Currently we only run Saucelabs on PRs using the legacy View Engine
build. Switching that build to Ivy is not trivial and there are various
options:
1. Updating the R3 switches to use POST_R3 by default. At first glance,
this doesn't look easy because the current ngtsc switch logic seems to
be unidirectional (only PRE_R3 to POST_R3).
2. Updating the legacy setup to run with Ivy. This sounds like the easiest
solution at first.. but it turns out to be way more complicated. Packages
would need to be built with ngtsc using legacy tools (i.e. first building
the compiler-cli; and then building packages) and View Engine only tests
would need to be determined and filtered out. Basically it will result in
re-auditing all test targets. This is contradictory to the fact that we have
this information in Bazel already.
3. Creating a new job that runs tests on Saucelabs with Bazel. We specify
fine-grained test targets that should run. This would be a good start
(e.g. acceptance tests) and also would mean that we do not continue maintaining
the legacy setup..
This commit implements the third option as it allows us to move forward
with the general Bazel migration. We don't want to spend too much time
on our legacy setup since it will be removed anyway in the future.
PR Close#34277
This is a breaking change in nodejs rules 0.40.0 as part of the API review & cleanup for the 1.0 release. Their APIs are identical as ts_web_test was just karma_web_test without the config_file attribute.
PR Close#33802
We are close enough to blacklist a few test targets, rather than whitelist targets to run...
Because bazel rules can be composed of other rules that don't inherit tags automatically,
I had to explicitly mark all of our ts_library and ng_module targes with "ivy-local" and
"ivy-jit" tags so that we can create a query that excludes all fixme- tagged targets even
if those targets are composed of other targets that don't inherit this tag.
This is the updated overview of ivy related bazel tags:
- ivy-only: target that builds or runs only under ivy
- fixme-ivy-jit: target that doesn't yet build or run under ivy with --compile=jit
- fixme-ivy-local: target that doesn't yet build or run under ivy with --compile=local
- no-ivy-jit: target that is not intended to build or run under ivy with --compile=jit
- no-ivy-local: target that is not intended to build or run under ivy with --compile=local
PR Close#26471
All errors for existing fields have been detected and suppressed with a
`!` assertion.
Issue/24571 is tracking proper clean up of those instances.
One-line change required in ivy/compilation.ts, because it appears that
the new syntax causes tsickle emitted node to no longer track their
original sourceFiles.
PR Close#24572
This helps ensure we use the same tsconfig.json file for all compilations.
Next steps are to make it the same tsconfig.json file used by the editor
PR Close#20964
The private classes `ApplicationRef_`, `PlatformRef_`, `JSONPConnection_`, `JSONPBackend_`, `ClientMessageBrokerFactory_`, `ServiceMessageBroker_`, `ClientMessageBroker_` and `ServiceMessageBrokerFactory_` have been removed and merged into their public equivalents.
The size of the minified umd bundles have been slightly decreased:
| package | before | after |
| -------------------|------------|------------|
| core | 217.791 kb | 217.144 kb |
| http | 33.260 kb | 32.838 kb |
| platform-webworker | 56.015 kb | 54.933 kb |
PR Close#19143
This change allows ReflectiveInjector to be tree shaken resulting
in not needed Reflect polyfil and smaller bundles.
Code savings for HelloWorld using Closure:
Reflective: bundle.js: 105,864(34,190 gzip)
Static: bundle.js: 154,889(33,555 gzip)
645( 2%)
BREAKING CHANGE:
`platformXXXX()` no longer accepts providers which depend on reflection.
Specifically the method signature when from `Provider[]` to
`StaticProvider[]`.
Example:
Before:
```
[
MyClass,
{provide: ClassA, useClass: SubClassA}
]
```
After:
```
[
{provide: MyClass, deps: [Dep1,...]},
{provide: ClassA, useClass: SubClassA, deps: [Dep1,...]}
]
```
NOTE: This only applies to platform creation and providers for the JIT
compiler. It does not apply to `@Compotent` or `@NgModule` provides
declarations.
Benchpress note: Previously Benchpress also supported reflective
provides, which now require static providers.
DEPRECATION:
- `ReflectiveInjector` is now deprecated as it will be remove. Use
`Injector.create` as a replacement.
closes#18496
Currently, if a Response has an ArrayBuffer body and text() is called, Angular
attempts to convert the ArrayBuffer to a string. Doing this requires knowing
the encoding of the bytes in the buffer, which is context that we don't have.
Instead, we assume that the buffer is encoded in UTF-16, and attempt to process
it that way. Unfortunately the approach chosen (interpret buffer as Uint16Array and
create a Javascript string from each entry using String.fromCharCode) is incorrect
as it does not handle UTF-16 surrogate pairs. What Angular actually implements, then,
is UCS-2 decoding, which is equivalent to UTF-16 with characters restricted to the
base plane.
No standard way of decoding UTF-8 or UTF-16 exists in the browser today. APIs like
TextDecoder are only supported in a few browsers, and although hacks like using the
FileReader API with a Blob to force browsers to do content encoding detection and
decoding exist, they're slow and not compatible with the synchronous text() API.
Thus, this bug is fixed by introducing an encodingHint parameter to text(). The
default value of this parameter is 'legacy', indicating that the existing broken
behavior should be used - this prevents breaking existing apps. The only other
possible value of the hint is 'iso-8859' which interprets each byte of the buffer
with String.fromCharCode. UTF-8 and UTF-16 are not supported - it is up to the
consumer to get the ArrayBuffer and decode it themselves.
The parameter is a hint, as it's not always used (for example, if the conversion
to text doesn't involve an ArrayBuffer source). Additionally, this leaves the door
open for future implementations to perform more sophisticated encoding detection
and ignore the user-provided value if it can be proven to be incorrect.
Fixes#15932.
PR Close#16420
Currently `new Request({search: ...})` is not honored, and
`new Request({params: {'x': 'y'}) doesn't work either, as this object would have
toString() called. This change allows both of these cases to work, as proved by
the 2 new tests.
Fixes#15761
PR Close#16392
Paul Gschwendtner
Greg Magolan
Misko Hevery
Kara Erickson
Alan Agius
Igor Minar
George Kalpakas
Rado Kirov
Alex Eagle
Olivier Combe
Chuck Jazdzewski
Alex Rickabaugh
Tobias Bosch
Jason Aden