Historically all .bazel files were owned by dev-infra to assist in ensuring that
consistency was maintained in how rules were being used. As this now has reached
a point of maturity in the repository where the check is mostly a rubber stamping,
this requirement can be removed. Notably this is different than the requirement
of dev-infra approval for .bzl files as these contain the implementation of macros
rather than just the usage.
PR Close#41382
After being OOO for a while, I have been denoted as OOO in the pullapprove
configuration (by commenting out the username in the reviewer lists).
See 3ba97ab391.
This re-activates `devversion` in the pullapprove configuration.
PR Close#41352
Our approach for handling cyclic imports results in code that is
not easy to tree-shake, so it is not suitable for publishing in a
library.
When compiling in partial compilation mode, we are targeting
such library publication, so we now create a fatal diagnostic
error instead of trying to handle the cyclic import situation.
Closes#40678
PR Close#40782
Much like the compiler-cli, the language-service package has internal testing
tools that are not intended for external use and do not need fw-testing review.
See #40679.
PR Close#40795
Much like the compiler-cli, the language-service package has internal testing
tools that are not intended for external use and do not need fw-testing review.
See #40679.
PR Close#40787
This commit adds a new `docs-contributors` group (with Emma and Minko as members) which will be used as reviewers
for PRs that update the list of contributors.
PR Close#40368
This reverts commit c88e8141abb411bd955e29f2670b9e2c204cce1a.
This reverts the revert that undid the doing of the pull approve
approval.
PR Close#40059
This reverts commit 9f8ccd577f481a3ca4508287ec06cdf863561f69. The
PullApprove labeling is unfortunately removing labels rather than
adding them.
PR Close#40053
The fw-testing group should only match on testing directories within the
framework packages, previously it was also matching in other areas of
the codebase.
PR Close#39536
Alowing for disabling PullApprove on a single PR via adding a label allows
for an escape hatch if PullApprove is not acting as expected, or for cases
where reviews can be stepped over in obvious situations, such as a revert.
PR Close#39430
This commit edits the copy of the attribute binding documentation, moves the
colspan section that is primarily about property binding to the property
binding document, and adds a docregion to the attribute-binding
example to help clarify a point in the document.
Part of the copy edit reformats the style precedence list in tabular format
so that it is easier to read and understand.
PR Close#38860
Using fixup commits when addressing review feedback can considerably
improve the review experience on subsequent reviews.
This commit adds information and guidelines for contributors on how to
work with fixup commits.
Fixes#33042
PR Close#39110
Remove @angular/platform-webworker and @angular/platform-webworker-dynamic
as they were deprecated in v8
BREAKING CHANGE: @angular/platform-webworker and @angular/platform-webworker-dynamic
have been removed as they were deprecated in v8
PR Close#38846
Notes Paul and Pawel as OOO through commenting out their usernames in users
entries throughout the pullapprove configs which could result in their review
being requested by pullapprove.
PR Close#39028
The changes in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/38368 split `render3/i18n.ts` files into
smaller scripts, but the PullApprove config was not updated to reflect that. This commit updates
the PullApprove config to reflect the recent changes in i18n-related files.
PR Close#38403
Since PullApprove starts all inactive groups as a pending state, to properly
assess if any groups we care about are pending we must only check the active
groups. We additionally do this with rejected because the intention of the
reusable checks is around checking active rules only.
PR Close#38259
It was determined that the list of 'pending' groups also included inactive groups.
That means that the 'no-groups-above-this-pending' would generally fail because
there's almost always some inactive group above it.
This commit removes the conditions for phased review while we
investigate if the inactive groups can be excluded.
PR Close#38257
* Add alxhub, atscott, and AndrewKushnir to code owners
* Add atscott & AndrewKushnir to public-api and size-tracking
Follow-up to #37994
PR Close#38170
The size-tracking, public-api, and circular-dependencies groups can get a lot of
PRs to review. In addition, the members of these groups do not always
have the necessary context to fully review the PR in question. This
change ensures that the owners in the groups where the changes are being
made have approve the changes (ie, the aren't pending or rejected)
before requesting final sign-off from these three critical groups.
PR Close#37798
global-approvers, global-docs-approvers, and required-minimum-review groups are always active. It's useful
to have aliases for getting groups that are active/pending/rejected while excluding these few.
PR Close#37798