Previously there was a regression in PullApprove which preventing draft mode
from being respected correctly for PullApprove processing. This regression
has been remedied and we should be able to once again respect draft mode for
PRs.
PR Close#35396
Previously we needed the `components-repo-ci` blocklist to disable
tests that were failing during the development of Ivy. Since we fixed
all those failing tests, and we don't want to regress, we can remove the
blocklist logic.
Resolves FW-1807
PR Close#35115
This condition is being removed as it currently is failing to work as
expected with pullapprove at the moment. The plan/expectation is that
after a bit of troubleshooting, we will be able to add in the condition
once more. Removing the condition actually returns us to the same
state we were in with CODEOWNERS in which draft PRs are also assigned
reviews.
PR Close#35012
We are migrating to PullApprove for our PR review management in an attempt
to allow for more granular and equitable code review assignments across the
team. Currently this migration is equivalent in the review assignments
it will create. Once stable, our expectation is that we will be able to
take advantage of PullApproves additional features for things like staged
reviews.
PR Close#34814
Summary of changes:
- created .github/CODEOWNERS with docs and config similar to the one in .pullapprove.yml
- updated docs
- updated .github/angular-robot.yml to not expect pullapprove status
- removed .pullapprove.yml
The primary motivations behind this change are:
- CODEOWNERS didn't exist when we introduced pullapprove
- CODEOWNERS is a functionality tightly integrated with github which results in better DX
- pullapprove v2 has been very unstable recently causing productivity loss
- pullapprove v2 has been deprecated in favor of v3, which requires and migration
PR Close#27690
these files are test data and note test infrastructure, so they don't belong to this group.
this means that the core group can now approve the golden symbol changes
PR Close#27004
With this update to permissions the docs team can easily identify the technical reviewer for a particular doc, which should streamline the reviews.
I also added Jennifer into all groups that contain docs, so that she can approve changes that contain only editorial changes.
Closes#21692
PR Close#25257
This PR was merged without API docs and general rollout plan.
We can't release this as is in 5.1 without a plan for documentation, cli integration, etc.
With this commit `ngc` is used instead of `tsc-wrapped` for
collecting metadata and tsickle rewriting and `tsc-wrapped`
is removed from the repository.
`@angular/tsc-wrapped@5` is now deprecated and is no longer
used, updated, or maintained as part as of Angular 5.x.x.
`@angular/tsc-wrapped@4` is still maintained and required by
Angular 4.x.x and will be maintained as long as 4.x.x is in
LTS.
PR Close#19298
the aio/ has a separate build and ci setup that doesn't affect main repo, so it doesn't make
sense for the build-and-ci group to approve changes to that separate setup.
All the docs related files (docs-app, doc-gen, content, etc)
are now to be found inside the `/aio` folder.
The related gulp tasks have been moved from the top level
gulp file to a new one inside the `/aio` folder.
The structure of the `/aio` folder now looks like:
```
/aio/
build/ # gulp tasks
content/ #MARKDOWN FILES for devguides, cheatsheet, etc
devguides/
cheatsheets/
transforms/ #dgeni packages, templates, etc
src/
app/
assets/
content/ #HTML + JSON build artifacts produced by dgeni from /aio/content.
#This dir is .gitignored-ed
e2e/ #protractor tests for the doc viewer app
node_modules/ #dependencies for both the doc viewer builds and the dgeni stuff
#This dir is .gitignored-ed
gulpfile.js #Tasks for generating docs and building & deploying the doc viewer
```
Closes#14361
- restrict root to be just root
- add fallback users to all groups
- fix indentation
- change order of users so that primary reviewers are first, follow by alpha-sorted secondaries, followed by fallback reviewers