This commit updates the docs examples to be compatible with the
following Angular-specific tslint rules:
- `component-selector`
- `directive-selector`
- `no-conflicting-lifecycle`
- `no-host-metadata-property`
- `no-input-rename`
- `no-output-native`
- `no-output-rename`
This is in preparation of updating the docs examples `tslint.json` to
match the one generated for new Angular CLI apps in a future commit.
PR Close#38143
This commit updates the docs examples to be compatible with the
`prefer-const` tslint rule.
This is in preparation of updating the docs examples `tslint.json` to
match the one generated for new Angular CLI apps in a future commit.
PR Close#38143
This commit updates the docs examples to be compatible with the
`no-shadowed-variable` and `variable-name` tslint rules.
This is in preparation of updating the docs examples `tslint.json` to
match the one generated for new Angular CLI apps in a future commit.
PR Close#38143
This commit updates the docs examples to be compatible with the
`no-angle-bracket-type-assertion` tslint rule.
This is in preparation of updating the docs examples `tslint.json` to
match the one generated for new Angular CLI apps in a future commit.
PR Close#38143
This commit updates the docs examples to be compatible with the
`only-arrow-functions` tslint rule.
This is in preparation of updating the docs examples `tslint.json` to
match the one generated for new Angular CLI apps in a future commit.
PR Close#38143
Previously, only e2e tests were run for docs examples on CI. As a
result, unit tests (which are included in the zipped archives we provide
for users to download and play with the examples locally) were often
outdated and broken.
This commit configures specific docs examples that have meaningful unit
tests to run them on CI (via the `run-example-e2e.js` script). Where
necessary, the unit tests are fixed to ensure they pass and reflect the
changes in the corresponding component/service.
This commit also removes some auto-generated unit tests that are not
meaningful (e.g. make trivial assertions, such that a component instance
is truthy) and are often broken anyway (e.g. because the corresponding
component has been changed in ways that make the tests fail).
PR Close#36143
after reading the context. there are some clues to infer the payload should be the `item`, not `item.name`.
1. EventEmitter<Item>.
2. the desc say that:
The component defines a deleteRequest property that returns an EventEmitter. When the user clicks delete, the component invokes the delete() method, telling the EventEmitter to emit an **Item** object.
PR Close#30429
George Kalpakas
Vincent Guo
Brandon
Kapunahele Wong