The way that `UpgradeAdapter` needs to be setup, you often find that
you must pass a `forwardRef` for an `NgModule.import`. Pre-ivy, this
gets resolved at runtime, but until this is implemented in ivy, we can
workaround it by resolving it in the `UpgradeAdapter` upfront.
This should be backward-compatible since by the time we actually
create the dynamic `NgModule` that has the import, the imported
class should be defined.
PR Close#27132
Make the error messages thrown when instantiating downgraded components,
injectables and modules more descriptive and actionable, also taking
into account incorrect use of the `downgradedModule` field.
PR Close#26217
Currently, calling `downgradeModule()` more than once is not supported.
If one wants to downgrade multiple Angular modules, they can create a
"super-module" that imports all the rest and downgrade that.
This commit adds support for downgrading multiple Angular modules. If
multiple modules are downgraded, then one must explicitly specify the
downgraded module that each downgraded component or injectable belongs
to, when calling `downgradeComponent()` and `downgradeInjectable()`
respectively.
No modification is needed (i.e. there is no need to specify a module for
downgraded components and injectables), if an app is not using
`downgradeModule()` or if there is only one downgraded Angular module.
Fixes#26062
PR Close#26217
This commit adds the ivy-local tag to //packages/router. Since the
router depends on //packages/upgrade, it makes that package
compatible with ngtsc as well.
PR Close#24862
We must always use 1., 2. etc, to indicate ordered lists, even for sub-lists.
We can change the sublist to display as a., b. etc, via CSS.
PR Close#18487
PR Close#18487
All errors for existing fields have been detected and suppressed with a
`!` assertion.
Issue/24571 is tracking proper clean up of those instances.
One-line change required in ivy/compilation.ts, because it appears that
the new syntax causes tsickle emitted node to no longer track their
original sourceFiles.
PR Close#24572
Changes would not propagate to a value in downgraded component in case you had two-way binding and listening to a value-change, e.g. [(value)]="value" (value-change)="fetch()"
Closes#22734
PR Close#22772
Previously, when a downgraded component was destroyed in a way that did
not trigger the `$destroy` event on the element (e.g. when a parent
element was removed from the DOM by Angular, not AngularJS), the
`ComponentRef` was not destroyed and unregistered.
This commit fixes it by listening for the `$destroy` event on both the
element and the scope.
Fixes#22392
PR Close#22400
The function provided by `ngUpgrade` as `parentBoundTranscludeFn` when
upgrading a component with transclusion, will break in AngularJS v1.5.8+
if no transclusion content is provided. The reason is that AngularJS
will try to destroy the transclusion scope (which would not be needed
any more). But since the transcluded content comes from Angular, not
AngularJS, there is no transclusion scope to destroy.
This commit fixes it by providing a dummy scope object with a no-op
`$destroy()` method.
Fixes#22175
PR Close#22167
Previously, having a `=` binding on an upgraded components would result
in setting the corresponding property to an EventEmitter function. This
should only happen for `&` bindings.
This commit rstrores the correct behavior.
Note:
The issue was only present in the dynamic version of `ngUpgrade`. The
static version worked as expected.
The error did not show up in tests, because in AngularJS v1.5.x a
function would be serialized to an empty string in interpolations, thus
making them indistinguishable from uninitialized properties (in the
view). The serialization behavior changed in AngularJS v1.6.x, making
the errors visible.
PR Close#22167
Pete Bacon Darwin
George Kalpakas
Andy Blatecky
Jason Bedard
Jason Aden
Alex Rickabaugh
Kapunahele Wong
Rado Kirov
Lucas Sloan
swseverance
Nathan Friend
Shannon Dunn
Domas Trijonis
vsavkin
Olivier Combe
Alex Eagle
Victor Berchet