Removing for now, since the info is stale, and we need to determine how to adjust the schedule due to the unexpected and significant version 9 delay.
PR Close#34474
On home page, image size set to 400px, which make the page not render
properly on devices below the size of 400px width.
Also, when search results were scrolled, they interfered with the top
nav items. Added border at the top of the search results container so
that the results are not visible under the nav items during scrolling.
PR Close#35098
Footer links did not have enough space between them, so lighthouse was
reporting that tap targets are not appropriately sized. Added the
required 8px space between links.
Also updated the margin of group headers accordingly.
Fixes#34901
PR Close#35098
Because the animation completes in 2000ms, and browser.wait checks
every 100ms, there can be a race condition of if the final state has
actually been reached to read the color. By moving to 2101ms, we ensure
that we cheack after the 2000ms of the animation has completed.
PR Close#35089
https://angular.io/resources needs to be sturctured to be able to navigate to all resources with improved user experience. A lone scroll bar in this page will not help the reader a great deal in exploring the resources
Fixes#33526
PR Close#34756
The golang section was recently added to the deployment guide
but has been reported as returning errors, where it had previously
worked. After discussion and testing with
Stephen Fluin, we are removing this section because of
inconsistency in functionality.
PR Close#34099
This change changes the priority order of static styling.
Current priority:
```
(least priority)
- Static
- Component
- Directives
- Template
- Dynamic Binding
- Component
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
The issue with the above priority is this use case:
```
<div style="color: red;" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
In the above case the directive will win and the resulting color will be `blue`. However a small change of adding interpolation to the example like so. (Style interpolation is coming in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/34202)
```
<div style="color: red; width: {{exp}}px" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
Changes the priority from static binding to interpolated binding which means now the resulting color is `red`. It is very surprising that adding an unrelated interpolation and style can change the `color` which was not changed. To fix that we need to make sure that the static values are associated with priority of the source (directive or template) where they were declared. The new resulting priority is:
```
(least priority)
- Component
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
PR Close#34938
In #35004, we started ignoring yarn's engines check for `yarn install`
in AIO's `test-production.sh` script to fix a failure in the
`aio_monitoring_stable` CI job. (See #35004 for details.)
It turns out that the version of yarn used on the stable branch (1.17.3)
`--ignore-engines` is needed on all yarn commands (including `yarn
run`). Thus, #35004 is not enough to fix the failures.
New example failure: https://circleci.com/gh/angular/angular/604341
This commit turns of the engines check for the whole
`aio_monitoring_stable` CI job to fix the failure and make the job more
robust.
PR Close#35033
There are different `DebugNode`/`DebugElement` implementations (and
associated helper functions) for ViewEngine and Ivy. Additionally, these
classes/functions, which are defined inside the `core` package, are
imported by the `platform-browser` package.
Previously, this code was not tree-shaken as expected in Ivy. #30130
partially addressed the issue, but only for the case where `core` and
`platform-browser` end up in the same closure after webpack's scope
hoisting. In cases where this is not the case, our webpack/terser based
tooling is not capable of tree-shaking it.
This commit fixes the problem, by ensuring that the code retained in Ivy
mode (due to the cross-package import) does not unnecessarily reference
`DebugNode`/`DebugElement`, allowing the code to be tree-shaken away.
This results in a 7.6KB reduction in the size of the main angular.io
bundle.
Jira issue: [FW-1802](https://angular-team.atlassian.net/browse/FW-1802)
PR Close#35003
In #34955, we switched to Node.js v12 on master and 9.0.x. This causes
the `aio_monitoring_job` CI job (which checks out files from the stable
branch; currently 8.2.x) to start failing yarn's engines check (since
the 8.2.x branch expects Node.js version <11).
Example failure: https://circleci.com/gh/angular/angular/602499
Since the job is expected to run with files from both the stable and the
master branches (and since the version of Node.js is not important
here), this commit uses the `--ignore-engines` option to prevent
failures due to Node.js version mismatch.
NOTE:
Typically, the stable and master branch are on the same Node.js version,
because related PRs land on both master and the patch branch. One
exception is during RC periods, when the stable branch is different than
the patch branch. These periods are usually short, but in the case of
9.0.0 the period has lasted several months causing the CI environments
between master and the stable branch to get significantly out-of-sync.
PR Close#35004
earlier p sigly was used to define a paragraph element which was not clear what we want to refer changed it to paragrapg element for better understanding
Fixes#34922
PR Close#34927
This update increases the main bundle by ~0.6KB
payload size snapshot:
456581 Jan 24 22:07 dist/main-es2015.38c39f92eab2fcc8c835.js
541321 Jan 24 22:06 dist/main-es5.38c39f92eab2fcc8c835.js
52487 Jan 24 22:05 dist/polyfills-es2015.b374ef3555a700a97add.js
146193 Jan 24 22:05 dist/polyfills-es5.c7dc569e6c646e42fade.js
2987 Jan 24 22:05 dist/runtime-es2015.29be4028399ae41ba25e.js
2981 Jan 24 22:05 dist/runtime-es5.29be4028399ae41ba25e.js
PR Close#34966
Previously we would write to class/style as strings `element.className` and `element.style.cssText`. Turns out that approach is good for initial render but not good for updates. Updates using this approach are problematic because we have to check to see if there was an out of bound write to style and than perform reconciliation. This also requires the browser to bring up CSS parser which is expensive.
Another problem with old approach is that we had to queue the DOM writes and flush them twice. Once on element advance instruction and once in `hostBindings`. The double flushing is expensive but it also means that a directive can observe that styles are not yet written (they are written after directive executes.)
The new approach uses `element.classList.add/remove` and `element.style.setProperty/removeProperty` API for updates only (it continues to use `element.className` and `element.style.cssText` for initial render as it is cheaper.) The other change is that the styling changes are applied immediately (no queueing). This means that it is the instruction which computes priority. In some circumstances it may result in intermediate writes which are than overwritten with new value. (This should be rare)
Overall this change deletes most of the previous code and replaces it with new simplified implement. The simplification results in code savings.
PR Close#34804
NOTE: This change must be reverted with previous deletes so that it code remains in build-able state.
This change deletes old styling code and replaces it with a simplified styling algorithm.
The mental model for the new algorithm is:
- Create a linked list of styling bindings in the order of priority. All styling bindings ere executed in compiled order and than a linked list of bindings is created in priority order.
- Flush the style bindings at the end of `advance()` instruction. This implies that there are two flush events. One at the end of template `advance` instruction in the template. Second one at the end of `hostBindings` `advance` instruction when processing host bindings (if any).
- Each binding instructions effectively updates the string to represent the string at that location. Because most of the bindings are additive, this is a cheap strategy in most cases. In rare cases the strategy requires removing tokens from the styling up to this point. (We expect that to be rare case)S Because, the bindings are presorted in the order of priority, it is safe to resume the processing of the concatenated string from the last change binding.
PR Close#34616
Oleg Teterin
David Shevitz
Schneider
Misko Hevery
George Kalpakas
JiaLiPassion
Sonu Kapoor
Stephen Fluin
Igor Minar
Kara Erickson
Filipe Silva
Sasha Rudan
ajitsinghkaler
Joey Perrott
Kapunahele Wong
Judy Bogart
陈旭
crisbeto
frosty
Alan Agius
Turtuvshin Byambaa
philonor