This patch ensures that if a list of nodes (that contain
animation triggers) are moved around then they will retain their
trigger-value state when animated again at a later point.
PR Close#24238
`NgForOf` used to implement `OnChanges` and than use
`ngOnChanges` callback to detect when `ngForOf` binding
changed to update the differ. We now do the checking
manually which puts less pressure on the runtime to do
the bookkeeping and should result in minor perf improvement.
PR Close#23378
After #24113 there is 2 `TNode` in those tests:
- 1 for the host,
- 1 for the text node.
The PR #23924 status was green because it branched off master before #24113 was
merged in.
PR Close#24208
Closure Compiler in some configurations complains about duplicate
imports. This change replaces the export-with-import with an export of
the imported symbol.
closes#23993
PR Close#24203
This PR tackles a simple case where ViewRef definition point (<ng-template>) is the
same as the insertion point (ViewContainerRef requested on the said <ng-template>).
For this particular case we can assume that we know a container into which a given
view will be inserted when a view is created. This is not true fall all the possible
cases so follow-up PR will be needed to extend this basic implementation.
PR Close#24179
This commit builds out enough of the JIT compiler to render
//packages/core/test/bundling/todo, and allows the tests to run in
JIT mode.
To play with the app, run:
bazel run --define=compile=jit //packages/core/test/bundling/todo:prodserver
PR Close#24138
In ngIvy directives matching (determining which directives are active based
on a CSS seletor) happens at runtime. This means that runtime needs to have
enough context to match directives. This PR takes care of cases where a directive's
selector should match bindings (ex. [foo]="exp") and event handlers (ex. (out)="do()").
In the mentioned cases we need to have binding / output "attributes" for directive's
CSS selector matching purposes. At the same time those are not regular attributes and
as such should not be reflected in the DOM.
Closes#23706
PR Close#23991
Allows to write:
const fixture = TestBed
.overridePipe(DisplayNamePipe, { set: { pure: false } })
.createComponent(MenuComponent);
when you only want to set the `pure` metadata,
instead of currently:
const fixture = TestBed
.overridePipe(DisplayNamePipe, { set: { name: 'displayName', pure: false } })
.createComponent(MenuComponent);
which forces you to redefine the name of the pipe even if it is useless.
Fixes#24102
PR Close#24103
Bazel has a restriction that a single output (eg. a compiled version of
//packages/common) can only be produced by a single rule. This precludes
the Angular repo from having multiple rules that build the same code. And
the complexity of having a single rule produce multiple outputs (eg. an
ngc-compiled version of //packages/common and an Ivy-enabled version) is
too high.
Additionally, the Angular repo has lots of existing tests which could be
executed as-is under Ivy. Such testing is very valuable, and it would be
nice to share not only the code, but the dependency graph / build config
as well.
Thus, this change introduces a --define flag 'compile' with three potential
values. When --define=compile=X is set, the entire build system runs in a
particular mode - the behavior of all existing targets is controlled by
the flag. This allows us to reuse our entire build structure for testing
in a variety of different manners. The flag has three possible settings:
* legacy (the default): the traditional View Engine (ngc) build
* local: runs the prototype ngtsc compiler, which does not rely on global
analysis
* jit: runs ngtsc in a mode which executes tsickle, but excludes the
Angular related transforms, which approximates the behavior of plain
tsc. This allows the main packages such as common to be tested with
the JIT compiler.
Additionally, the ivy_ng_module() rule still exists and runs ngc in a mode
where Ivy-compiled output is produced from global analysis information, as
a stopgap while ngtsc is being developed.
PR Close#24056
Short-circuitable expressions (using ternary & binary operators) could not use
the regular binding mechanism as it relies on the bindings being checked every
single time - the index is incremented as part of checking the bindings.
Then for pure function kind of bindings we use a different mechanism with a
fixed index. As such short circuiting a binding check does not mess with the
expected binding index.
Note that all pure function bindings are handled the same wether or not they
actually are short-circuitable. This allows to keep the compiler and compiled
code simple - and there is no runtime perf cost anyway.
PR Close#24039