E.g. in the following scenario,
`some-directive` should not be able to inject
any view provider that `my-comp-with-view-providers`
declares.
```
<my-comp-with-view-providers>
<div some-directive></div>
</my-comp-with-view-providers>
```
Fixes#7315
BREAKING CHANGES:
Previously multiple template bindings on one element
(ex. `<div *ngIf='..' *ngFor='...'>`) were allowed but most of the time
were leading to undesired result. It is possible that a small number
of applications will see template parse errors that shuld be fixed by
nesting elements or using `<template>` tags explicitly.
Closes#9462
Fix how the compiler checks for recursive components by also considering
component descendants. Previously, it only checked if the current
component was evaluated previously. This failed in certain cases of
mutually recursive components, causing `createAsync` in tests to not
resolve.
closes [7084](https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/7084)
After splitting the facades into multiple modules,
enabling prod mode for code had no effect for the compiler.
Also in a change between RC1 and RC2 we created the `CompilerConfig`
via a provider with `useValue` and not via a `useFactory`, which reads
the prod mode too early.
Closes#9318Closes#8508Closes#9318
This lets users continue using runtime-sideeffect Decorators if they choose,
only down-leveling the marked ones to Annotations.
Also remove the "skipTemplateCodegen" option, which is no longer needed
since Angular compiles with tsc-wrapped rather than ngc. The former doesn't
include any codegen.
`<ng-container>` is a logical container that can be used to group nodes but is not rendered in the DOM tree as a node.
`<ng-container>` is rendered as an HTML comment.
* feat(I18nExtractor): Add file paths to error messages
relates to #9071
* feat(i18n): allow i18n start comments without meaning
* refactor(i18n): cleanup
* test(HtmlParser): Add depth to expansion forms
Previously these symbols were exposed via platform-browser-dynamic, then we merged then into platform-browser
thinking that tools would know how to shake off the compiler and other dynamic bits not used with the offline
compilation flow. This turned out to be wrong as both webpack and rollup don't have good enough tree-shaking
capabilities to do this today. We think that in the future we'll be able to merge these two entry points into
one, but we need to give tooling some time before we can do it. In the meantime the reintroduction of the -dynamic
package point allows us to separate the compiler dependencies from the rest of the framework.
This change undoes the previous breaking change that removed the platform-browser-dynamic package.
This aligns the configuration of platform pipes / directives with offline compilation.
BREAKING CHANGE:
- `PLATFORM_PIPES` and `PLATFORM_DIRECTIVES` now are fields on `CompilerConfig`.
Instead of providing a binding to these tokens, provide a binding for `CompilerConfig` instead.
Julie Ralph
Tobias Bosch
Pawel Kozlowski
ScottSWu
Victor Berchet
tycho01
Rob Wormald
Matias Niemelä
Alex Eagle
Igor Minar
Wassim Chegham