This reverts commit efcd6af17d.
Engineers on the team thought that the red color means something is
broken.
See slack discussion in #general
PR Close#29419
Currently we cache the Material `node_modules` after
the `run_angular_material_unit_tests.sh` completed. This
means that the cache will incorrectly contain the Ivy NPM
package output which might be incompatible with the
other Material dependencies. e.g. the Material postinstall
command now uses a different NGC version that does not
work with the `typescript` version that has been specified in
the Material project.
PR Close#29416
After rebasing Material on master, we found new tests that were
added and are still failing. This commit adds them to the blocklist
so we can fix them.
PR Close#29409
This PR alligns markup language lexer with the previous behaviour in version 7.x:
https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-iancj2
While this behaviour is not perfect (we should be giving users an error message
here about invalid HTML instead of assuming text node) this is probably best we
can do without more substential re-write of lexing / parsing infrastructure.
This PR just fixes#29231 and restores VE behaviour - a more elaborate fix will
be done in a separate PR as it requries non-trivial rewrites.
PR Close#29328
This guide is to help third party administrators to collect usage analytics
gathering for their own users with their own Google Analytics dashboard. It
is not meant for a generic audience.
PR Close#29382
Previously, the transitive scope calculation could lead into re-compiling
the same module multiple times. This fix ensures we cannot get into this loop.
It should be fixed more completely (e.g. more cases) once FW-1178 is resolved.
PR Close#29402
This patch is the first of a few patches which separates the
styling logic between template bindings (e.g. <div [style])
from host bindings (e.g. @HostBinding('style')). This patch
in particular introduces a series of host-specific styling
instructions and changes the existing set of template styling
instructions not to accept directives. The underyling code (which
communicates with the styling algorithm) still works as it did
before.
This PR also separates the styling instruction code into a separate
file and moves over all other instructions into an dedicated
instructions directory.
PR Close#29292
This PR alligns markup language lexer with the previous behaviour in version 7.x:
https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-iancj2
While this behaviour is not perfect (we should be giving users an error message
here about invalid HTML instead of assuming text node) this is probably best we
can do without more substential re-write of lexing / parsing infrastructure.
This PR just fixes#29231 and restores VE behaviour - a more elaborate fix will
be done in a separate PR as it requries non-trivial rewrites.
PR Close#29328
Prior to this change, we always recompile all Components/Directives/Pipes even if they were AOT-compiled and had no overrides. This is causing problems in case we try to recompile a Component with "templateUrl" or "styleUrls" (which were already resolved in case of AOT) and generally this unnecessary work that TestBed was doing is not required. This commit adds extra logic to check whether a Component/Directive/Pipe already have compiled NG def (like ngComponentDef) and whether there are no overrides present - in this case recompilation is skipped. Recompilation is also skipped in case a Component/Directive has only Provider overrides - in this situation providers resolver function is patched to reflect overrides. Provider overrides are very common in g3, thus this code path ensures no full recompilation.
PR Close#29294
This fix is for a bug in the ngtsc PartialEvaluator, which statically
evaluates expressions.
Sometimes, evaluating a reference requires resolving a function which is
declared in another module, and thus no function body is available. To
support this case, the PartialEvaluator has the concept of a foreign
function resolver.
This allows the interpretation of expressions like:
const router = RouterModule.forRoot([]);
even though the definition of the 'forRoot' function has no body. In
ngtsc today, this will be resolved to a Reference to RouterModule itself,
via the ModuleWithProviders foreign function resolver.
However, the PartialEvaluator also associates any Identifiers in the path
of this resolution with the Reference. This is done so that if the user
writes
const x = imported.y;
'x' can be generated as a local identifier instead of adding an import for
'y'.
This was at the heart of a bug. In the above case with 'router', the
PartialEvaluator added the identifier 'router' to the Reference generated
(through FFR) to RouterModule.
This is not correct. References that result from FFR expressions may not
have the same value at runtime as they do at compile time (indeed, this is
not the case for ModuleWithProviders). The Reference generated via FFR is
"synthetic" in the sense that it's constructed based on a useful
interpretation of the code, not an accurate representation of the runtime
value. Therefore, it may not be legal to refer to the Reference via the
'router' identifier.
This commit adds the ability to mark such a Reference as 'synthetic', which
allows the PartialEvaluator to not add the 'router' identifier down the
line. Tests are included for both the PartialEvaluator itself as well as the
resultant buggy behavior in ngtsc overall.
PR Close#29387
The `resolve` phase (run after all handlers have analyzed) was
introduced in 7d954dffd, but `ngcc` was not updated to run the handlers'
`resolve()` methods. As a result, certain operations (such as listing
directives used in component templates) would not be performed by
`ngcc`.
This commit fixes it by running the `resolve()` methods once analysis
has been completed.
PR Close#28963
Fixes the incorrect failure message or the TSLint rule that
is used within Google. The TSLint rule is not part of the
public schematic code.
Additionally in order to make it easier to understand what
action the developer needs to take, we rather print out the
expected "static: true/false" statement instead of saying that
a query needs to be static or dynamic. Dynamic is ambiguous, as
there is no `dynamic: true` option.
PR Close#29320
Just updating comments in query-related things to make it easier for the next person that has to grok this for the first time.
Also adds a demo from @mhevery to one of the query specs
Related #29031
PR Close#29342
Just updating comments in query-related things to make it easier for the next person that has to grok this for the first time.
Also adds a demo from @mhevery to one of the query specs
Related #29031
PR Close#29342