Previously, we had a bug where directive matching could fail if the directive
attribute was bound and followed a certain number of classes. This is because
in the matching logic, we were treating classes like normal attributes. We
should instead be skipping classes in the attribute matching logic. Otherwise
classes will match for directives with attribute selectors, and as we are
iterating through them in twos (when they are stored as name-only, not in
name-value pairs), it may throw off directive matching for any bound attributes
that come after. This commit changes the directive matching logic to skip
classes altogether.
PR Close#30002
Previous to this change, we assumed embedded views could only be created after
their parent template node had completed processing. As a result, we only set
up query logic for containers after directives on the node were created.
However, this assumption didn't take into account the case where a directive
on a template node could create views in its constructor.
This commit fixes query logic to work with views created in constructors.
In that case, we need to create a query container before the new view is
rendered so query results in the view aren't lost. But since the query container
is created before directives have completed processing, we also have to ensure
that query results gathered later on the template node are inserted before that
query container. Otherwise, query results in embedded views will clobber query
results on template nodes.
This splice mode may be slightly slower than the normal matching for queries on
containers, but we should only fall back to this strategy in the edge case where
views are created in constructors. (We should encourage developers to create
views in ngOnInit instead).
PR Close#29983
The `TNode.cleanup` data structure can contain sequences of 4-element
sequence of entries (event handlers, directive outputs) mixed with
2-element sequence of entries (QueryList cleanup). Before this fix
we would always skip 4 elements in the `TNode.cleanup` while looking
up event handler cleanups. 4-element skips are not correct in case
of query cleanup presence and this commit corrects the algorithm to
jump 4 or 2 elements depending on a type of cleanup encountered.
PR Close#29957
If a component has its definition set by defineComponent (as opposed to
JIT getter), then it will generate a factory that uses directiveInject()
to retrieve its dependencies. This can be problematic in test code because
tests could use the injection utility before bootstrapping the component,
and directiveInject() relies on the view having been created.
This commit tweaks directiveInject() to fall back to inject() if the view
has not been created. This will allow injection to work in tests even if
it is called before the component is bootstrapped.
PR Close#29948
Previous to this commit, providing a component or directive in a test
module without @Injectable() would throw because the injectable factory
would not be found. Providing components in tests in addition to declaring
or importing them is not necessary, but it should not throw an error.
This commit ensures factory data is saved when component defs and directive
defs are created, which allows them to be processed by the module injector.
Note that bootstrapping is still required for this setup to work because
directiveInject() does not support cases where the view has not been
created. This case will be handled in a future commit.
PR Close#29945
We had a bug where event.preventDefault() was not always called if listeners
were coalesced. This is because we were overwriting the previous listener's
result every time we called the next listener, so listeners early in the chain
that returned false would be ignored and preventDefault would not be called.
This commit fixes that issue, so now preventDefault() is called if any listener
in a coalesced chain returns false. This brings us in line with View Engine
behavior.
PR Close#29934
Prior to this change, element attributes annotated with i18n- prefix were removed from element attribute list and processed separately by i18n-specific logic. This behavior is causing issues with directive matching, since attributes are not present in the list of attrs for matching purposes. This commit updates i18n logic to retain attributes in the main attribute list, thus allowing directive matching logic to work correctly.
PR Close#29856
So far using runtime i18n with ivy meant that you needed to use Closure and `goog.getMsg` (or a polyfill). This PR changes the compiler to output both closure & non-closure code, while the unused option will be tree-shaken by minifiers.
This means that if you use the Angular CLI with ivy and load a translations file, you can use i18n and the application will not throw at runtime.
For now it will not translate your application, but at least you can try ivy without having to remove all of your i18n code and configuration.
PR Close#28689
Currently in Ivy we pass both the raw and parsed selectors to the projectionDef instruction, because the parsed selectors are used to match most nodes, whereas the raw ones are used to match against nodes with the ngProjectAs attribute. The raw selectors add a fair bit of code that won't be used in most cases, because ngProjectAs is somewhat rare.
These changes rework the compiler not to output the raw selectors in the projectionDef, but to parse the selector in ngProjectAs and to store it on the TAttributes. The logic for matching has also been changed so that it matches the pre-parsed ngProjectAs selector against the list of projection selectors.
PR Close#29578
Fixes the creation mode block not being run on components which have been detached from change detection.
This PR resolves FW-1217.
Fixes#29645.
PR Close#29741
The new styling algorithm in angular is designed to evaluate host
bindings stylinh priority in order of directive evaluation order. This,
however, does not work with respect to parent/sub-class directives
because sub-class host bindings are run after the parent host bindings
but still have priority. This patch ensures that the host styling bindings
for parent and sub-class components/directives are executed with respect
to the styling algorithm prioritization.
Jira Issue: FW-1132
PR Close#29602
In View Engine, we used to generate empty QueryLists for content queries on root
components (though we did not actually support populating these lists). We need
to keep this behavior in Ivy for backwards compatibility. Otherwise, components
that are sometimes used as root will fail if they are relying on content query
results to always be defined.
PR Close#29514
Angular Ivy interprets inline static style/class attribute values as instructions that
are processed whilst an element gets created. Because these inline style values are
referenced by style/class bindings, their inline style values are applied at a later
stage. Despite them being eventually applied, their values should be applied earlier
before any directives are instantiated so that directive code can rely on any inline
style/class changes.
This patch ensures that all static style/class attribute values are applied (rendered)
on the element before directives are instantiated.
Jira Issue: FW-1133
PR Close#29269
When injecting with `@Attribute`, namespaced attributes should not match (in order to have feature parity with View Engine).
This PR resolves FW-1137
PR Close#29257
BREAKING CHANGE:
Certain elements (like `<tr>` or `<col>`) require parent elements to be of a certain type by the HTML specification
(ex. <tr> can only be inside <tbody> / <thead>). Before this change Angular template parser was auto-correcting
"invalid" HTML using the following rules:
- `<tr>` would be wrapped in `<tbody>` if not inside `<tbody>`, `<tfoot>` or `<thead>`;
- `<col>` would be wrapped in `<colgroup>` if not inside `<colgroup>`.
This meachanism of automatic wrapping / auto-correcting was problematic for several reasons:
- it is non-obvious and arbitrary (ex. there are more HTML elements that has rules for parent type);
- it is incorrect for cases where `<tr>` / `<col>` are at the root of a component's content, ex.:
```html
<projecting-tr-inside-tbody>
<tr>...</tr>
</projecting-tr-inside-tbody>
```
In the above example the `<projecting-tr-inside-tbody>` component culd be "surprised" to see additional
`<tbody>` elements inserted by Angular HTML parser.
PR Close#29219
Some tests in exports spec rely on the exact output of innerHTML. In IE11 the order of attributes might change, thus causing tests to fail (in case an element contains more than one attribute). This commit avoids innerHTML usage and performs the necessary checks via element properties.
PR Close#29127
Some of the export tests had assertions that relied on capitalization
of attributes in the DOM. IE treats capitalization somewhat differently,
so our SauceLabs tests were failing.
This commit tweaks the tests so that the assertions do not rely on
attributes to be capitalized or not.
PR Close#29125
Angular supports having a component extend off of a parent component.
When this happens, all annotation-level data is inherited including styles
and classes. Up until now, Ivy only paid attention to static styling
values on the parent component and not the child component. This patch
ensures that both the parent's component and child component's styling
data is merged and rendered accordingly.
Jira Issue: FW-1081
PR Close#29015
Currently we only reset the `Attached` flag of a view if it is detached through its parent, however this means that if a root view is destroyed, its flag will never be reset. This manifested itself in one of the Material tests where we were destroying the root view.
This PR resolves FW-1130.
PR Close#29064
Currently if a user accidentally calls ViewContainerRef.insert() with
a view that has already been attached, we do not clean up the references
properly, so we create a view tree with a cycle. This causes an infinite
loop when the view is destroyed.
This PR ensures that we fall back to ViewContainerRef.move() behavior
if we try to insert a view that is already attached. This fixes the
cycle and honors the user intention.
PR Close#29047
Currently if an embedded view contains projected nodes, its `rootNodes` array will include `null` instead of the root nodes inside the projection slot. This manifested itself in one of the Material unit tests where we stamp out a template and then move its `rootNodes` into the overlay container.
This PR is related to FW-1087.
PR Close#28951
Fixes the `ngOnDestroy` hook on a component or directive being called twice, if the type is also registered as a provider.
This PR resolves FW-1010.
PR Close#28470
This commit adds support for the `static: true` flag in `ContentChild`
queries. Prior to this commit, all `ContentChild` queries were resolved
after change detection ran. This is a problem for backwards
compatibility because View Engine also supported "static" queries which
would resolve before change detection.
Now if users add a `static: true` option, the query will be resolved in
creation mode (before change detection runs). For example:
```ts
@ContentChild(TemplateRef, {static: true}) template !: TemplateRef;
```
This feature will come in handy for components that need
to create components dynamically.
PR Close#28811
This commit adds support for the `static: true` flag in
`ViewChild` queries. Prior to this commit, all `ViewChild`
queries were resolved after change detection ran. This is
a problem for backwards compatibility because View Engine
also supported "static" queries which would resolve before
change detection.
Now if users add a `static: true` option, the query will be
resolved in creation mode (before change detection runs).
For example:
```ts
@ViewChild(TemplateRef, {static: true}) template !: TemplateRef;
```
This feature will come in handy for components that need
to create components dynamically.
PR Close#28811
Prior to this commit, the timing of `ViewChild`/`ContentChild` query
resolution depended on the results of each query. If any results
for a particular query were nested inside embedded views (e.g.
*ngIfs), that query would be resolved after change detection ran.
Otherwise, the query would be resolved as soon as nodes were created.
This inconsistency in resolution timing had the potential to cause
confusion because query results would sometimes be available in
ngOnInit, but sometimes wouldn't be available until ngAfterContentInit
or ngAfterViewInit. Code depending on a query result could suddenly
stop working as soon as an *ngIf or an *ngFor was added to the template.
With this commit, users can dictate when they want a particular
`ViewChild` or `ContentChild` query to be resolved with the `static`
flag. For example, one can mark a particular query as `static: false`
to ensure change detection always runs before its results are set:
```ts
@ContentChild('foo', {static: false}) foo !: ElementRef;
```
This means that even if there isn't a query result wrapped in an
*ngIf or an *ngFor now, adding one to the template later won't change
the timing of the query resolution and potentially break your component.
Similarly, if you know that your query needs to be resolved earlier
(e.g. you need results in an ngOnInit hook), you can mark it as
`static: true`.
```ts
@ViewChild(TemplateRef, {static: true}) foo !: TemplateRef;
```
Note: this means that your component will not support *ngIf results.
If you do not supply a `static` option when creating your `ViewChild` or
`ContentChild` query, the default query resolution timing will kick in.
Note: This new option only applies to `ViewChild` and `ContentChild`
queries, not `ViewChildren` or `ContentChildren` queries, as those types
already resolve after CD runs.
PR Close#28810
Prior to this fix if a root component was instantiated it create host
bindings, but never render them once update mode ran unless one or more
slot-allocated bindings were issued. Since styling in Ivy does not make
use of LView slots, the host bindings function never ran on the root
component.
This fix ensures that the `hostBindings` function does run for a root
component and also renders the schedlued styling instructions when
executed.
Jira Issue: FW-1062
PR Close#28664
While marking a given views tree as dirty we should go all the way to the
root of the views tree and cross boundaries of dynamically inserted views.
In other words the markForCheck functionality should consider parents of
dynamically inserted views.
PR Close#28687
Prior to this change we used current injector implementation for module injector, which was causing problems and produces circular dependencies in case the same token is referenced (with @SkipSelf flag) in the `deps` array. The origin of the problem was that once `directiveInject` implementation becomes active, it was used for module injector as well, thus searching deps in Component/Directive DI scope. This fix sets `injectInjectorOnly` implementation for module injector to resolve the problem.
PR Close#28667
Previously, using a pipe in an input binding on an ng-template would
evaluate the pipe in the context of node that was processed before the
template. This caused the retrieval of e.g. ChangeDetectorRef to be
incorrect, resulting in one of the following bugs depending on the
template's structure:
1. If the template was at the root of a view, the previously processed
node would be the component's host node outside of the current view.
Accessing that node in the context of the current view results in a crash.
2. For templates not at the root, the ChangeDetectorRef injected into the
pipe would correspond with the previously processed node. If that node
hosts a component, the ChangeDetectorRef would not correspond with the
view that the ng-template is part of.
The solution to the above problem is two-fold:
1. Template compilation is adjusted such that the template instruction
is emitted before any instructions produced by input bindings, such as
pipes. This ensures that pipes are evaluated in the context of the
template's container node.
2. A ChangeDetectorRef can be requested for container nodes.
Fixes#28587
PR Close#27565
Kara Erickson
Ben Lesh
Kristiyan Kostadinov
Pawel Kozlowski
Andrew Kushnir
Olivier Combe
Matias Niemelä
Marc Laval
cexbrayat
Pete Bacon Darwin
Greg Magolan
JoostK