Fixes all TypeScript failures caused by enabling the `--strict`
flag for test source files. We also want to enable the strict
options for tests as the strictness enforcement improves the
overall codehealth, unveiled common issues and additionally it
allows us to enable `strict` in the `tsconfig.json` that is picked
up by IDE's.
PR Close#30993
As part of FW-1265, the `@angular/core` package is made compatible
with the TypeScript `--strict` flag. This already unveiled a few bugs,
so the strictness flag seems to help with increasing the overall code health.
Read more about the strict flag [here](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/compiler-options.html)
PR Close#30993
Currently we reuse the same instruction both for regular property bindings and property bindings on the `host`. The only difference between the two is that when it's on the host we shouldn't support inputs. We have an optional parameter called `nativeOnly` which is used to differentiate the two, however since `nativeOnly` is preceeded by another optional parameter (`sanitizer`), we have to generate two extra parameters for each host property bindings every time (e.g. `property('someProp', 'someValue', null, true)`).
These changes add a new instruction called `hostProperty` which avoids the need for the two parameters by removing `nativeOnly` which is always set and it allows us to omit `sanitizer` when it isn't being used.
These changes also remove the `nativeOnly` parameter from the `updateSyntheticHostBinding` instruction, because it's only generated for host elements which means that we can assume that its value will always be `true`.
PR Close#31550
The Angular runtime frequently calls into user code (for example, when
writing to a property binding). Since user code can throw errors, calls to
it are frequently wrapped in a try-finally block. In Ivy, the following
pattern is common:
```typescript
enterView();
try {
callUserCode();
} finally {
leaveView();
}
```
This has a significant problem, however: `leaveView` has a side effect: it
calls any pending lifecycle hooks that might've been scheduled during the
current round of change detection. Generally it's a bad idea to run
lifecycle hooks after the application has crashed. The application is in an
inconsistent state - directives may not be instantiated fully, queries may
not be resolved, bindings may not have been applied, etc. Invariants that
the app code relies upon may not hold. Further crashes or broken behavior
are likely.
Frequently, lifecycle hooks are used to make assertions about these
invariants. When these assertions fail, they will throw and "swallow" the
original error, making debugging of the problem much more difficult.
This commit modifies `leaveView` to understand whether the application is
currently crashing, via a parameter `safeToRunHooks`. This parameter is set
by modifying the above pattern:
```typescript
enterView();
let safeToRunHooks = false;
try {
callUserCode();
safeToRunHooks = true;
} finally {
leaveView(..., safeToRunHooks);
}
```
If `callUserCode` crashes, then `safeToRunHooks` will never be set to `true`
and `leaveView` won't call any further user code. The original error will
then propagate back up the stack and be reported correctly. A test is added
to verify this behavior.
PR Close#31244
The function `bind` has been internalized wherever it was needed, this PR makes sure that it is no longer publicly exported.
FW-1385 #resolve
PR Close#31131
- Splits core functionality off into a shared internal function
- ɵɵtextBinding will no longer require an index
- Alters the compiler to stop generating an index argument for the instruction
- Updates tests
- Updates some usage of ɵɵtextBinding in i18n to use the helper function instead
PR Close#30792
Factory functions written by the compiler optionally allow an explicit type
to be passed. If called with this type, an instance of the given type will
be created instead of the type for which the factory was generated. This is
used to power inheritance of Angular types, as if the constructor of a class
is inherited from its superclass, then the factory function of the
superclass must be used (it has all the DI info) to construct an instance of
the derived class.
This commit adjusts typings in a few places to allow factory functions to be
called with this extra type parameter.
PR Close#30855
The compiler generates a 'token' field when it emits an ngInjectableDef,
but this field was not required by defineInjectable or the InjectableDef
interface, nor was it added by InjectionToken.
This commit makes 'token' required and adds it where missing.
PR Close#30855
- Refactors compiler to stop generating `ɵɵselect(0)` instructions
- Alters template execution to always call the equivalent of `ɵɵselect(0)` before running a template in update mode
- Updates tests to not check for or call `ɵɵselect(0)`.
The goal here is to reduce the size of generated templates
PR Close#30830
- Removes ɵɵelementProperty instruction
- Updates tests that were using it
- NOTE: There is one test under `render3/integration_spec.ts` that is commented out, and needs to be reviewed. Basically, I could not find a good why to test what it was doing, because it was doing things that I am not sure we could generate in an acceptance test.
PR Close#30645
Added a new syntax for projections (`¤` will represent `ng-content` nodes) so that we can treat them specifically.
When we enter an i18n block with the instruction `i18nStart`, a new `delayProjection` variable is set to true to prevent the instruction `projection` from projecting the nodes. Once we reach the `i18nEnd` instruction and encounter a projection in the translation we will project its nodes.
If a projection was removed from a translation, then its nodes won't be projected at all.
The variable `delayProjection` is restored to `false` at the end of `i18nEnd` so that it doesn't stop projections outside of i18n blocks.
FW-1261 #resolve
PR Close#30782
With View engine it was possible to declare multiple projection
definitions and to programmatically project nodes into the slots.
e.g.
```html
<ng-content></ng-content>
<ng-content></ng-content>
```
Using `ViewContainerRef#createComponent` allowed projecting
nodes into one of the projection defs (through index)
This no longer works with Ivy as the `projectionDef` instruction only
retrieves a list of selectors instead of also retrieving entries for
reserved projection slots which appear when using the default
selector multiple times (as seen above).
In order to fix this issue, the Ivy compiler now passes all
projection slots to the `projectionDef` instruction. Meaning that
there can be multiple projection slots with the same wildcard
selector. This allows multi-slot projection as seen in the
example above, and it also allows us to match the multi-slot node
projection order from View Engine (to avoid breaking changes).
It basically ensures that Ivy fully matches the View Engine behavior
except of a very small edge case that has already been discussed
in FW-886 (with the conclusion of working as intended).
Read more here: https://hackmd.io/s/Sy2kQlgTE
PR Close#30561
This patch is one of the final patches to refactor the styling algorithm
to be more efficient, performant and less complex.
This patch enables sanitization support for map-based and prop-based
style bindings.
PR Close#30667
This commit makes the static flag on @ViewChild and @ContentChild required.
BREAKING CHANGE:
In Angular version 8, it's required that all @ViewChild and @ContentChild
queries have a 'static' flag specifying whether the query is 'static' or
'dynamic'. The compiler previously sorted queries automatically, but in
8.0 developers are required to explicitly specify which behavior is wanted.
This is a temporary requirement as part of a migration; see
https://angular.io/guide/static-query-migration for more details.
@ViewChildren and @ContentChildren queries are always dynamic, and so are
unaffected.
PR Close#30639
This patch in the second runtime change which refactors how styling
bindings work in Angular. This patch refactors how map-based
`[style]` and `[class]` bindings work using a new algorithm which
is faster and less complex than the former one.
This patch is a follow-up to an earlier refactor which enabled
support for prop-based `[style.name]` and `[class.name]`
bindings (see f03475cac8).
PR Close#30543
Depending on which placeholders the translation uses, there are some legitimate cases where we might not use all placeholder replacements in `i18nPostprocess`. For example if some of the placeholders of the original messages have been removed in the translation.
FW-1312 #resolve
PR Close#30632
There is an encoding issue with using delta `Δ`, where the browser will attempt to detect the file encoding if the character set is not explicitly declared on a `<script/>` tag, and Chrome will find the `Δ` character and decide it is window-1252 encoding, which misinterprets the `Δ` character to be some other character that is not a valid JS identifier character
So back to the frog eyes we go.
```
__
/ɵɵ\
( -- ) - I am ineffable. I am forever.
_/ \_
/ \ / \
== == ==
```
PR Close#30546
Moves all manual render3 view_container_ref tests that use property
bindings to acceptance tests with TestBed.
Two issues surfaced and refer to a difference between Ivy and View
engine:
* Multi-slot projection is not working with Ivy: FW-1331
* ViewContainerRef throws if index is invalid while View Engine clamped index: FW-1330
PR Close#30488
This is the first refactor PR designed to change how styling bindings
(i.e. `[style]` and `[class]`) behave in Ivy. Instead of having a heavy
element-by-element context be generated for each element, this new
refactor aims to use a single context for each `tNode` element that is
examined and iterated over when styling values are to be applied to the
element.
This patch brings this new functionality to prop-based bindings such as
`[style.prop]` and `[class.name]`.
PR Close#30469
Moves most of the tests from `render3/integration_spec` into `acceptance`. Note that there are still a handful of tests left in render3, because we don't have a way of moving all of them to go through `TestBed` since they either have r3-specific assertions or we don't have access to the same APIs as the raw instructions.
PR Close#30461
Ports render3 onDestroy tests over to be acceptance tests. Removes old render3 tests if possible.
Note the onlyInIvy test for one area where Ivy has a different behavior than ViewEngine
PR Close#30445
- Adds inheritance tests for many combinations of directive, component and bare class inheritance
- Adds tests that are failing in ivy, but should work, marks them with `xit` and a TODO.
- Removes render3 unit tests that cover the same things.
PR Close#30442
- Moves template ref tests from render3 unit tests to acceptance tests.
- Marks tests testing ivy specific changes as `onlyInIvy`.
- Deletes old render3 unit tests that are no longer necessary
PR Close#30443
Preserve compatibility with rollup_bundle rule.
Add missing npm dependencies, which are now enforced by the strict_deps plugin in tsc_wrapped
PR Close#30370
Moves most of the r3 change detection tests into `acceptance`. Notes:
* A handful of tests weren't migrated, because they were testing an API that isn't exposed publicly yet.
* The `should throw if bindings in children of current view have changed` and `should NOT throw if bindings in ancestors of current view have changed` tests were removed, because there's not nice way of hitting the same code path with `TestBed` and doing the same assertion as with the raw instructions. I'm open to ideas on how we could do them.
* There were a few tests that assert that the `innerHTML` looks in a particular way. I've switched them to use `textContent`, because Ivy and ViewEngine produce slightly different DOM. The tests were only checking whether the text has changed anyway.
PR Close#30425
Moves all manual render3 property binding tests to
TestBed acceptance tests. Unfortunately three property
binding tests could not be migrated as these rely on
manual Ivy template code that is not supported within
TestBed. These can be revisited as discussed in the
framework team meeting.
PR Close#30426
Moves all manual render3 tests which are located within the
`renderer_factory_spec.ts` file to acceptance tests. A few tests
that use Ivy-specific logic which is not replicable with `TestBed`
remain in the render3 folder (e.g. using `renderTemplate`)
Additionally migrated tests that assert the lifecycles of the
renderer_factory are set to *ivy only* as the lifecycle seems
to be different in Ivy. Tracked with: FW-1320
PR Close#30435
- Moves tests related to the pureFunction instructions from render3 to acceptance tests
- Leaves behind one test for in-template javascript that is not supported syntax yet
PR Close#30406
Moves over the tests from `pipe_spec` into `acceptance`. Note that the two `WrappedValue` tests haven't been moved over, because impure pipes always throw "changed after checked" errors in `TestBed`. This seems to be consistent with ViewEngine.
PR Close#30389
Paul Gschwendtner
crisbeto
Alex Rickabaugh
Olivier Combe
Ben Lesh
Miško Hevery
Matias Niemelä
Kara Erickson
Pawel Kozlowski
cexbrayat
Alex Eagle