Recently ng-packagr was updated to include a transform that used to be
done in tsickle (https://github.com/ng-packagr/ng-packagr/pull/1401),
where only constructor parameter decorators are emitted in tsickle's
format, not any of the other decorators.
ngcc used to extract decorators from only a single format, so once it
saw the `ctorParameters` static property it assumed the library is using
the tsickle format. Therefore, none of the `__decorate` calls were
considered. This resulted in missing decorator information, preventing
proper processing of a package.
This commit changes how decorators are extracted by always looking at
both the static properties and the `__decorate` calls, merging these
sources appropriately.
Resolves FW-1573
PR Close#32901
In ngcc's reflection host for UMD and CommonJS bundles, custom logic is
present to resolve import details of an identifier. However, this custom
logic is unable to resolve an import for an identifier inside of
declaration files, as such files use the regular ESM import syntax.
As a consequence of this limitation, ngtsc is unable to resolve
`ModuleWithProviders` imports that are declared in an external library.
In that situation, ngtsc determines the type of the actual `NgModule`
that is imported, by looking in the library's declaration files for the
generic type argument on `ModuleWithProviders`. In this process, ngtsc
resolves the import for the `ModuleWithProviders` identifier to verify
that it is indeed the `ModuleWithProviders` type from `@angular/core`.
So, when the UMD reflection host was in use this resolution would fail,
therefore no `NgModule` type could be detected.
This commit fixes the bug by using the regular import resolution logic
in addition to the custom resolution logic that is required for UMD
and CommonJS bundles.
Fixes#31791
PR Close#32619
In ESM2015 bundles, a class with decorators may be emitted as follows:
```javascript
var MyClass_1;
let MyClass = MyClass_1 = class MyClass {};
MyClass.decorators = [/* here be decorators */];
```
Such a class has two declarations: the publicly visible `let MyClass`
and the implementation `class MyClass {}` node. In #32539 a refactoring
took place to handle such classes more consistently, however the logic
to find static properties was mistakenly kept identical to its broken
state before the refactor, by looking for static properties on the
implementation symbol (the one for `class MyClass {}`) whereas the
static properties need to be obtained from the symbol corresponding with
the `let MyClass` declaration, as that is where the `decorators`
property is assigned to in the example above.
This commit fixes the behavior by looking for static properties on the
public declaration symbol. This fixes an issue where decorators were not
found for classes that do in fact have decorators, therefore preventing
the classes from being compiled for Ivy.
Fixes#31791
PR Close#32619
In ngcc's reflection hosts for compiled JS bundles, such as ESM2015,
special care needs to be taken for classes as there may be an outer
declaration (referred to as "declaration") and an inner declaration
(referred to as "implementation") for a given class. Therefore, there
will also be two `ts.Symbol`s bound per class, and ngcc needs to switch
between those declarations and symbols depending on where certain
information can be found.
Prior to this commit, the `NgccReflectionHost` interface had methods
`getClassSymbol` and `findClassSymbols` that would return a `ts.Symbol`.
These class symbols would be used to kick off compilation of components
using ngtsc, so it is important for these symbols to correspond with the
publicly visible outer declaration of the class. However, the ESM2015
reflection host used to return the `ts.Symbol` for the inner
declaration, if the class was declared as follows:
```javascript
var MyClass = class MyClass {};
```
For the above code, `Esm2015ReflectionHost.getClassSymbol` would return
the `ts.Symbol` corresponding with the `class MyClass {}` declaration,
whereas it should have corresponded with the `var MyClass` declaration.
As a consequence, no `NgModule` could be resolved for the component, so
no components/directives would be in scope for the component. This
resulted in errors during runtime.
This commit resolves the issue by introducing a `NgccClassSymbol` that
contains references to both the outer and inner `ts.Symbol`, instead of
just a single `ts.Symbol`. This avoids the unclarity of whether a
`ts.Symbol` corresponds with the outer or inner declaration.
More details can be found here: https://hackmd.io/7nkgWOFWQlSRAuIW_8KPPwFixes#32078
Closes FW-1507
PR Close#32539
ngcc needs to solve a unique problem when compiling typings for an
entrypoint: it must resolve a declaration within a .js file to its
representation in a .d.ts file. Since such .d.ts files can be used in deep
imports without ever being referenced from the "root" .d.ts, it's not enough
to simply match exported types to the root .d.ts. ngcc must build an index
of all .d.ts files.
Previously, this operation had a bug: it scanned all .d.ts files in the
.d.ts program, not only those within the package. Thus, if a class in the
program happened to share a name with a class exported from a dependency's
.d.ts, ngcc might accidentally modify the wrong .d.ts file, causing a
variety of issues downstream.
To fix this issue, ngcc's .d.ts scanner now limits the .d.ts files it
indexes to only those declared in the current package.
PR Close#32129
One of the compiler's tasks is to enumerate the exports of a given ES
module. This can happen for example to resolve `foo.bar` where `foo` is a
namespace import:
```typescript
import * as foo from './foo';
@NgModule({
directives: [foo.DIRECTIVES],
})
```
In this case, the compiler must enumerate the exports of `foo.ts` in order
to evaluate the expression `foo.DIRECTIVES`.
When this operation occurs under ngcc, it must deal with the different
module formats and types of exports that occur. In commonjs code, a problem
arises when certain exports are downleveled.
```typescript
export const DIRECTIVES = [
FooDir,
BarDir,
];
```
can be downleveled to:
```javascript
exports.DIRECTIVES = [
FooDir,
BarDir,
```
Previously, ngtsc and ngcc expected that any export would have an associated
`ts.Declaration` node. `export class`, `export function`, etc. all retain
`ts.Declaration`s even when downleveled. But the `export const` construct
above does not. Therefore, ngcc would not detect `DIRECTIVES` as an export
of `foo.ts`, and the evaluation of `foo.DIRECTIVES` would therefore fail.
To solve this problem, the core concept of an exported `Declaration`
according to the `ReflectionHost` API is split into a `ConcreteDeclaration`
which has a `ts.Declaration`, and an `InlineDeclaration` which instead has
a `ts.Expression`. Differentiating between these allows ngcc to return an
`InlineDeclaration` for `DIRECTIVES` and correctly keep track of this
export.
PR Close#32129
In #31426 a fix was implemented to render namespaced decorator imports
correctly, however it turns out that the fix only worked when decorator
information was extracted from static properties, not when using
`__decorate` calls.
This commit fixes the issue by creating the decorator metadata with the
full decorator expression, instead of only its name.
Closes#31394
PR Close#31614
An identifier may become repeated when bundling multiple source files
into a single bundle, so bundlers have a strategy of suffixing non-unique
identifiers with a suffix like $2. Since ngcc operates on such bundles,
it needs to process potentially suffixed identifiers in their canonical
form without the suffix. The "ngx-pagination" package was previously not
compiled fully, as most decorators were not recognized.
This commit ensures that identifiers are first canonicalized by removing
the suffix, such that they are properly recognized and processed by ngcc.
Fixes#31540
PR Close#31614
Any decorator information present in TypeScript is emitted into the
generated JavaScript sources by means of `__decorate` call. This call
contains both the decorators as they existed in the original source
code, together with calls to `tslib` helpers that convey additional
information on e.g. type information and parameter decorators. These
different kinds of decorator calls were not previously distinguished on
their own, but instead all treated as `Decorator` by themselves. The
"decorators" that were actually `tslib` helper calls were conveniently
filtered out because they were not imported from `@angular/core`, a
characteristic that ngcc uses to drop certain decorators.
Note that this posed an inconsistency in ngcc when it processes
`@angular/core`'s UMD bundle, as the `tslib` helper functions have been
inlined in said bundle. Because of the inlining, the `tslib` helpers
appear to be from `@angular/core`, so ngcc would fail to drop those
apparent "decorators". This inconsistency does not currently cause any
issues, as ngtsc is specifically looking for decorators based on their
name and any remaining decorators are simply ignored.
This commit rewrites the decorator analysis of a class to occur all in a
single phase, instead of all throughout the `ReflectionHost`. This
allows to categorize the various decorate calls in a single sweep,
instead of constantly needing to filter out undesired decorate calls on
the go. As an added benefit, the computed decorator information is now
cached per class, such that subsequent reflection queries that need
decorator information can reuse the cached info.
PR Close#31614
The ngcc tool adds namespaced imports to files when compiling. The ngtsc
tooling was not processing types correctly when they were imported via
such namespaces. For example:
```
export declare class SomeModule {
static withOptions(...): ModuleWithProviders<ɵngcc1.BaseModule>;
```
In this case the `BaseModule` was being incorrectly attributed to coming
from the current module rather than the imported module, represented by
`ɵngcc1`.
Fixes#31342
PR Close#31367
Some formats of CommonJS put the decorator helper calls
outside the class IIFE as statements on the top level of the
source file.
This commit adds support to the `CommonJSReflectionHost`
for this format.
PR Close#31335
Previously we expected the constructor parameter `decorators`
property to be an array wrapped in a function. Now we also support
an array not wrapped in a function.
PR Close#30591
To improve cross platform support, all file access (and path manipulation)
is now done through a well known interface (`FileSystem`).
For testing a number of `MockFileSystem` implementations are provided.
These provide an in-memory file-system which emulates operating systems
like OS/X, Unix and Windows.
The current file system is always available via the static method,
`FileSystem.getFileSystem()`. This is also used by a number of static
methods on `AbsoluteFsPath` and `PathSegment`, to avoid having to pass
`FileSystem` objects around all the time. The result of this is that one
must be careful to ensure that the file-system has been initialized before
using any of these static methods. To prevent this happening accidentally
the current file system always starts out as an instance of `InvalidFileSystem`,
which will throw an error if any of its methods are called.
You can set the current file-system by calling `FileSystem.setFileSystem()`.
During testing you can call the helper function `initMockFileSystem(os)`
which takes a string name of the OS to emulate, and will also monkey-patch
aspects of the TypeScript library to ensure that TS is also using the
current file-system.
Finally there is the `NgtscCompilerHost` to be used for any TypeScript
compilation, which uses a given file-system.
All tests that interact with the file-system should be tested against each
of the mock file-systems. A series of helpers have been provided to support
such tests:
* `runInEachFileSystem()` - wrap your tests in this helper to run all the
wrapped tests in each of the mock file-systems.
* `addTestFilesToFileSystem()` - use this to add files and their contents
to the mock file system for testing.
* `loadTestFilesFromDisk()` - use this to load a mirror image of files on
disk into the in-memory mock file-system.
* `loadFakeCore()` - use this to load a fake version of `@angular/core`
into the mock file-system.
All ngcc and ngtsc source and tests now use this virtual file-system setup.
PR Close#30921
Packages that have been compiled using an older version of TypeScript
can have their decorators at the top-level of the ES5 bundles, instead
of inside the IIFE that is emitted for the class. Before this change,
ngcc only took static property assignments inside the IIFE into account,
therefore missing the decorators that were assigned at the top-level.
This commit extends the ES5 host to look for static properties in two
places. Testcases for all bundle formats that contain ES5 have been added
to ensure that this works in the various flavours.
A patch is included to support UMD bundles. The UMD factory affects how
TypeScripts binds the static properties to symbols, see the docblock of
the patch function for more details.
PR Close#30795
9d9c9e43e5 has been created a few days ago
and wasn't rebased on top of recent changes that introduces a commonjs host.
This means that tests for the commonjs host haven't been updated to work with
the changes from from #30492 and now fail in `master`.
PR Close#30967
Currently undecorated classes are intentionally not processed
with ngcc. This is causing unexpected behavior because decorator
handlers such as `base_def.ts` are specifically interested in class
definitions without top-level decorators, so that the base definition
can be generated if there are Angular-specific class members.
In order to ensure that undecorated base-classes work as expected
with Ivy, we need to run the decorator handlers for all top-level
class declarations (not only for those with decorators). This is similar
to when `ngtsc` runs decorator handlers when analyzing source-files.
Resolves FW-1355. Fixes https://github.com/angular/components/issues/16178
PR Close#30821
The usage of array spread syntax in source code may be downleveled to a
call to TypeScript's `__spread` helper function from `tslib`, depending
on the options `downlevelIteration` and `emitHelpers`. This proves
problematic for ngcc when it is processing ES5 formats, as the static
evaluator won't be able to interpret those calls.
A custom foreign function resolver is not sufficient in this case, as
`tslib` may be emitted into the library code itself. In that case, a
helper function can be resolved to an actual function with body, such
that it won't be considered as foreign function. Instead, a reflection
host can now indicate that the definition of a function corresponds with
a certain TypeScript helper, such that it becomes statically evaluable
in ngtsc.
Resolves#30299
PR Close#30492
Previously these fake files were full TypeScript source
files (`.ts`) but this is not necessary as we only need the
typings not the implementation.
PR Close#25445
This commit introduces a new interface, which abstracts access
to the underlying `FileSystem`. There is initially one concrete
implementation, `NodeJsFileSystem`, which is simply wrapping the
`fs` library of NodeJs.
Going forward, we can provide a `MockFileSystem` for test, which
should allow us to stop using `mock-fs` for most of the unit tests.
We could also implement a `CachedFileSystem` that may improve the
performance of ngcc.
PR Close#29643
In ES2015, classes could have been emitted as a variable declaration
initialized with a class expression. In certain situations, an intermediary
variable suffixed with `_1` is present such that the variable
declaration's initializer becomes a binary expression with its rhs being
the class expression, and its lhs being the identifier of the intermediate
variable. This structure was not recognized, resulting in such classes not
being considered as a class in `Esm2015ReflectionHost`.
As a consequence, the analysis of functions/methods that return a
`ModuleWithProviders` object did not take the methods of such classes into
account.
Another edge-case with such intermediate variable was that static
properties would not be considered as class members. A testcase was added
to prevent regressions.
Fixes#29078
PR Close#29119
Previously, several `ngtsc` and `ngcc` APIs dealing with class
declaration nodes used inconsistent types. For example, some methods of
the `DecoratorHandler` interface expected a `ts.Declaration` argument,
but actual `DecoratorHandler` implementations specified a stricter
`ts.ClassDeclaration` type.
As a result, the stricter methods would operate under the incorrect
assumption that their arguments were of type `ts.ClassDeclaration`,
while the actual arguments might be of different types (e.g. `ngcc`
would call them with `ts.FunctionDeclaration` or
`ts.VariableDeclaration` arguments, when compiling ES5 code).
Additionally, since we need those class declarations to be referenced in
other parts of the program, `ngtsc`/`ngcc` had to either repeatedly
check for `ts.isIdentifier(node.name)` or assume there was a `name`
identifier and use `node.name!`. While this assumption happens to be
true in the current implementation, working around type-checking is
error-prone (e.g. the assumption might stop being true in the future).
This commit fixes this by introducing a new type to be used for such
class declarations (`ts.Declaration & {name: ts.Identifier}`) and using
it consistently throughput the code.
PR Close#29209
Sometimes, in ESM5 code, aliases to exported variables are used internally
to refer to the exported value. This prevented some analysis from being
able to match up a reference to an export to the actual export itself.
For example in the following code:
```
var HttpClientXsrfModule = /** @class */ (function () {
function HttpClientXsrfModule() {
}
HttpClientXsrfModule_1 = HttpClientXsrfModule;
HttpClientXsrfModule.withOptions = function (options) {
if (options === void 0) { options = {}; }
return {
ngModule: HttpClientXsrfModule_1,
providers: [],
};
};
var HttpClientXsrfModule_1;
HttpClientXsrfModule = HttpClientXsrfModule_1 = tslib_1.__decorate([
NgModule({
providers: [],
})
], HttpClientXsrfModule);
return HttpClientXsrfModule;
}());
```
We were not able to tell that the `ngModule: HttpClientXsrfModule_1` property
assignment was actually meant to refer to the `function HttpClientXrsfModule()`
declaration. This caused the `ModuleWithProviders` processing to fail.
This commit ensures that we can compile typings files using the ESM5
format, so we can now update the examples boilerplate tool so that it
does not need to compile the ESM2015 format at all.
PR Close#29092
In ESM5 code, static methods appear as property assignments onto the constructor
function. For example:
```
var MyClass = (function() {
function MyClass () {}
MyClass.staticMethod = function() {};
return MyClass;
})();
```
This commit teaches ngcc how to process these forms when searching
for `ModuleWithProviders` functions that need to be updated in the typings
files.
PR Close#29092
JoostK
Alex Rickabaugh
Pete Bacon Darwin
Paul Gschwendtner
George Kalpakas