PR Close#31078
i18nExp now uses `bind` internally rather than having the compiler generate it in order to bring it in line with other functions like `textBinding` & `property`.
FW-1384 #resolve
PR Close#31089
- Splits core functionality off into a shared internal function
- ɵɵtextBinding will no longer require an index
- Alters the compiler to stop generating an index argument for the instruction
- Updates tests
- Updates some usage of ɵɵtextBinding in i18n to use the helper function instead
PR Close#30792
To provide some context: The implicit receiver is part of the
parsed Angular template AST. Any property reads in bindings,
interpolations etc. read from a given object (usually the component
instance). In that case there is an _implicit_ receiver which can also
be specified explicitly by just using `this`.
e.g.
```html
<ng-template>{{this.myProperty}}</ng-template>
```
This works as expected in Ivy and View Engine, but breaks in case the
implicit receiver is not used for property reads. For example:
```html
<my-dir [myFn]="greetFn.bind(this)"></my-dir>
```
In that case the `this` will not be properly translated into the generated
template function code because the Ivy compiler currently always treats
the `ctx` variable as the implicit receiver. This is **not correct** and breaks
compatibility with View Engine. Rather we need to ensure that we retrieve
the root context for the standalone implicit receiver similar to how it works
for property reads (as seen in the example above with `this.myProperty`)
Note that this requires some small changes to the `expression_converter`
because we only want to generate the `eenextContent()` instruction if the
implicit receiver is _actually_ used/needed. View Engine determines if that is the case by recursively walking through the converted output AST and
checking for usages of the `o.variable('_co')` variable ([see here][ve_check]). This would work too for Ivy, but involves most likely more code duplication
since templates are isolated in different functions and it another pass
through the output AST for every template expression.
[ve_check]: 0d6c9d36a1/packages/compiler/src/view_compiler/view_compiler.ts (L206-L208)
Resolves FW-1366.
PR Close#30897
- Refactors compiler to stop generating `ɵɵselect(0)` instructions
- Alters template execution to always call the equivalent of `ɵɵselect(0)` before running a template in update mode
- Updates tests to not check for or call `ɵɵselect(0)`.
The goal here is to reduce the size of generated templates
PR Close#30830
Fixes Ivy throwing an error if it runs into an empty property binding on an `ng-template` (e.g. `<ng-template [something]=""></ng-template>`) by not generating an update instruction for it.
Fixes#30801.
This PR resoves FW-1356.
PR Close#30829
- Removes ɵɵelementProperty instruction
- Updates tests that were using it
- NOTE: There is one test under `render3/integration_spec.ts` that is commented out, and needs to be reviewed. Basically, I could not find a good why to test what it was doing, because it was doing things that I am not sure we could generate in an acceptance test.
PR Close#30645
Added a new syntax for projections (`¤` will represent `ng-content` nodes) so that we can treat them specifically.
When we enter an i18n block with the instruction `i18nStart`, a new `delayProjection` variable is set to true to prevent the instruction `projection` from projecting the nodes. Once we reach the `i18nEnd` instruction and encounter a projection in the translation we will project its nodes.
If a projection was removed from a translation, then its nodes won't be projected at all.
The variable `delayProjection` is restored to `false` at the end of `i18nEnd` so that it doesn't stop projections outside of i18n blocks.
FW-1261 #resolve
PR Close#30782
With View engine it was possible to declare multiple projection
definitions and to programmatically project nodes into the slots.
e.g.
```html
<ng-content></ng-content>
<ng-content></ng-content>
```
Using `ViewContainerRef#createComponent` allowed projecting
nodes into one of the projection defs (through index)
This no longer works with Ivy as the `projectionDef` instruction only
retrieves a list of selectors instead of also retrieving entries for
reserved projection slots which appear when using the default
selector multiple times (as seen above).
In order to fix this issue, the Ivy compiler now passes all
projection slots to the `projectionDef` instruction. Meaning that
there can be multiple projection slots with the same wildcard
selector. This allows multi-slot projection as seen in the
example above, and it also allows us to match the multi-slot node
projection order from View Engine (to avoid breaking changes).
It basically ensures that Ivy fully matches the View Engine behavior
except of a very small edge case that has already been discussed
in FW-886 (with the conclusion of working as intended).
Read more here: https://hackmd.io/s/Sy2kQlgTE
PR Close#30561
`i18nAttributes` instructions always occur after the element instruction. This means that we need to treat `i18n-` attributes differently.
By defining a specific `AttributeMarker` we can ensure that we won't trigger directive inputs with untranslated attribute values.
FW-1332 #resolve
PR Close#30402
Changed runtime i18n to define attributes with bindings, or matching directive inputs/outputs as element properties as we are supposed to do in Angular.
This PR fixes the issue where directive inputs wouldn't be trigged.
FW-1315 #resolve
PR Close#30402
The R3TargetBinder "binds" an Angular template AST, computing semantic
information regarding the template and making it accessible.
One of the binding passes previously had a bug, where for the following
template:
<div *ngIf="foo as foo"></div>
which desugars to:
<ng-template ngIf [ngIf]="foo" let-foo="ngIf">
<div></div>
</ng-template>
would have the `[ngIf]` binding processed twice - in both the scope which
contains the `<ng-template>` and the scope inside the template. The bug
arises because during the latter, `foo` is a variable defined by `let-foo`,
and so the R3TargetBinder would incorrectly learn that `foo` inside `[ngIf]`
maps to that variable.
This commit fixes the bug by only processing inputs, outputs, and
templateAttrs from `Template`s in the outer scope.
PR Close#30669
This patch is one of the final patches to refactor the styling algorithm
to be more efficient, performant and less complex.
This patch enables sanitization support for map-based and prop-based
style bindings.
PR Close#30667
This commit makes the static flag on @ViewChild and @ContentChild required.
BREAKING CHANGE:
In Angular version 8, it's required that all @ViewChild and @ContentChild
queries have a 'static' flag specifying whether the query is 'static' or
'dynamic'. The compiler previously sorted queries automatically, but in
8.0 developers are required to explicitly specify which behavior is wanted.
This is a temporary requirement as part of a migration; see
https://angular.io/guide/static-query-migration for more details.
@ViewChildren and @ContentChildren queries are always dynamic, and so are
unaffected.
PR Close#30639
This patch in the second runtime change which refactors how styling
bindings work in Angular. This patch refactors how map-based
`[style]` and `[class]` bindings work using a new algorithm which
is faster and less complex than the former one.
This patch is a follow-up to an earlier refactor which enabled
support for prop-based `[style.name]` and `[class.name]`
bindings (see f03475cac8).
PR Close#30543
Prior to this change we processed binding expression (including bindings with pipes) in i18n attributes before we generate update instruction. As a result, slot offsets for pipeBind instructions were calculated incorrectly. Now we perform binding expression processing when we generate "update block" instructions, so offsets are calculated correctly.
PR Close#30573
There is an encoding issue with using delta `Δ`, where the browser will attempt to detect the file encoding if the character set is not explicitly declared on a `<script/>` tag, and Chrome will find the `Δ` character and decide it is window-1252 encoding, which misinterprets the `Δ` character to be some other character that is not a valid JS identifier character
So back to the frog eyes we go.
```
__
/ɵɵ\
( -- ) - I am ineffable. I am forever.
_/ \_
/ \ / \
== == ==
```
PR Close#30546
This is the first refactor PR designed to change how styling bindings
(i.e. `[style]` and `[class]`) behave in Ivy. Instead of having a heavy
element-by-element context be generated for each element, this new
refactor aims to use a single context for each `tNode` element that is
examined and iterated over when styling values are to be applied to the
element.
This patch brings this new functionality to prop-based bindings such as
`[style.prop]` and `[class.name]`.
PR Close#30469
This is a tentative fix for the error `Cannot write file '/node_modules/@angular/core/core.ngfactory.d.ts' because it would overwrite input file.` that is showing in codefresh windows ci.
PR Close#30482
It's unnecessary for a jasmine_node_test rule to depend on a TypeScript library. This dependency is already satisfied via the 'data' and also having it in 'deps' causes CI flakiness on Windows
PR Close#30482
Currently in Ivy `NgModule` registration happens when the class is declared, however this is inconsistent with ViewEngine and requires extra generated code. These changes remove the generated code for `registerModuleFactory`, pass the id through to the `ngModuleDef` and do the module registration inside `NgModuleFactory.create`.
This PR resolves FW-1285.
PR Close#30244
This is the final patch to migrate the Angular styling code to have a
smaller instruction set in preparation for the runtime refactor. All
styling-related instructions now work both in template and hostBindings
functions and do not use `element` as a prefix for their names:
BEFORE:
elementStyling()
elementStyleProp()
elementClassProp()
elementStyleMap()
elementClassMap()
elementStylingApply()
AFTER:
styling()
styleProp()
classProp()
styleMap()
classMap()
stylingApply()
PR Close#30318
This patch removes all host-specific styling instructions in favor of
using element-level instructions instead. Because of the previous
patches that made sure `select(n)` worked between styling calls, all
host level instructions are not needed anymore. This patch changes each
of those instruction calls to use any of the `elementStyling*`,
`elementStyle*` and `elementClass*` styling instructions instead.
PR Close#30336
George Kalpakas
Olivier Combe
Ayaz Hafiz
crisbeto
Pete Bacon Darwin
Alex Rickabaugh
Paul Gschwendtner
JoostK
Ben Lesh
Alex Eagle
diyews
Matias Niemelä
Kara Erickson
Andrew Kushnir
Alan Agius