Currently with Ivy, `ModuleWithProvider` providers are processed in order
of declaration in the `NgModule` imports. This technically makes makes
sense but is a potential breaking change as `ModuleWithProvider` providers
are processed after all imported modules in View Engine.
In order to keep the behavior of View Engine, the `r3_injector` is updated
to no longer process `ModuleWithProvider` providers egarly.
Resolves FW-1349
PR Close#30688
There is an encoding issue with using delta `Δ`, where the browser will attempt to detect the file encoding if the character set is not explicitly declared on a `<script/>` tag, and Chrome will find the `Δ` character and decide it is window-1252 encoding, which misinterprets the `Δ` character to be some other character that is not a valid JS identifier character
So back to the frog eyes we go.
```
__
/ɵɵ\
( -- ) - I am ineffable. I am forever.
_/ \_
/ \ / \
== == ==
```
PR Close#30546
Ivy uses R3Injector, but we are currently pulling in both the StaticInjector
(View Engine injector) and the R3Injector when running with Ivy. This commit
adds an ivy switch so calling Injector.create() pulls in the correct
implementation of the injector depending on whether you are using VE or Ivy.
This saves us about 3KB in the bundle.
PR Close#30219
The `Δ` caused issue with other infrastructure, and we are temporarily
changing it to `ɵɵ`.
This commit also patches ts_api_guardian_test and AIO to understand `ɵɵ`.
PR Close#29850
Improve the stacktrace for `R3Injector` errors by adding the source component (or module) that tried to inject the missing provider, as well as the name of the injector which triggered the error (`R3Injector`).
e.g.:
```
R3InjectorError(SomeModule)[car -> SportsCar]:
NullInjectorError: No provider for SportsCar!
```
FW-807 #resolve
FW-875 #resolve
PR Close#28207
`NgModule` requires that `Component`s/`Directive`s/`Pipe`s are listed in
declarations, and that each `Component`s/`Directive`s/`Pipe` is declared
in exactly one `NgModule`. This change adds runtime checks to ensure
that these sementics are true at runtime.
There will need to be seperate set of checks for the AoT path of the
codebase to verify that same set of semantics hold. Due to current
design there does not seem to be an easy way to share the two checks
because JIT deal with references where as AoT deals with AST nodes.
PR Close#27604
(FW-777)
When an Injector is provided, R3Injector instantiates it by calling its
constructor instead of its factory, not resolving dependencies.
With this fix, the ngInjectorDef is checked and the factory is correctly
used if it is found.
PR Close#27456
ngInjectorDef.imports is generated from @NgModule.imports plus
@NgModule.exports. A problem arises as a result, because @NgModule
exports contain not only other modules (which will have ngInjectorDef
fields), but components, directives, and pipes as well. Because of
locality, it's difficult for the compiler to filter these out at
build time.
It's not impossible, but for now filtering them out at runtime will
allow testing of the compiler against complex applications.
PR Close#24862
Ivy definition looks something like this:
```
class MyService {
static ngInjectableDef = defineInjectable({
…
});
}
```
Here the argument to `defineInjectable` is well known public contract which needs
to be honored in backward compatible way between versions. The type of the
return value of `defineInjectable` on the other hand is private and can change
shape drastically between versions without effecting backwards compatibility of
libraries publish to NPM. To our users it is effectively an `OpaqueToken`.
By prefixing the type with `ɵ` we are communicating the the outside world that
the value is not public API and is subject to change without backward compatibility.
PR Close#23371
This adds compilation of @NgModule providers and imports into
ngInjectorDef statements in generated code. All @NgModule annotations
will be compiled and the @NgModule decorators removed from the
resultant js output.
All @Injectables will also be compiled in Ivy mode, and the decorator
removed.
PR Close#22458
`main()` function used to be needed to support dart, since dart
Does not allow top level statements. Since we no longer use dart
The need for `main()` has been removed.
In preparation for `Basel` and standardized way of running tests
we are removing `main()`
PR Close#21053