Given:
```
<div class="s1" [class]="null" [ngClass]="exp">
```
Notice that `[class]` binding is not a `string`. As a result the existing logic would not concatenate `[class]` with `class="s1"`. The resulting falsy value would than be sent to `ngClass` which would promptly clear all styles on the `<div>`
The new logic correctly handles falsy values for `[class]` bindings.
Fix#35335
PR Close#35350
Inside `*ngFor` the second run of the styling instructions can get into situation where it tries to read a value from a binding which has not yet executed. As a result the read is `NO_CHANGE` value and subsequent property read cause an exception as it is of wrong type.
Fix#35118
PR Close#35133
This change changes the priority order of static styling.
Current priority:
```
(least priority)
- Static
- Component
- Directives
- Template
- Dynamic Binding
- Component
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
The issue with the above priority is this use case:
```
<div style="color: red;" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
In the above case the directive will win and the resulting color will be `blue`. However a small change of adding interpolation to the example like so. (Style interpolation is coming in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/34202)
```
<div style="color: red; width: {{exp}}px" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
Changes the priority from static binding to interpolated binding which means now the resulting color is `red`. It is very surprising that adding an unrelated interpolation and style can change the `color` which was not changed. To fix that we need to make sure that the static values are associated with priority of the source (directive or template) where they were declared. The new resulting priority is:
```
(least priority)
- Component
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
PR Close#34938
Previously we would write to class/style as strings `element.className` and `element.style.cssText`. Turns out that approach is good for initial render but not good for updates. Updates using this approach are problematic because we have to check to see if there was an out of bound write to style and than perform reconciliation. This also requires the browser to bring up CSS parser which is expensive.
Another problem with old approach is that we had to queue the DOM writes and flush them twice. Once on element advance instruction and once in `hostBindings`. The double flushing is expensive but it also means that a directive can observe that styles are not yet written (they are written after directive executes.)
The new approach uses `element.classList.add/remove` and `element.style.setProperty/removeProperty` API for updates only (it continues to use `element.className` and `element.style.cssText` for initial render as it is cheaper.) The other change is that the styling changes are applied immediately (no queueing). This means that it is the instruction which computes priority. In some circumstances it may result in intermediate writes which are than overwritten with new value. (This should be rare)
Overall this change deletes most of the previous code and replaces it with new simplified implement. The simplification results in code savings.
PR Close#34804
NOTE: This change must be reverted with previous deletes so that it code remains in build-able state.
This change deletes old styling code and replaces it with a simplified styling algorithm.
The mental model for the new algorithm is:
- Create a linked list of styling bindings in the order of priority. All styling bindings ere executed in compiled order and than a linked list of bindings is created in priority order.
- Flush the style bindings at the end of `advance()` instruction. This implies that there are two flush events. One at the end of template `advance` instruction in the template. Second one at the end of `hostBindings` `advance` instruction when processing host bindings (if any).
- Each binding instructions effectively updates the string to represent the string at that location. Because most of the bindings are additive, this is a cheap strategy in most cases. In rare cases the strategy requires removing tokens from the styling up to this point. (We expect that to be rare case)S Because, the bindings are presorted in the order of priority, it is safe to resume the processing of the concatenated string from the last change binding.
PR Close#34616
Fixes classes with trailing or leading space that are passed to `ngClass` (e.g. `{'foo ': bar}`) not being applied in Ivy. The issue comes from the fact that when the styling differ builds up the style map it uses the trimmed key to look up the value in the map that uses non-trimmed keys.
Fixes#34476.
PR Close#34539
Prior to this commit, values wrapped into SafeStyle were not handled correctly in [style.prop] bindings in case style sanitizer is present (when template contains some style props that require sanitization). Style sanitizer was not unwrapping values in case a given prop doesn't require sanitization.As a result, wrapped values were used as final styling values (see https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/packages/core/src/render3/styling/bindings.ts#L620). This commit updates the logic to unwrap safe values in sanitizer in case no sanitization is required.
PR Close#34286
Prior to this commit, all styles extracted from Component's template (defined using <style> tags) were ignored by JIT compiler, so only `styles` array values defined in @Component decorator were used. This change updates JIT compiler to take styles extracted from the template into account. It also ensures correct order where `styles` array values are applied first and template styles are applied second.
PR Close#34017
Prior to this change, setting style prop value to undefined or empty string would not result in resetting prop value in case the style prop is defined using [style.prop.px] syntax. The problem is that the check for empty value (and thus reseting the value) considered successful only in case of `null` value. This commit updates the check to use `isStylingValueDefined` function that also checks for undefined and empty string.
PR Close#33780
This patch ensures that the `[style]` and `[class]` based bindings
are directly applied to an element's style and className attributes.
This patch optimizes the algorithm so that it...
- Doesn't construct an update an instance of `StylingMapArray` for
`[style]` and `[class]` bindings
- Doesn't apply `[style]` and `[class]` based entries using
`classList` and `style` (direct attributes are used instead)
- Doesn't split or iterate over all string-based tokens in a
string value obtained from a `[class]` binding.
This patch speeds up the following cases:
- `<div [class]>` and `<div class="..." [class]>`
- `<div [style]>` and `<div style="..." [style]>`
The overall speec increase is by over 5x.
PR Close#33336
`LFrame` stores information specifice to the current `LView` As the code
enters and leaves `LView`s we use `enterView()` and `leaveView()`
respectively to build a a stack of `LFrame`s. This allows us to easily
restore the previous `LView` instruction state.
PR Close#33178
Prior to this fix if a map-based class or style binding wrote
its values onto an elemenent, the internal styling context would
not register the binding if the initial value as a `NO_CHANGE`
value. This situation occurs if a directive takes control of the
`class` or `style` input values and then returns a `NO_CHANGE` value
if the initial value is empty.
This patch ensures that all bindings are always registered with the
`TStylingContext` data-structure even if their initial value is
an instance of `NO_CHANGE`.
PR Close#33236
Prior to this fix, all style/class bindings (e.g. `[style]` and
`[class.foo]`) would quietly update a binding value if and when the
current binding value changes during checkNoChanges.
With this patch, all styling instructions will properly check to see
if the value has changed during the second pass of detectChanges()
if checkNoChanges is active.
PR Close#33103
Prior to this commit, all `className` inputs were not set because the runtime code assumed that the `classMap` instruction is only generated for `[class]` bindings. However the `[className]` binding also produces the same `classMap`, thus the code needs to distinguish between `class` and `className`. This commit adds extra logic to select the right input name and also throws an error in case `[class]` and `[className]` bindings are used on the same element simultaneously.
PR Close#33188
Prior to this patch, if a map-class binding is applied directly then
that value will be incorrectly provided a sanitizer even if there is no
sanitization present for an element.
PR Close#33154
This patch enables a styling debug instance (which is apart of the
`debugNode.styles` or `debugNode.classes` data structures) to expose
its context value so that it can be easily debugged.
PR Close#32856
This patch changes the Ivy `DebugElement` code to always read style and
class values directly from the native element instead of reading them
through the styling contexts. The reason for this change is because Ivy
does not make use of a debug renderer and will therefore not have access
to any classes/styles applied directly through the renderer (unless it
reads the values directly from the element).
PR Close#32842
This patch fixes a bug where the map-based cursor moves too far and
skips intermediate values when the correct combination of single-prop
bindings and map-based bindings are used together.
PR Close#32774
This patch enables a styling debug instance (which is apart of the
`debugNode.styles` or `debugNode.classes` data structures) to expose
its context value so that it can be easily debugged.
PR Close#32753
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
PR Close#32591
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
PR Close#32596
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
In the previous patch () all the existing styling code was turned
off in favor of using the new refactored ivy styling code. This
patch is a follow up patch to that and removes all old, unused
styling code from the render3 directory.
PR Close#31193
We currently have a handwritten version of the Ivy directive def for NgClass so
we can switch between Ivy and View Engine behavior. This generated code needs to
be kept up-to-date with what the Ivy compiler generates.
PR 30742 recently changed `classMap` such that it now requires allocation of
host binding slots. This means that the `allocHostVars()` function must be
called in the NgClass directive def to match compiler output, but the
handwritten directive def was not updated. This caused a bug where NgClass
was inappropriately overwriting data for other directives because space was
not allocated for its values.
PR Close#31788
This commit is the final patch of the ivy styling algorithm refactor.
This patch swaps functionality from the old styling mechanism to the
new refactored code by changing the instruction code the compiler
generates and by pointing the runtime instruction code to the new
styling algorithm.
PR Close#30742
Adds the new `classMapInterpolate1` through `classMapInterpolate8` instructions which handle interpolations inside the `class` attribute and moves the interpolation logic internally. This allows us to remove the `interpolationX` instructions in a follow-up PR.
These changes also add an error if an interpolation is encountered inside a `style` tag (e.g. `style="width: {{value}}"`). Up until now this would actually generate valid instructions, because `styleMap` goes through the same code path as `classMap` which does support interpolation. At runtime, however, `styleMap` would set invalid styles that look like `<div style="0:w;1:i;2:d;3:t;4:h;5::;7:1;">`. In `ViewEngine` interpolations inside `style` weren't supported either, however there we'd output invalid styles like `<div style="unsafe">`, even if the content was trusted.
PR Close#31211
In View Engine, we would simply ignore host style bindings on template nodes. In Ivy,
we are throwing a "Cannot read length of undefined" error instead. For backwards
compatibility, we should also ignore these bindings rather than blowing up.
PR Close#30498
We have an issue where we would like to be able to test perf counter metrics in acceptance tests, but we are unable to do so, because it will break when those same tests are run with ViewEngine. This PR adds a testing utility to `onlyInIvy` that allows for testing of performance counters, and even gives readable errors for what value on `ngDevMode` is incorrect. Has typings for decent autocompletion as well.
PR Close#30339
Fixes not being able to bind a `SafeStyle` as a camel cased style property (e.g. `[style.backgroundImage]="someSafeStyle"`). The issue was due to the fact that we only check the dash case property names to determine whether to sanitize a value.
This PR resolves FW-1279.
PR Close#30328
Fixes Ivy throwing an error because it tries to generate styling instructions for empty `style` and `class` bindings.
This PR resolves FW-1274.
PR Close#30024
The new styling algorithm in angular is designed to evaluate host
bindings stylinh priority in order of directive evaluation order. This,
however, does not work with respect to parent/sub-class directives
because sub-class host bindings are run after the parent host bindings
but still have priority. This patch ensures that the host styling bindings
for parent and sub-class components/directives are executed with respect
to the styling algorithm prioritization.
Jira Issue: FW-1132
PR Close#29602
Miško Hevery
crisbeto
Pawel Kozlowski
Andrew Kushnir
horn
Matias Niemelä
Carlos Ortiz García
Kara Erickson
Ben Lesh