Currently the `static-query` migrations fails at the final step of
updating a query when the query already specifies options which
cannot be transformed easily. e.g. the options are computed through
a function call: `@ViewChild(..., getQueryOpts());` or `@ViewChild(..., myOptionsVar)`.
In these cases we technically could add additionally logic to update
the query options, but given that this is an edge-case and it's
potentially over-engineering the migration schematic, we just
always add a TODO for the timing and print out the determined
query timing in the console. The developer in that case just needs
to manually update the logic for the query options to contain the
printed query timing.
Potentially related to: https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/14298
PR Close#30178
Disables the injectable pipe migration until we can decide whether this is the right solution for Ivy. Rolling it out properly will involve a more detailed plan and more changes like updating the styleguide, scaffolding schematics etc.
Context for the new `test-migrations.json`: since we use the `migrations.json` both for the real migrations and for tests, it doesn't allow us to disable a schematic, but continue running its tests. This change adds the test-specific file so that we can continue running the `injectable-pipe` tests, even though the schematic itself is disabled.
PR Close#30180
Currently the injectable pipe schematic generates invalid imports like `import import { Pipe, PipeTransform, Injectable } from '@angular/core'; from '@angular/core';`. The issue wasn't caught by the unit tests, because the invalid import still contains the valid one.
Fixes#30159.
PR Close#30170
Currently when someone runs `ng update` with the static-query migration,
the migration can fail with an error saying that the `AOT` compiler could not
be created. This can happen if the CLI project contains a test `tsconfig.json`
that is picked up by the schematic.
Due to the fact that spec tsconfig files cannot be ran with NGC (e.g. test
components are not part of a module; not all source files are guaranteed to
be included), test `tsconfig` projects will now use a new `test` migration
strategy where all queries within tests are left untouched and a TODO is added.
PR Close#30034
Currently the `template-var-assignment` migration incorrectly warns if
the template writes to a property in the component that has the same
`ast.PropertyWrite´ name as a template input variable but different
receiver. e.g.
```html
<!-- "someProp.element" will be incorrectly reported as template variable assignment -->
<button *ngFor="let element of list" (click)="someProp.element = null">Reset</button>
```
Similarly if an output writes to a component property with the same name as a
template input variable, but the expression is within a different template scope,
the schematic currently incorrectly warns. e.g.
```html
<button *ngFor="let element of list">{{element}}</button>
<!-- The "element = null" expression does not refer to the "element" template input variable -->
<button (click)="element = null"></button>
```
PR Close#30026
Currently the `template-strategy` for the static query migration uses the
Angular compiler in order to determine the query timing. This is problematic
as the AngularCompilerProgram also collects metadata for referenced
component stylesheets which aren't necessarily present. e.g. in a CLI
project the component can reference a Sass file. It's not guaranteed
that the standalone Angular compiler plugin supports Sass without
custom logic that is brought in by the Angular CLI webpack plugin.
In order to avoid any failures for invalid stylesheets, we just disable
normalizing of all referenced stylesheets.
PR Close#29876
Currently there are two available migration strategies for the `static-query`
schematic. Both have benefits and negatives which depend on what the
developer prefers. Since we can't decide which migration strategy is the
best for a given project, the developer should be able to select a specific
strategy through a simple choice prompt.
In order to be able to use prompts in a migration schematic, we need to
take advantage of the "inquirer" package which is also used by the CLI
schematic prompts (schematic prompts are usually only statically defined
in the schema). Additionally the schematic needs to be made "async"
because with prompts the schematic can no longer execute synchronously
without implementing some logic that blocks the execution.
PR Close#29876
Currently if there are multiple source files within a given
TypeScript source file, only the last template in the source
file is checked as we store templates in a `Map` with the
source file paths as keys.
This is problematic as multiple templates can live within the
same source file and we therefore accidentally overwrite
existing entries in the resolved templates map.
PR Close#29841
Introduces a new strategy for the `static-query` schematic that
is enabled by default. In order to provide a migration that works
for the most Angular applications and makes the upgrade as easy
as possible, the template strategy leverages the view engine
Angular compiler logic in order to determine the query timing
that is currently used within applications using view engine.
PR Close#29815
Queries can technically be also accessed within component templates
e.g.
```html
<my-comp [binding]="myQuery"></my-comp>
```
In that case the query with the property "myQuery" is accessed
statically and needs to be marked with `static: true`. There are
other edge cases that need to be handled as the template property
read doesn't necessarily resolve to the actual query property.
For example:
```html
<foo #myQuery></foo>
<my-comp [binding]="myQuery"></my-comp>
```
In this scenario the binding doesn't refer to the actual query
because the template reference variable takes precedence. The
query doesn't need to be marked with "static: true" this time.
This commit ensures that the `static-query` migration schematic
now handles this cases properly. Also template property reads
that access queries from within a `<ng-template>` are ignored
as these can't access the query before the view has been initialized.
Resolves FW-1216
PR Close#29713
Queries can not only be accessed within derived classes, but also in
the super class through abstract methods. e.g.
```
abstract class BaseClass {
abstract getEmbeddedForm(): NgForm {}
ngOnInit() {
this.getEmbeddedForm().doSomething();
}
}
class Subclass extends BaseClass {
@ViewChild(NgForm) form: NgForm;
getEmbeddedForm() { return this.form; }
}
```
Same applies for abstract properties which are implemented in the base class
through accessors. This case is also now handled by the schematic.
Resolves FW-1213
PR Close#29688
Currently the static-query schematic is not able to properly handle
call expressions that pass function declarations that access a given
query. e.g.
```ts
ngOnInit() {
this._callFunction(() => this.myQuery.doSomething());
}
_callFunction(cb: any) { cb(); }
```
In that case the passed function is executed synchronously in
the "ngOnInit" lifecycle and therefore the query needs to be
detected as "static".
We can fix this by keeping track of the current function context
and using it to resolve identifiers to the passed arguments.
PR Close#29663
Currently we only check getters for property access expressions. This is wrong
because property access expressions do not always cause the "getter" to be
triggered. e.g.
```ts
set a() {...}
get a() {...}
ngOnInit() {
this.a = true;
}
```
In that case the schematic currently incorrectly checks the "getter", while this is a binary
expression and the property access is used as left-side of the binary expression. In that
case we need to check the setter declaration of the property and not the "getter". In order
to fix this, we need to also check `ts.BinaryExpression` nodes and check getters/setters
based on the used operator token. There are three types of binary expressions:
1) Value assignment (using `=`). In that case only the setter is triggered.
2) Compound assignment (e.g. using `+=`). In that case `getter` and `setter` are triggered.
3) Comparison (e.g. using `===`). In that case only the getter is triggered.
PR Close#29663
The `template-var-assignment` schematic currently complains if someone
assigns a value to a template variable. This will no longer work with Ivy, but
it should be totally fine to update a property of the template variable if it refers
to an object. This commit adds a test that ensures that we don't incorrectly report
any failure for such property writes in bound events.
PR Close#29708
Improves the failure messages for the `template-var-assignment` schematic. After manual
testing of the schematic it's not quite clear for developers what the failure message means
without any context. The schematic now also references a short markdown file mentioning
what needs to be changed, but eventually this document needs to be expanded with more
information and context of the reasoning behind this change within Ivy.
PR Close#29708
Introduces a new update schematic called "template-var-assignment"
that is responsible for analyzing template files in order to warn
developers if template variables are assigned to values.
The schematic also comes with a driver for `tslint` so that the
check can be used wtihin Google.
PR Close#29608
Queries can also be statically accessed within getters. e.g.
```ts
ngOnInit() {
this.myQueryGetter.doSomething();
}
```
In that case we need to check if the `myQueryGetter` definition accesses
a query statically. As we need to use the type checker for every property acess
within lifecylce hooks, the schematic might become slower than before, but considering
that this is a one-time execution, it is totally fine using the type-checker extensively.
PR Close#29609
Queries can be also used statically within the "ngDoCheck" and "ngOnChanges" lifecylce hook.
In order to properly detect all queries, we need to also respect these lifecycle hooks.
Resolves FW-1192
PR Close#29492
Fixes the incorrect failure message or the TSLint rule that
is used within Google. The TSLint rule is not part of the
public schematic code.
Additionally in order to make it easier to understand what
action the developer needs to take, we rather print out the
expected "static: true/false" statement instead of saying that
a query needs to be static or dynamic. Dynamic is ambiguous, as
there is no `dynamic: true` option.
PR Close#29320
Improves the failure message for the `explicit-query` timing TSLint rule
that is used within Google. Currently it's not very clear what action
developers need to take in order to resolve the lint failure manually.
PR Close#29258
In order to be able to use the static-query migration logic within
Google, we need to provide a TSLint rule entry-point that wires up
the schematic logic and provides reporting and automatic fixes.
PR Close#29258
With 6215799, we introduced a schematic for the new static-query timing.
Currently when someone runs the update schematic manually within his
CLI project (the schematic does not run automatically yet), he might have
noticed that the migration is executed for the same `tsconfig` file multiple
times. This can happen because the `getProjectTsConfigPaths` function
can incorrectly return the same tsconfig multiple times. The paths are not
properly deduped as we don't normalize the determined project tsconfig paths
PR Close#29133
Currently the static-query migration does not properly handle functions which
are declared externally. This is because we don't resolve the symbol of the
call-expression through its type. Currently we just determine the symbol of the
call-expression through the given call expression node, which doesn't necessarily
refer to the *value declaration* of the call expression. e.g. the symbol refers to the
import declaration which imports the external function. This means that we currently
can't check the external function as we couldn't find the actual value declaration.
We can fix this by resolving the type of the call expression and using the type in order
to retrieve the symbol containing the *value declaration*
PR Close#29133
Currently when the static-query runs for a project with multiple TypeScript
configuration files (e.g. a usual CLI project), the migration incorrectly
applies the code transformation multiple times. This is because the migration
is currently based on the source file contents in the file system, while the
actual source file contents could have already changed in the devkit schematic
tree.
PR Close#29133
With 6215799055, we introduced a schematic
for the Angular core package that automatically migrates unexplicit
query definitions to the explicit query timing (static <-> dynamic).
As the initial foundation was already big enough, it was planned
to come up with a follow-up that handles asynchronous query
usages properly. e.g. queries could be used in Promises,
`setTimeout`, `setInterval`, `requestAnimationFrame` and more, but
the schematic would incorrectly declare these queries as static.
This commit ensures that we properly handle these micro/macro
tasks and don't incorrectly consider queries as static.
The declaration usage visitor should only check the synchronous
control flow and completely ignore any statements within function
like expressions which aren't explicitly executed in a synchronous
way. e.g. IIFE's still work as the function expression is
synchronously invoked.
PR Close#29133
Introduces an update schematic for the "@angular/core" package
that automatically migrates pre-V8 "ViewChild" and "ContentChild"
queries to the new explicit timing syntax. This is not required
yet, but with Ivy, queries will be "dynamic" by default. Therefore
specifying an explicit query timing ensures that developers can
smoothly migrate to Ivy (once it's the default).
Read more about the explicit timing API here:
https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/28810
PR Close#28983
Paul Gschwendtner
crisbeto
Adam Plumer
Greg Magolan