Commit Graph

106 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Victor Berchet a755b715ed feat(router): introduce `ParamMap` to access parameters
The Router use the type `Params` for all of:
- position parameters,
- matrix parameters,
- query parameters.

`Params` is defined as follow `type Params = {[key: string]: any}`

Because parameters can either have single or multiple values, the type should
actually be `type Params = {[key: string]: string | string[]}`.

The client code often assumes that parameters have single values, as in the
following exemple:

```
class MyComponent {
sessionId: Observable<string>;

constructor(private route: ActivatedRoute) {}

ngOnInit() {
    this.sessionId = this.route
      .queryParams
      .map(params => params['session_id'] || 'None');
}
}

```

The problem here is that `params['session_id']` could be `string` or `string[]`
but the error is not caught at build time because of the `any` type.

Fixing the type as describe above would break the build because `sessionId`
would becomes an `Observable<string | string[]>`.

However the client code knows if it expects a single or multiple values. By
using the new `ParamMap` interface the user code can decide when it needs a
single value (calling `ParamMap.get(): string`) or multiple values (calling
`ParamMap.getAll(): string[]`).

The above exemple should be rewritten as:

```
class MyComponent {
sessionId: Observable<string>;

constructor(private route: ActivatedRoute) {}

ngOnInit() {
    this.sessionId = this.route
      .queryParamMap
      .map(paramMap => paramMap.get('session_id') || 'None');
}
}

```

Added APIs:
- `interface ParamMap`,
- `ActivatedRoute.paramMap: ParamMap`,
- `ActivatedRoute.queryParamMap: ParamMap`,
- `ActivatedRouteSnapshot.paramMap: ParamMap`,
- `ActivatedRouteSnapshot.queryParamMap: ParamMap`,
- `UrlSegment.parameterMap: ParamMap`
2017-03-20 09:19:32 -07:00
Victor Berchet a9d5de0e56 refactor(router): misc minor updates 2017-03-20 09:19:32 -07:00
Victor Berchet 029d0f25e5 fix(router): fix query parameters with multiple values (#15129)
fixes #14796
2017-03-15 15:27:19 -07:00
Victor Berchet 13686bb518 fix: element injector vs module injector (#15044)
fixes #12869
fixes #12889
fixes #13885
fixes #13870

Before this change there was a single injector tree.
Now we have 2 injector trees, one for the modules and one for the components.
This fixes lazy loading modules.

See the design docs for details:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OEUIwc-s69l1o97K0wBd_-Lth5BBxir1KuCRWklTlI4

BREAKING CHANGES

`ComponentFactory.create()` takes an extra optional `NgModuleRef` parameter.
No change should be required in user code as the correct module will be used
when none is provided

DEPRECATIONS

The following methods were used internally and are no more required:
- `RouterOutlet.locationFactoryResolver`
- `RouterOutlet.locationInjector`
2017-03-14 16:26:17 -07:00
Tobias Bosch 2c5a671341 fix: don't instantiate providers with ngOnDestroy eagerly. (#15070)
BREAKING CHANGE:

Perviously, any provider that had an ngOnDestroy lifecycle hook would be created eagerly.

Now, only classes that are annotated with @Component, @Directive, @Pipe, @NgModule are eager. Providers only become eager if they are either directly or transitively injected into one of the above.

This also makes all `useValue` providers eager, which
should have no observable impact other than code size.

EXPECTED IMPACT:
Making providers eager was an incorrect behavior and never documented.
Also, providers that are used by a directive / pipe / ngModule stay eager.
So the impact should be rather small.

Fixes #14552
2017-03-14 14:32:26 -07:00
Jason Aden 3e51a19983 refactor: move angular source to /packages rather than modules/@angular 2017-03-08 16:29:27 -08:00