Follow-up for de8ebbdfd0. We need to
disable a few HammerJS gesture tests of the component repository by
adding them to the material-ci test blocklist.
This is now surfaces because we updated the commit of the
`material-unit-tests` job to a more recent state where we re-enabled
the HammerJS gesture tests on the components-side. The tests were
previously disabled on the components repository because the blocklist
didn't work on Angular. See:
eaf70ca2a0.
PR Close#32485
Currently, it's not possible to tree-shake away the
coordination layer between HammerJS and Angular's
EventManager. This means that you get the HammerJS
support code in your production bundle whether or
not you actually use the library.
This commit removes the Hammer providers from the
default platform_browser providers list and instead
provides them as part of a `HammerModule`. Apps on
Ivy just need to import the `HammerModule` at root
to turn on Hammer support. Otherwise all Hammer code
will tree-shake away. View Engine apps will require
no change.
BREAKING CHANGE
Previously, in Ivy applications, Hammer providers
were included by default. With this commit, apps
that want Hammer support must import `HammerModule`
in their root module.
PR Close#32203
Initially the blocklist has been removed because there were
no remaining disabled tests that failed. Also the blocklist
logic didn't work anymore because the `material-unit-tests` CI
job now runs against `angular/components#master` with Bazel.
388578fec9 tried to revert the removal
of the blocklist in favor of a new upcoming breaking change with
HammerJS, but the revert doesn't help since the blocklist still
doesn't work with Bazel.
In order to make the blocklist work with the unit tests running
with Bazel, a PR has been submitted on the components repository.
See: https://github.com/angular/components/pull/16833.
This commit updates the blocklist logic on the framework side to
work with the new logic on the components repo side.
PR Close#32239
Initially when the `material-unit-tests` job got wired up,
Ivy was not really backwards-compatible and a few bugs caused
test failures when running the Angular Material test suites w/ Ivy.
These bugs got fixed progressively and eventually the test
blocklist became empty. At this point we don't want to regress
in the future and the blocklist should never have new items.
Additionally since we switched the unit-tests job to run against
Angular Material `master` with Bazel, the blocklist is no
longer respected. Therefore we can safely remove the blocklist.
PR Close#32138
The new styling algorithm in angular is designed to evaluate host
bindings stylinh priority in order of directive evaluation order. This,
however, does not work with respect to parent/sub-class directives
because sub-class host bindings are run after the parent host bindings
but still have priority. This patch ensures that the host styling bindings
for parent and sub-class components/directives are executed with respect
to the styling algorithm prioritization.
Jira Issue: FW-1132
PR Close#29602
After rebasing Material on master, we found new tests that were
added and are still failing. This commit adds them to the blocklist
so we can fix them.
PR Close#29409
Angular Ivy interprets inline static style/class attribute values as instructions that
are processed whilst an element gets created. Because these inline style values are
referenced by style/class bindings, their inline style values are applied at a later
stage. Despite them being eventually applied, their values should be applied earlier
before any directives are instantiated so that directive code can rely on any inline
style/class changes.
This patch ensures that all static style/class attribute values are applied (rendered)
on the element before directives are instantiated.
Jira Issue: FW-1133
PR Close#29269
Angular supports having a component extend off of a parent component.
When this happens, all annotation-level data is inherited including styles
and classes. Up until now, Ivy only paid attention to static styling
values on the parent component and not the child component. This patch
ensures that both the parent's component and child component's styling
data is merged and rendered accordingly.
Jira Issue: FW-1081
PR Close#29015
Currently we only reset the `Attached` flag of a view if it is detached through its parent, however this means that if a root view is destroyed, its flag will never be reset. This manifested itself in one of the Material tests where we were destroying the root view.
This PR resolves FW-1130.
PR Close#29064
Currently if a user accidentally calls ViewContainerRef.insert() with
a view that has already been attached, we do not clean up the references
properly, so we create a view tree with a cycle. This causes an infinite
loop when the view is destroyed.
This PR ensures that we fall back to ViewContainerRef.move() behavior
if we try to insert a view that is already attached. This fixes the
cycle and honors the user intention.
PR Close#29047
Currently if an embedded view contains projected nodes, its `rootNodes` array will include `null` instead of the root nodes inside the projection slot. This manifested itself in one of the Material unit tests where we stamp out a template and then move its `rootNodes` into the overlay container.
This PR is related to FW-1087.
PR Close#28951
Paul Gschwendtner
Kara Erickson
Matias Niemelä
Marc Laval
Kristiyan Kostadinov
Pawel Kozlowski
Andrew Seguin